Connect with us

News

Edo Guber Results Inflated; APC, PDP Involved In Vote Buying – CSO On Assessment

Published

on

…raises concern over electoral violence, others

By Kanjo Ebi Joseph|Benin 

A civil society organisation – Kimpact Development Initiative (KDI) – says the results of the Edo State governorship election declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on September 22, 2024 were inflated by 6.04 per cent.

INFO DAILY reports that the governorship election was conducted on September 21st, 2024, and at the end of the election, the INEC declared Senator Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress winner of the gubernatorial election.

Advertisement

But KDI, in a post election assessment statement titled: ‘Addressing Electoral Challenges: Assessing Electoral Security Accountability and Ballot Integrity in the 2024 Edo Governorship Election,’ and made available to INFO DAILY, said “using the Ballot Integrity Project (BIP) methodology,” which according to the body detected “margin of error of ±2%,” it findings “raise critical concerns regarding the integrity of the result management process in the election.”

KDI noted that this discrepancy detected at its end “casts serious doubt on the transparency and
credibility of the collation process.”

The CSO noted: “KDI has consistently noted with concern the long-standing issues in Nigeria’s
result collation process, which remains susceptible to human error and system failures. We are deeply concerned about the usual rituals at the collation centers, where stakeholders’ frequently raised concerns, are often met with the standard response:
“Point noted”.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: CSOs Reject Edo Election Results, Allege Electoral Violations

“No administrative steps are taken to assess the merit or demerit of these concerns. This has been an observable trend from previous elections and the election in
Edo State, despite Section 65 of the Electoral Act empowering INEC to review election results within seven days of their announcement. Additionally, INEC’s own 2022 Guidelines and Regulations for the Conduct of Elections (Section 99) expounds this administrative power.

“Our BIP analysis shows a 6.04% inflation in the results declared by INEC. Ideally, results
should either decrease during the collation process—due to cancellations prompted by
issues like violence or BVAS bypasses—or remain consistent if no such cancellations
occurred. However, we noticed an increase or addition in the number of votes in some
collation centers.”

Advertisement

“Moreover, while all 18 LGA Returning Officers and Electoral Officers (EOs) reported no
cancellations during the state-level collation, our analysis shows that at least 22 polling units had Form EC40G uploaded on IReV, indicating disruptions or BVAS-related
issues.

“The Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) collected in these polling units exceed the margin of lead based on the IReV-collated results, raising concerns about the accuracy of the declared outcome. This indicates a high likelihood of a supplementary election in
the 2024 Edo state governorship elections if PU results on IREV were consistent with
what was declared.

READ ALSO: #EdoDecides: Vote Buying Was More Of Systemic Than Open Transactions – CSO

Advertisement

“Additionally, INEC stated that 604,132 voters were accredited, yielding 570,690 valid votes and 13,275 rejected ballots, resulting in a total of 583,965 votes cast. This leads to a discrepancy of 20,167 accredited voters whose votes were omitted from both the valid and rejected vote classifications. If no votes were cancelled, as reported by INEC returning officials from LGAs, this raises a pertinent question: Where are the 20,167 missing votes?

KDI, while urging INEC to thoroughly examine the quality of training provided to its adhoc staff and to investigate any potential instances of sabotage within the process, noted that “an examination of Form EC8A on IREV reveals distinct instances of overvoting in more than 300 polling units across 14 local government areas.”

Vote trading

In the statement, KDI said despite warnings, politicians were seen buying votes openly as observed by its observers field during the election

Advertisement

KDI stated: “In Ward 7, PU 9 -Aiyegunle, by Chief Aliu’s Compund (Akoko Edo LGA), money was exchanged openly, with reports
of a political party distributing N10,000 to voters without restraint. In Ward 12 (Orhionmwon LGA), vote trading was blatant, with APC and PDP engaging in this
practice—buying votes with a minimum fee of ₦5,000 and as high as ₦10,000. In Ward
7, PU 16 (Esan West LGA), political parties were said to have paid up to ₦12,000 to voters.

“KDI’s EDDR recorded isolated actions taken by security agents to deter vote trading. For instance, officers of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arrested a vote buyer in Ward 5, PU 37 (Oredo LGA), and some political party supporters
were apprehended in Ikpoba Okha LGA for engaging in vote buying.

