Headline

7 Things To Know About Daylight Saving Time As It Ends Sunday

Published

11 months ago

November 3, 2024

Editor

At 2 a.m. on Sunday, Nov. 3, it’s time to set clocks back one hour as daylight saving time (DST) comes to an end.

This yearly time change has an interesting history, and we’ve gathered some fascinating details about its origins and unique practices worldwide.

1. A Bug Hunter’s Idea Sparked Daylight Saving Time

In 1895, George Hudson, a New Zealand entomologist, conceptualized the modern idea of DST. His motivation was simple yet unusual: Hudson wanted more sunlight after work during summer so he could go bug hunting. He proposed a two-hour time shift to the Wellington Philosophical Society, though the idea gained little traction at first. In 1905, British builder William Willett suggested a similar concept, advocating for seasonal time changes to maximize daylight. Willett’s idea reached British Parliament in 1909, and by 1916, the United Kingdom officially adopted DST.

2. Germany Led the Way in Observing Daylight Saving Time

Germany became the first country to officially implement DST on April 30, 1916, as a wartime measure to conserve electricity. This change was quickly followed by the United Kingdom, which introduced “summer time” soon after.

3. It’s Daylight ‘Saving’ – Not ‘Savings’

While it’s often called “daylight savings time,” the correct term is “daylight saving time” – without the extra “s.”

4. The United States Standardized DST in 1966

In the United States, Congress first passed a national law for DST during World War I in 1918, allowing states to decide whether they’d continue the practice after the war ended. The idea resurfaced during World War II, again as a fuel-saving measure. But it wasn’t until the Uniform Time Act of 1966 that DST became widely recognized across the country. Congress later set DST to start in March and end in November beginning in 2007.

5. Some States Don’t Observe Daylight Saving Time

While DST is a widespread practice in the U.S., it’s not universal. Hawaii and parts of Arizona, among a few other areas, do not observe DST due to their unique daylight needs and climate.

6. DST Affects More Than Just Clocks

Daylight Saving Time impacts more than just our clocks—it affects various sectors and activities. Public transportation, broadcasting, medical schedules, and even agriculture are all influenced by the time shift. Airlines and train schedules can become complicated, with some regions observing DST and others not. Farmers also face challenges since their routines are closely tied to sunrise and sunset, which do not change with the clock.

7. DST Can Impact Health and Productivity

The time change disrupts the body’s natural circadian rhythm, which regulates sleep and wake cycles. Studies have shown that adjusting clocks can lead to sleep deprivation, resulting in reduced productivity, impaired cognitive function, and even increased risk of heart attacks and strokes. On the Monday following the “spring forward” time change, there is often a noticeable spike in workplace accidents and injuries, as people struggle to adapt to the lost hour.

Source: Vanguard

Headline

Antitrust Trial: US Asks Court To Break Up Google’s Ad Business

Published

11 hours ago

September 22, 2025

Editor

Google faces a fresh federal court test on Monday as US government lawyers ask a judge to order the breakup of the search engine giant’s ad technology business.

The lawsuit is Google’s second such test this year, following a similar government demand to split up its empire that was shot down by a judge earlier this month.

Monday’s case focuses specifically on Google’s ad tech “stack” — the tools that website publishers use to sell ads and that advertisers use to buy them.

In a landmark decision earlier this year, Federal Judge Leonie Brinkema agreed with the US Department of Justice (DOJ) that Google maintained an illegal grip on this market.

Monday’s trial is set to determine what penalties and changes Google must implement to undo its monopoly.

According to filings, the US government will argue that Google should spin off its ad publisher and exchange operations. The DOJ will also ask that after the divestitures are complete, Google be banned from operating an ad exchange for 10 years.

Google will argue that the divestiture demands go far beyond the court’s findings, are technically unfeasible, and would be harmful to the market and smaller businesses.

“We’ve said from the start that DOJ’s case misunderstands how digital advertising works and ignores how the landscape has dramatically evolved, with increasing competition and new entrants,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs.

In a similar case in Europe, the European Commission, the EU’s antitrust enforcer, earlier this month fined Google 2.95 billion euros ($3.47 billion) over its control of the ad tech market.

Brussels ordered behavioral changes, drawing criticism that it was going easy on Google as it had previously indicated that a divestiture may be necessary.

