Connect with us

News

Confusion As EFCC Joins Kogi Ex-gov, Bello In Amended N100bn Corruption Case

Published

on

There was confusion on Thursday at the Federal High Court in Abuja, following amended charges filed against Alli Bello and Daudu Suleiman, including the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

DAILY POST reports that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, in the amended charge claimed they allegedly diverted about N100 billion belonging to the state government in September 2015, months before former Governor Bello assumed office as Governor.

Governor Bello was not a defendant in the original suit, and was not in court.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: EFCC Increases Charges Against Fayose’s Ally To 24

However, Ali Bello, currently Chief of Staff to Kogi State Governor and Dauda Suleman have denied the fraud allegations in the amended charges brought against them at their fresh arraignment on Thursday in Abuja.

Their plea was taken by Justice James Kolawole Omotoso.

Advertisement

Both Alli Bello and Dauda Suleman vehemently denied the allegations contained in the 17-count amended charges.

Earlier, Alli Bello through his counsel, A.M. Aliyu, SAN, had objected to reading of the amended charges to his client.

His ground of objection was that the anti-graft agency had failed woefully to comply with Section 218 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Nigerians To Pay More As Breweries Again ncreases In Prices Of Beer

The senior lawyer submitted that a copy of the amended charges was not served on them as required by the provisions of the ACJA Act.

EECC lawyer, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, asked the court to reject the arguments of the defendant, adding that the court had on its own endorsed the amendment.

Advertisement

In a brief ruling, Justice Omotoso recalled that he had granted accelerated hearing in the matter and had also ordered that all forms of objections must be kept in abeyance till address stage.

He then directed the Registrar of the Court to read the amended charges.

In the first count, former Governor Yahaya Adoza Bello, Alli Bello and Dauda Suleman were accused of conspiring with each other in September 2015 and converted N80, 246, 470, 089 to their personal use.

Advertisement

They were alleged to have run foul of section 18 (a) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act 2011 because they ought to have reasonably known that the money was a product of fraud and criminal breach of public trust.

READ ALSO: Why I Renamed Minna Airport After Tinubu — Niger Governor

In other charges, Alli Bello and Dauda Suleman were alleged to have concealed several millions of naira with one Rabiu Musa Tafada, a Bureau De Change, BDC, operator trading under Global Venture in Abuja.

Advertisement

Alli Bello’s counsel, Aliyu SAN, at this point, applied that one of the EFCC witnesses, Edward Fanada, be recalled for fresh cross examination in view of the contents of the amended charges.

The request was granted by Justice James Kolawole Omotoso due to no opposition from the EFCC lawyer.

Meanwhile, Justice Omotoso has ordered that Alli Bello and Dauda Suleman should continue to enjoy the bail conditions granted them in the previous charges.

Advertisement

News

FG To Unveil Digital Single Travel Emergency Passport January

Published

on

LThe Federal Government has announced that the Single Travel Emergency Passport (STEP) will be launched in January 2026, offering a digital solution to assist Nigerians abroad who lose their passports.

Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, made the announcement on Friday in Abuja during the launch of the ECOWAS Biometric ID Card.

He said the new system will allow citizens to generate an emergency travel document using any mobile device, eliminating the need to visit an embassy in person.

Advertisement

This initiative will enable Nigerians abroad who lose their passports to generate an emergency travel document using any mobile device without visiting an embassy,” Tunji-Ojo said.

READ ALSO:Immigration Seizes Senator Natasha’s Passport At Airport

He urged Nigerians to trust the government’s capacity to tackle national challenges and called for collective support for ongoing security reforms.

Advertisement

The STEP is expected to complement other digital identity initiatives, including the recently launched ECOWAS National Biometric Identity Card (ENBIC), which facilitates travel within West Africa and strengthens border security.

Earlier this month, the NIS announced that it will introduce the Single Travel Emergency Passport to replace the Emergency Travel Certificate.

The NIS explained that the document will be issued at designated Nigerian embassies and consulates and will be valid for a single entry.

Advertisement

The Service said the initiative forms part of wider reforms to strengthen border governance, enhance identity management, and align its operations with international migration standards.

Continue Reading

News

FCTA Starts Enforcement On 1,095 Revoked Property Titles In Abuja

Published

on

The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has begun enforcement actions on 1,095 revoked property titles in Asokoro, Maitama, Garki, and Wuse districts of Abuja.

Mr Lere Olayinka, Senior Special Assistant to the FCT Minister on Public Communications and Social Media, disclosed the development in a statement on Friday.

He said the titles were revoked due to non-payment of Ground Rent, Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) bills, penalty or violation fees, and land use conversion fees.

Advertisement

Olayinka explained that the enforcement followed the expiration of a 14-day final grace period on Tuesday.