READ ALSO: Edo Poll: CSO Expresses Concern Over Security Situation, Likely Vote Buying

Advertisement

“In Iguobazuwa East, PU 11 (Ovia South West LGA), security personnel were called in to resolve a dispute over allegations that a political party supporters was distributing ₦5,000 per vote.

“More egregious cases of vote trading were documented in Ward 1, PU 9 (Ovia South West LGA), where vote buying occurred, and in Ward 6, PU 6 (Ovia North East LGA), which saw a well organized vote trading.

“Blatant instances were recorded in Ward 5, PU 18 & 19, as well as Ward 6, PU 14 of Ovia Southwest. Ikpoba Okha LGA saw widespread vote trading, with party agents offering refreshments and distributing materials such as pasta to sway voters.

Advertisement

“Several other incidents of vote trading were recorded across Uhunmwonde, where voters were paid as little as ₦1,000 in some polling units, indicating the pervasive nature of this problem. These developments
underscore the ongoing challenge of vote trading in Nigerian elections, threatening the integrity of the electoral process Issues around Permanent Voter Cards (PVC)”

Electoral violence

The civil society organisation in its assessment statement said it received “over 1,247 reports via calls and messages through its EDDR, with 17 of these reports directly involving
incidents of electoral violence.”

KDI added: “Among the most notable cases was ballot box
snatching, particularly in Ward 10, PU 7 of Etsako Central, where a suspected political party supporter allegedly seized a ballot box upon realizing that his party was likely to
lose.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Police Arrest Two For Transformer, Cable Thefts In Edo

“Additional reports of ballot box snatching surfaced in Egor LGA. Such actions do not only disrupt the electoral proceedings but also undermine the democratic rights of
voters, necessitating immediate investigations and enhanced security measures to
prevent future occurrences.”

Recommendations

KDI to reduce human error and increase efficiency, INEC “should prioritize the adoption of automated systems for result collation and management.”

Advertisement

According to the CSO, “This will enhance accuracy, minimize delays, and improve the transparency of the election results.”

It added: “Automated systems should be robust, easy to audit, and designed to mitigate potential cybersecurity threats.”

On electoral violence, KDI said: “Electoral stakeholders must intensify efforts to combat vote trading by closely
collaborating with security agencies, civil society organizations, and election
observers.

Advertisement

“Strict enforcement of electoral laws, especially those concerning vote trading, should be a priority, with a focus on prosecuting offenders to send a strong
message that electoral malpractice will not be tolerated.”

 

Advertisement

News

IELTS Speaking: How Nigerian Candidates Can Improve Their Band Score

Published

on

For most Nigerian candidates applying to study, work or migrate abroad, the IELTS Speaking test is the single most nerve-wracking 11 to 14 minutes of the entire exam.

Unlike Listening or Reading, there is no answer sheet to fall back on, and the pressure of speaking directly to a trained examiner can make it easy to freeze or, just as damagingly, over-prepare until you sound robotic.

The good news is that the test is graded against four public, named criteria, rather than a vague impression of how confident you sounded. Understanding exactly what each criterion rewards can therefore be one of the fastest ways to improve your band score.

Advertisement

Understand what the examiner is listening for

Every Speaking test is scored equally across four categories: Fluency and Coherence, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy, and Pronunciation, each worth 25 percent of the final band.

Fluency and Coherence measures whether you can keep talking without excessive hesitation, and whether your ideas connect logically rather than jumping around.

Advertisement

Lexical Resource measures the range and precision of your vocabulary, including whether you can paraphrase a question instead of repeating the examiner’s own words back at them.

Grammatical range and accuracy looks at how varied and accurate your sentence structures are, from simple statements to more complex clauses using words like although, because, or if.

Pronunciation covers clarity, stress, and intonation, not whether you sound like a native speaker from a particular country.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: New Air Traffic Control Failure Delays Flights At UK Airports

This last point matters enormously for Nigerian candidates specifically: a Nigerian accent does not lower your score. IELTS examiners are trained to assess intelligibility, not accent neutrality, and both the British Council and IELTS Australia explicitly confirm that speaking with an accent is not penalised as long as your pronunciation is clear enough to be understood without strain.