This remedy phase of the US trial follows a first trial that found Google operated an illegal monopoly. It is expected to last about a week, with the court set to meet again for closing arguments a few weeks later.

The trial begins in the same month that a separate judge rejected a government demand that Google divest its Chrome browser, in an opinion that was largely seen as a victory for the tech giant.

That was part of a different case, also brought by the US Department of Justice, in which the tech giant was found responsible for operating an illegal monopoly, this time in the online search space.

Instead of a major breakup of its business, Google was required to share data with rivals as part of its remedies.

The US government had pushed for Chrome’s divestment, arguing the browser serves as a crucial gateway to the internet that brings in a third of all Google web searches.

Shares in Google-parent Alphabet have skyrocketed by more than 20 percent since that decision.

Judge Brinkema has said in pre-trial hearings that she will closely examine the outcome of the search trial when assessing her path forward in her own case.

These cases are part of a broader bipartisan government campaign against the world’s largest technology companies. The US currently has five pending antitrust cases against such companies.

AFP

Headline

Google Faces Court Battle Over Breakup Of Ad Tech Business

Published

12 hours ago

September 22, 2025

Editor

Google faces a fresh federal court test on Monday as US government lawyers ask a judge to order the breakup of the search engine giant’s ad technology business.

The lawsuit is Google’s second such test this year after the California-based tech juggernaut saw a similar government demand to split up its empire shot down by a judge earlier this month.

Monday’s case focuses specifically on Google’s ad tech “stack” — the tools that website publishers use to sell ads and that advertisers use to buy them.

In a landmark decision earlier this year, Federal Judge Leonie Brinkema agreed with the US Department of Justice (DOJ) that Google maintained an illegal grip on this market.
Monday’s trial is set to determine what penalties and changes Google must implement to undo its monopoly.

Google will argue that the divestiture demands go far beyond the court’s findings, are technically unfeasible, and would be harmful to the market and smaller businesses.

In a similar case in Europe, the European Commission, the EU’s antitrust enforcer, earlier this month fined Google 2.95 billion euros ($3.47 billion) over its control of the ad tech market.
Brussels ordered behavioral changes, drawing criticism that it was going easy on Google as it had previously indicated that a divestiture may be necessary.

The trial begins in the same month that a separate judge rejected a government demand that Google divest its Chrome browser, in an opinion that was largely seen as a victory for the tech giant.

That was part of a different case, also brought by the US Department of Justice, in which the tech giant was found responsible for operating an illegal monopoly, this time in the online search space.
Instead of a major breakup of its business, Google was required to share data with rivals as part of its remedies.

The US government had pushed for Chrome’s divestment, arguing the browser serves as a crucial gateway to the internet that brings in a third of all Google web searches.
Shares in Google-parent Alphabet have skyrocketed by more than 20 percent since that decision.

Judge Brinkema has said in pre-trial hearings that she will closely examine the outcome of the search trial when assessing her path forward in her own case.

These cases are part of a broader bipartisan government campaign against the world’s largest technology companies. The US currently has five pending antitrust cases against such companies.

Headline

Peru Anti-government Protesters Clash With Police

Published

1 day ago

September 21, 2025

Editor

Hundreds of anti-government protesters clashed with police in the Peruvian capital Lima on Saturday, throwing stones and sticks as officers fired tear gas on the demonstrators, AFP journalists reported.

The protest, organized by a youth collective called “Generation Z”, is part of growing social unrest in Peru against organized crime, corruption in public office, and a recent pension reform.

“Today, there is less democracy than before. It’s getting worse… because of fear, because of extortion,” said 54-year-old protester Gladys, who declined to give her last name.

Around 500 people gathered in the city center, under heavy police presence.

“Congress has no credibility, it doesn’t even have the approval of the people… It is wreaking havoc in this country,” said protester Celene Amasifuen.

The clashes broke out as demonstrators tried to approach executive and congressional buildings in Lima.

The radio station Exitosa said that its reporter and a cameraman were hit by pellets, commonly fired by law enforcement.

Police said at least three officers were wounded.

Approval ratings for President Dina Boluarte, whose term ends next year, have plummeted amid rising extortion and organized crime cases.

Several opinion polls show the government and conservative-majority Congress are seen by many as corrupt institutions.

This week, the legislature passed a law requiring young adults to join a private pension fund, despite many facing a precarious working environment.