Connect with us

Metro

Alleged Defamation: Why We Can’t Debar Farotimi, LPDC Tells Afe Babalola

Published

on

….dismisses petition for lack of jurisdiction

The Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee, LPDC, has adduced reasons why it cannot revoke the license that allows the embattled, controversial author and activist, Dele Farotimi, to practice law in Nigeria.

Advertisement

The legal body held that it lacked the requisite jurisdiction to delve into issues relating to the allegation of criminal defamation and professional misconduct, which were brought against Farotimi by the law firm of Chief Afe Babalola, SAN, Emmanuel Chambers.

The law firm had, in its petition, urged the LPDC to debar Farotimi by removing his name from the roll of legal practitioners in the country.

In the 90-page petition dated December 6 and signed by a partner in the firm, Mr. Ola Faro, it was alleged that Farotimi violated certain provisions of the rules of professional conduct for lawyers in his contentious book titled “Nigeria And Its Criminal Justice System.”

Advertisement

READ ALSO: JUST IN: Court Grants Farotimi N30m Bail, Bars Media Interviews

Specifically, Farotimi was accused of acting in breach of Rules 1, 15(1), 15(2b), 15(3a), 15(3g), 15(3i), 15(3j), 26(1), 27(1), 30, 31(1), (2) and (4) of the Rules of Professional Conduct 2023 “by bringing the entire judiciary in Nigeria into disrepute with his unfounded allegations of corruption against eminent justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, judges of the High Court of Lagos State, Aare Afe Babalola, SAN, Olu Deramola, SAN, and Ola Faro, Esq., and the entire chambers of Afe Babalola & Co. in his book.”

Insisting that Farotimi engaged in conduct that was unbecoming of a legal practitioner by making false accusations against the Supreme Court and the legal profession, the petitioners further alleged that he participated in unlawful conduct by bribing judicial officers and gaining unlawful access to a judicial officer.

Advertisement

“He joined his clients in committing misconduct and breach of law with reference to judicial officers by having unlawful access to a judicial officer. He gave service to his client, which he knows is capable of causing a breach of law and disrespect and corrupting a judicial officer. He knowingly made a false statement of law and facts with respect to a case already decided by the Supreme Court.

READ ALSO: JUST IN: Police Arrest Human Rights Lawyer Farotimi Over Defamation Allegation

“He assisted his clients in a conduct that he knows to be illegal and fraudulent. Knowingly engaged in illegal conduct in the course of his practice as a legal practitioner. Treated his fellow lawyers without respect, fairness, consideration, and dignity, allowing ill feelings between opposing clients to influence his conduct and demeanour by distorting the facts of a case in the cause of his practice as a legal practitioner.

Advertisement

“Failed to observe good faith and fairness in dealing with other lawyers in respect to a case already decided by the Supreme Court. Conducted himself in a manner that obstructed, delayed, and adversely affected the administration of justice by taking steps to frustrate a decision of the Supreme Court for his personal benefit and the benefit of his client, who lost at the Supreme Court.

“Treated the court, particularly the Supreme Court, without respect, dignity, and honour by using uncouth, unprofessional, undignified, and offensive language against the Supreme Court and the justices of the Supreme Court. Made defamatory statements against judicial officers rather than making a complaint to appropriate authorities.”

It was the contention of the petitioners that the author “indicated that he discussed a pending case with a judge trying the case in the absence of an opposing lawyer. The contravention of these rules by the Respondent (Farotimi) prompted this petition to protect the dignity of the legal profession and the dignity of the court as the temple of justice and to uphold the standards of the legal profession.”

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Trump Secures $15m in ABC News Defamation Settlement

They further noted that some statements in the book had the potential to inflame the legal profession and society, maintaining that the corruption allegations were made to discredit the Nigerian judiciary and to subject the law firm to ridicule so as to damage its hard-earned reputation and financial standing.

However, the LPDC, in its report marked B8B/LPDC/1571/2024, said it was satisfied that all the offences that were listed by the petitioners occurred in Farotimi’s capacity as an author and not during his practice as a legal professional.

Advertisement

The LPDC said it was bereft of the jurisdiction to address complaints about publications, even as it enjoined the aggrieved parties to seek redress in regular courts.

“The publication is an intellectual property and not a conduct or action committed while practising as a legal practitioner.

“All aggrieved parties who find the publication ‘defamatory’ should ventilate their grievances through the regular courts,” the LPDC, which is led by Justice Ishaq Bello, added.