What actually costs marks is mumbling, running words together so meaning is lost, or shifting stress patterns so unpredictably that the examiner has to work to follow you. Focus your practice on clarity, not on erasing an accent that was never the problem.

Advertisement

Never memorise answers

One of the biggest mistakes candidates can make in the Speaking test is relying on a memorised response, particularly in Part 2, the two-minute monologue based on a task card.

Examiners listen to many candidates and are trained to recognise rehearsed language, whether it is a pre-written answer or a generic template adapted to whatever topic appears.

Advertisement

A scripted answer can sound stiff, contain unnaturally advanced vocabulary that does not match the rest of the candidate’s speech, or ignore the specific details of the task card in favour of prepared content.

When an examiner detects this, it can affect your Fluency and Coherence score because genuine coherence comes from responding directly to what was asked, rather than delivering a monologue prepared in advance.

The solution is not to avoid preparation. Instead, prepare a structure rather than memorising sentences.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Race To Find Survivors As Morocco Quake Deaths Top 1,300

For Part 2, practise a flexible structure that covers the setup, specific details, a turning point or reflection, and what you think about the subject now. Then fill that structure with fresh details based on the topic you receive on test day.

This gives you the organisation examiners reward without the unnatural delivery of a memorised script.

Advertisement

Use natural fillers and steady pace, not dramatic slowdown

It is perfectly acceptable to pause briefly to think. Natural fillers such as “That’s an interesting question” or “Let me think about that” can give you time to organise a more complex response without necessarily costing you marks.

Used sparingly, such phrases can sound like normal discourse markers rather than signs of weakness.

Advertisement

However, dramatically slowing down your speech to avoid mistakes is not a good strategy.

Multiple examiner-facing sources emphasise that speaking too slowly can be just as problematic as speaking too quickly. Fluency and Coherence partly involve how naturally your language flows, and an overly cautious pace can make your speech sound unnatural or uncertain.

READ ALSO: UK Skilled Worker Visa: 10 Ways To Prepare For Your Interview

Advertisement

The target is a steady, natural pace — similar to how you would explain something to a friend. You do not need to race through your answers, but you also should not deliberately stretch every sentence.

If you genuinely do not understand a question, do not guess or pretend you do. Politely asking the examiner to repeat or rephrase the question is explicitly stated by the British Council to have no effect on your score.

That is safer than answering a question you did not understand, because an irrelevant or confused response can affect your coherence more than a brief request for clarification.

Advertisement

Use idioms only when they actually fit

Rare or idiomatic vocabulary can contribute to a strong Lexical Resource score, as the official descriptors reward the natural use of less common and idiomatic vocabulary.

The key word, however, is naturally.

Advertisement

Using an idiom simply because you memorised it from a study list can work against you if it does not fit the context, is mispronounced or sounds rehearsed.

An expression that is forced into an answer can make your speech sound unnatural and may suggest that you are relying on memorised language rather than demonstrating genuine vocabulary range.

READ ALSO: Putin Issues ‘Veiled Threat’ To UK Over Support For Ukraine

Advertisement

One or two well-placed idiomatic expressions used correctly and naturally can therefore be more useful than filling your answers with several memorised phrases.

If you are not confident about an expression or it does not come to you naturally, use a clear, simple sentence instead. A natural response is preferable to a complicated phrase that is confused, forced or mispronounced.

FAQs

Advertisement

Does a strong Nigerian accent negatively impact an applicant’s final IELTS speaking score?

No. Examiners assess pronunciation for clarity and intelligibility, not for how closely you sound like a native speaker of a specific variety of English. A Nigerian accent is not penalised as long as your speech is clear enough to be easily understood; unclear articulation or unpredictable stress patterns are what actually cost marks, regardless of accent.

What should a candidate do if they completely misunderstand the examiner’s question?

Advertisement

Ask the examiner to repeat or rephrase it. This is explicitly permitted and, according to the British Council, does not affect your score. Guessing at an answer to a question you didn’t understand is far riskier, since it can produce an off-topic or confused response that damages your Coherence score.

How does using rare idioms correctly boost the Lexical Resource score in the IELTS exam?