READ ALSO:BREAKING: Bandits Abduct Teenage Boy, Six Girls From FCT Community

He noted that the property owners had disregarded a series of public notices issued by the FCTA from May through November, which appeared in national newspapers, online platforms, and television stations.

Advertisement

The notices instructed defaulters to settle their financial obligations or risk losing their titles.

Based on the foregoing, the general public, particularly holders of property in the FCT, are hereby notified that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Mr Nyesom Wike, has approved the commencement of enforcement actions on 1,095 properties in the territory for defaulting in various payments,” Olayinka stated.

READ ALSO:FCTA Withdraws Park Licences, Directs Fresh Screening Of Operators

Advertisement

He added that the defaults contravene Section 28, Subsections 5(a) and (b) of the Land Use Act and the terms and conditions of grant of the respective Rights of Occupancy.

Following the expiration of the final 14-day grace period, the FCT Administration will carry out enforcement actions on 835 properties for defaulting in payment of Ground Rent and 260 properties for defaulting in payment of Violation Fee and Land Use Conversion Fee,” Olayinka said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Court Orders Release Of 27 Houses Seized By EFCC

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to immediately release 27 houses wrongly seized by the commission.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik issued the order while giving judgment in a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/348/2025 filed by the EFCC.

The EFCC had, on 13 March, obtained an ex-parte interim forfeiture order against the 27 properties, which it claimed were acquired from proceeds of unlawful acts.

Advertisement

Following its publication of the interim forfeiture order in the Punch newspaper on 4 April, as ordered by the court, James Ikechukwu Okwete and his company, Jamec West African Limited, claimed ownership of 26 of the properties, while Adebukunola Iyabode Oladapo showed interest in House No. 12, Fandriana Close, Wuse 2, Abuja.

READ ALSO:

Okwete, Jamec Ltd, and Oladapo objected to the EFCC’s subsequent application for final forfeiture of the properties and, in a judgment on 31 October, Justice Abdulmalik upheld their objection, dismissed the EFCC’s application for final forfeiture, vacated the earlier order for interim forfeiture, and ordered the commission to immediately release the properties.

Advertisement

In the 31 October judgment, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik said, based on her analysis of the evidence presented before the court, “I firmly find that the property owner/respondent’s (Okwete’s) affidavit to show cause has merit.
“Additionally, I hold in favour of Adebukunola Iyabode Oladapo, being the person interested in House No. 12, Fandriana Close, Wuse 2, Abuja, FCT, that since the learned senior counsel for the applicant (EFCC) has informed court that it has no objection to her affidavit to show cause, that her affidavit filed to show cause stands substantiated in its entirety.

“Without more, I forthwith set aside and vacate in its entirety the interim order of forfeiture granted on 13 March 2025 to the applicant in respect of the properties listed in the schedule attached to the applicant’s ex-parte originating motion.
“Accordingly, I order the immediate release of the aforementioned properties and their documents to the property owner/respondent, and House No. 12, Fandriana Close, Wuse 2, Abuja, FCT, to Adebukunola Iyabode Oladapo respectively.

“In that vein, the applicant’s motion for final forfeiture, along with the corresponding responses filed, are now otiose. I so hold,” Justice Abdulmalik said.
However, the lawyer to Okwete and Jamec Ltd, Serekowei Larry, SAN, has written to the Chairman of the EFCC, complaining about the commission’s alleged failure to comply with the judgment.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:

The 27 November letter, written by Larry on behalf of Okwete and Jamec Ltd, reads: “We write as counsel to Mr James Okwete and his company, Jamec West Africa Ltd, ‘the property owners,’ to formally apprise you of the events that have followed this case since 31 October 2025, when judgment was given against you.
“As indicated above, judgment was given by the Federal High Court, coram: Hon. Justice Joyce O. Abdulmalik, on Friday 31 October 2025, in the presence of your counsel, led by Maryam Hayatudeen, Esq.
“On 14 November 2025, the judgment order was served on your good office and nothing was done to obey it.

“On 26 November 2025, the Federal High Court, through its Enforcement Unit led by Mrs Lilian Amenger, proceeded to your office to execute the judgment, which simply required your office to hand over the title documents of the properties, subject matter of the suit, to the officials of the court.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:

“In straight words, your office refused to do so, thereby blatantly disobeying the said judgment, which in its penultimate paragraph used the words ‘the immediate release.’

“In any regime, let alone a democracy, it would be the height of it if judgments of court are blatantly disobeyed. We, however, want to believe that you are not aware of what happened; hence this letter.

Advertisement

“We anticipate your positive reaction within a reasonable time before we take further steps.”

Continue Reading

Trending