Advertisement

It will be recalled that Farotimi had since been arraigned before the Federal High Court in Ekiti State and an Ekiti State Magistrates’ Court, Ado-Ekiti, for alleged criminal defamation.

Likewise, both a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Abuja and an Oyo State High Court barred him from further publishing, selling, circulating, advertising, or distributing the hard or soft copies of the controversial book.
VANGUARD

Advertisement

Metro

Fedpoly Bauchi Shut Down Over Violent Students Protest

Published

on

By

Fedpoly Bauchi shut down over violent students protest
The Management of the Federal Polytechnic, Bauchi, has ordered the immediate and indefinite closure of the institution following a violent student protest in the early hours of Tuesday morning.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that angry students of the institution embarked on a violent protest at about 10 am after an alleged midnight robbery at the male hostel.

Advertisement

The management announced the closure in a statement issued by the Registrar, Alhaji Kasimu Salihu, and made available to newsmen in Bauchi on Tuesday.

It stated: “The Management of the Federal Polytechnic, Bauchi has received the disturbing news of some unscrupulous elements who invaded the male students’ hostel, taking away their belongings and injuring two students.

“Consequent upon this sad development, students came out of the Polytechnic Main Gate to express their justifiable frustration, calling on management to act.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Thousands Protest In Tel Aviv Against Israeli Govt Move To Expand Gaza War

“While management acted immediately with all principal officers and management staff showing up to address the students and situation, it was established that hoodlums, who do not mean well for the students and institution, had taken over what was meant to be a peaceful protest.

“Against the background of this ugly situation, the management hereby orders the immediate closure of academic activities.”

Advertisement

The statement added that the students were given two hours to vacate the campus, effective immediately, until further notice.

Some of the students, who spoke on the condition of anonymity with reporters during the protest, said that the robbery occurred in the middle of the night.

They also said that the institution’s management had failed to provide adequate security.

Advertisement

One of the students, Ismail Abubakar, expressed frustration over the development.

READ ALSO:Youths Protest Abandoned Road In Delta

Abubakar said that it was disturbing that “students are not safe off campus and on campus.

Advertisement

“They collected more than 50 phones during the robbery and wounded a couple of students with dangerous weapons”.

The Student Union Government President, Haruna Umar, who also condemned the attack, stated that it had never occurred in the history of the Polytechnic.

Meanwhile, the Bauchi Police Command says it has apprehended and detained three suspected members of the gang responsible for the robbery.

Advertisement

The command’s Spokesman, CSP Ahmed Wakili, confirmed the development in a statement issued via its online platform.

According to Wakili, the command “received intelligence through the Chief Security Officer (CSO) serving with the institution.

READ ALSO:Dangote Refinery Reduces Fuel Price

Advertisement

The intelligence disclosed a security breach by unidentified hoodlums, who trespassed into the institution through the fenced wall and forcefully took the students’ phones.

“During the skirmishes, some of the students confronted the hoodlums, which resulted in various degrees of injuries to the students.

“On receipt of the report, teams of detectives attached to E’ Division, immediately despatched to the scene, conveyed the victims to the institution’s clinic for first aid,” the statement added.

Advertisement

It further disclosed that the command later dispatched a reinforcement team to the scene of the students’ protest to end the molestation of innocent people, breaking into and looting of shops and valuables.

READ ALSO:Tinubu Appoints Prof. Akinfeleye, Others To Varsities’ Governing Councils

Wakili explained that the operatives applied minimal force to disperse the illegal crowd after they encountered initial resistance.

Advertisement

He stated that the situation had been successfully brought under control, adding that 36 male and 12 female persons were being detained for alleged involvement in the protest.

He also stated that the three robbery suspects admitted during interrogation “that they criminally conspired, invaded the students’ hostels, threatened and forcefully dispossessed the students of their valuables, including phones and laptops.

“They also confessed to having inflicted various degrees of injuries on some of the students, who attempted to challenge them.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Metro

Stop Begging Tinubu For Nnamdi Kanu’s Release, IPOB Tells Igbo Leaders

Published

on

By

The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, yesterday frowned at what it calls the act of prominent Igbo men begging President Bola Tinubu for the release of its leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, instead of demanding his immediate and unconditional release.

The pro-Biafra group said Mazi Kanu is not a criminal, nor did he commit any crime that warrants people to be begging for his release, describing such begging by prominent Igbo men as disgraceful and unacceptable to IPOB.

Advertisement

IPOB, in a statement by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Emma Powerful, titled “Stop begging Tinubu, Demand for the Immediate and Unconditional Release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Now,” cited a recent instance of a prominent Igbo man begging Tinubu to release Mazi Kanu.

IPOB’s statement read, “The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, under the leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, categorically rejects and condemns the shameful spectacle of Igbo figures, groveling before President Bola Tinubu with pleas and beggarly appeals for our leader’s ‘pardon’ or ‘release.”

READ ALSO:Nnamdi Kanu Slams N50bn Defamation Suit Against Reno Omokri

Advertisement

Such cowardly submissions, as seen in one Idimogu’s recent public groveling, where he begged Tinubu to free Kanu as a political favor to boost APC’s 2027 fortunes and revive the South-East economy, reek of self-serving opportunism and betrayal.

“They insult the intelligence of the Biafran people, undermine the rule of law, and perpetuate the false narrative that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has committed any crime warranting mercy from a regime built on impunity.

“Let us be unequivocally clear: Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is not a criminal in need of pardon. He is a prisoner of conscience, unlawfully abducted from Kenya on June 27, 2021, in blatant violation of Kenyan sovereignty, Nigeria’s Extradition Act 2004, and international treaties, including the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

Advertisement

“Both Kenyan and Nigerian courts have affirmed this criminal abduction: the Kenyan High Court ruled it illegal, and Nigeria’s Court of Appeal, in its subsisting judgment of October 13, 2022, discharged Mazi Nnamdi Kanu outright, declaring no Nigerian court has jurisdiction to try him due to the jurisdictional nullity caused by his rendition.

READ ALSO:FG Closes Case In Alleged Terrorism Trial Against Nnamdi Kanu

“This appellate discharge, grounded in fundamental defects, stands as a final acquittal under Nigerian jurisprudence irrevocable unless explicitly stated “without prejudice,” which it was not (Suleman v. FRN, 2018; Mohammed v. State, 2017).

Advertisement

“The Supreme Court’s December 15, 2023, ruling, remitting the case for trial, is a per incuriam travesty, a nullity that cannot override the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

“Section 36(9) enshrines ironclad protection against double jeopardy: no person discharged by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be tried again for the same offense. The highest law in Nigeria is the Constitution, not the Supreme Court, and any judgment flouting constitutional safeguards is dead on arrival.

“Furthermore, the charges rely on repealed laws (Terrorism Prevention Act 2011/2013), extinguished under Section 6(3) of the Interpretation Act 2004, with no savings clause to revive them (A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State, 2002; Okeke v. State, 2019).

Advertisement

“The de novo trial before Justice Omotosho, commencing March 29, 2025, where Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was forced to plead not guilty anew, is an absolute nullity—void ab initio for lacking jurisdiction.

READ ALSO:Guest Collapses, Dies At Niger Govt House In Minna

Begging Tinubu, therefore, reinforces dictatorship and autocracy, portraying Nigeria as a lawless fiefdom where executive whims trump judicial finality. It signals weakness to our oppressors, implying Kanu is guilty when the law has exonerated him.

Advertisement

“IPOB warns all well-meaning individuals, Igbo leaders, and the public: Cease this degrading pleading immediately. It does not bode well for the rule of law; it smacks of complicity in state-sponsored terrorism and judicial banditry.

“Henceforth, demand for the immediate and unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. He has been discharged and acquitted; no court, not even the Supreme Court, can subvert this without offending the Constitution and inviting anarchy.

“We call on all Biafrans, freedom-loving Nigerians, and the international community to amplify this demand: Obey the law, respect the Constitution, and free Kanu now! Failure to do so exposes the Tinubu regime’s contempt for justice and accelerates the inevitable collapse of this contrived contraption.

Advertisement

“IPOB will not fold its arms while our leader is intimidated into an unjust trial. We urge mass mobilization, including protests, legal actions, and global advocacy, to enforce the Court of Appeal’s verdict. Those who continue begging will be seen as enablers of oppression; history will judge you harshly.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Metro

EFCC Releases Former Sokoto Gov Tambuwal

Published

on

By

The country’s anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, has released the former Governor of Sokoto State, Aminu Tambuwal, after he spent barely 24 hours in custody.

Daily Trust confirmed his release on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The former governor had honoured an invitation by the commission at about 11:16 am on Monday but was subsequently taken into custody.

READ ALSO:

“He has been granted administrative bail. We’ve extracted what we need from him, and he will soon leave our headquarters after perfecting his bail conditions,” an EFCC officer told Daily Trust.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the EFCC spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, is yet to comment on Tambuwal’s release as of the time of filing this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version