Correctly used idiomatic language demonstrates the range and flexibility that the official Band 7 and above descriptors specifically call for, which can meaningfully lift a Lexical Resource score. The key word is correctly: a forced, mispronounced, or contextually awkward idiom has the opposite effect, since examiners are trained to notice when an expression sounds rehearsed or doesn’t fit the sentence around it.
(TRIBUNE)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Group Commends COREN For Training Engineers In Engineering Failure, Forensic Investigation In Nigeria

Published

on

Foundation for the Development of Shira Community (FODESCO) in Shira Local Government Area of Bauchi state has commended the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN) for conducting a pioneer training on Engineering Failure and Forensic Investigation (EFFI) for 50 licensed engineering practitioners across the country.

Engr. Shehu Wakili, the Chairman of the Foundation made the commendation in an interview with newsmen on Friday.

According to him, the training which was conducted by COREN in collaboration with the Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI) and the Chartered Institute of Forensic and Certified Fraud Investigators of Nigeria (CIFCFIN), was to equip engineers and professionals from academia, industry, and government MDAs with practical skills to investigate infrastructure failures and prevent recurring building collapses.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: ICPC, COREN Working To Curb Quackery In Engineering — Don

He added that the training was also to build a pool of trained specialists who could investigate building collapses and other engineering failures, determine their root causes, and recommend measures to prevent recurrence, saying that the trainees would form part of a register of trained and certified forensic engineering investigators.

He further lauded COREN for the subsequent induction of its member, Engr. Abdullahi Muhammad MNSE, who among the 50 participants, hails from Bauchi state as a Chartered Engineering Forensic and Failure Investigator (CEFFI), certified by CIFCFIN.

Advertisement

“FODESCO is proud of him and wishes him well in all his endeavours”, he prayed.

Wakili, also the Chairman, Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE), Bauchi state chapter, revealed that the training covered failure analysis, forensic investigation methodologies, risk assessment, and professional reporting.

“This initiative supports broader efforts by COREN and the National Assembly to enforce stricter building codes, identify quackery, and ensure accountability across the construction sector,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

NBS: Lagos, Rivers, Enugu Top List As States Generated N5.15trn In 2025

Published

on

The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) has disclosed that 36 states and the FCT generated a total of ₦5.15 trillion in 2025, indicating a growth rate of 40.93 percent from ₦3.65 trillion recorded in 2024.

NBS stated on Thursday citing the Nigeria Revenue Service ( NRS) as source of its information that Lagos emerged top on the list of states with the highest revenue generation in the sum of ₦1.77 trillion.

“Followed by Rivers state ₦428.42 billion and Enugu with IGR record of ₦406.77 billion in the period referenced.”

Advertisement

The. Bureau said Yobe, Ebonyi and Sokoto states reported the least revenues with ₦16.01 billion, ₦17.18 billion and ₦20.48 billion, respectively.

READ ALSO: Trump Bans CNN, Others From White House Coverage, Gives Reason

According to NBS, Pay As You Earn (PAYE) was the most tax revenue recorded during the period, valued at ₦2.64 trillion, representing 69.51 percent of the total tax revenue collected, while capital gains tax was the least with ₦12.40 billion while the share of total tax revenue to total IGR was 73.64 percent nationally.

Advertisement

“Other states and their share of IGR are FCT – N356.34 billion, Ogun – N252.36 billion, Delta – N202.49 billion, Edo – N132.21 billion, Oyo – N103.25 billion and Kano – N102.26 billion.

“Ten other states in lowest category of IGR include Yobe – N16.01 billion, Ebonyi – N17.18 billion, Sokoto – N20.48 billion, Taraba – N28.16 billion ; Benue – N29.57 billion, Zamfara – N30.07 billion, Kebbi – N31.23 billion, Nasarawa – N32.57 billion, Adamawa – N33.76 billion andcBorno – N36.36 billion “.

READ ALSO: Nigeria’s Economy Grew By 3.13% In Q1 2025 — NBS

Advertisement

NBS noted that the states generated their most and least revenue from taxes and other government sources. “PAYE was the dominant revenue source nationally, generating N2.64 trillion and accounting for 69.51% of total tax revenue for the year.

“Other sources included direct assessment, road taxes, stamp duties, withholding taxes and capital gains tax, which was the smallest contributor at N12.40 billion,” the Bureau stated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending