Connect with us

News

#EdoDecides: APC, PDP Agents Seen Bribing Voters – Yiaga

Published

on

Yiaga Africa says agents of the APC and PDP, two major parties taking part in the Edo governorship election, were seen buying votes with N10,000 each in some polling units

Yiaga Africa in its interim report stated: “APC and PDP party agents were seen bribing voters with cash (N10,000) at the Igueben – Idumoka Pri School polling unit (12-10-03-004) Ward 1 in Igueben LGA. Party agents for APC and PDP were also seen handing out cash gifts (N10,000) in Enikaro – Enikaro Primary School IX Polling Unit (12-11-07-009) in Ugbekun ward, Ikpoba/Okha LGA,” the report stated.

In the report, YIAGA also highlighted factors that undermined the election.

Advertisement

The organisation, in a statement on Saturday, said it deployed the Process and Results Verification for Transparency (PRVT) methodology to observe the governorship election.

The statement signed by Aisha Abdullahi, the chair of the 2024 Edo election mission, said the PRVT enables the organisation to independently assess the quality of election day processes and verify the accuracy of the official election results as announced by INEC.

After the polls close, observers will observe the results collation process at both the LGA and state levels, ensuring timely and accurate reporting of the election process,” the statement said.

Advertisement

Yiaga noted that despite a tense political climate, the Edo governorship election began peacefully with minimal incidents.

Nigerians need credible journalism. Help us report it.
Support journalism driven by facts, created by Nigerians for Nigerians. Our thorough, researched reporting relies on the support of readers like you.

READ ALSO: #EdoDecides: Vote Buying Was More Of Systemic Than Open Transactions – CSO

Advertisement

Help us maintain free and accessible news for all with a small donation.

Every contribution guarantees that we can keep delivering important stories —no paywalls, just quality journalism.

However, it said logistical challenges caused delays in the commencement of accreditation and voting in several polling units.

Advertisement

As predicted in Yiaga Africa’s pre-election statement, late openings were attributed to logistical issues and poor weather conditions, such as rainfall. Voters patiently waited to cast their votes despite these delays.”

It added that the lack of vehicles to transport ad hoc officials and election materials and the absence of security personnel to accompany them further contributed to the delays.

It said most polling units observed had security officials, but the distribution of security personnel was uneven, resulting in limited security presence in some densely populated polling units.

Advertisement

The organisation said it is concerned by reports of intimidation of INEC officials to bypass the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) in Akoko-Edo LGA, missing results sheets in Polling Unit 1 in Ward 8, Orhionmwon LGA, and disruptions caused by political thugs chasing voters from Polling Unit 5 in Uwessan Ward 2, Esan Central LGA.

READ ALSO: Edo Decides: Police Arrest Political Thugs, Party Loyalists For Vote Buying, Recover Cash, Incriminating Items

These infractions, it said, risk voter suppression and election manipulation.

Advertisement

Yiaga Africa called on INEC to strictly enforce its guidelines and to resist any pressure to deviate from the electoral legal framework.

The organisation commended the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and security agencies for their swift action in arresting suspected vote-buyers at polling units in Egor and Oredo LGAs.

It said the commission should extend its operations to other LGAs where votes are being traded for N10,000 per voter even in the presence of security personnel.

Advertisement

The Nigeria Police is also applauded for arresting and disarming political thugs with firearms on the eve of the election, contributing to a more secure election day environment,” it said.

The organisation said initial findings are based on reports received from 287 of the 300 sampled polling units and processed at 1:30 pm on election day.

“Additional information and updates will be provided subsequently,” it said.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Edo Decides: Police Arrest Political Thugs, Party Loyalists For Vote Buying, Recover Cash, Incriminating Items

On the arrival of INEC officials and commencement of polls in the polling units observed, Yiaga Africa noted a slow start to the voting process, with INEC officials arriving in only 43 per cent of polling units by 7:30 a.m.

It explained that the geographical breakdown shows that there was a late arrival of INEC officials in 69 per cent of polling units in Edo North, 35 per cent in Edo Central, and 56 per cent in Edo South.

Advertisement

It noted that most INEC officials did not arrive by 7:30 a.m. By 8:30 a.m., only 17 per cent of the polling units had opened for accreditation and voting, while by 9:30 a.m., 65 per cent had commenced the voting process.

On material deployment, Yiaga said there was adequate deployment of election materials like the voters’ register, voting cubicle, official stamp, Ink pad, and indelible ink in the polling units observed.

The organisation also noted the deployment of assistive materials for persons with disability, with magnifying glasses deployed in 27 per cent of the polling units, braille ballot guide in 38 per cent of polling units and PWD posters in 84 per cent of polling units.

Advertisement

On the deployment of the BVAS, the organisation observed that every polling unit had a BVAS deployed.

Additionally, it noted that 6 per cent of the polling units had two or more BVAS machines deployed. However, in 2 per cent of polling units, the BVAS accreditation count was not shown to voters to confirm that it was set to zero before the start of accreditation and voting.

READ ALSO: Edo Guber: Soldiers Foil Attempted Invasion Of INEC Office

Advertisement

On the deployment of party agents, it said All Progressives Congress (APC) party agents were sighted at 98 per cent of polling units, Labour Party (LP) agents were in 77 per cent of polling Units, and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) agents were in 99 per cent of polling units.

On the deployment of security personnel, it added that security agents were seen in 95 per cent of polling units.

According to the statement, as of 1:40 p.m., the Yiaga Africa WTV Data Center received 16 verified critical incident reports primarily relating to the late opening of polls.

Advertisement

The organisation said it received reports of four polling units that failed to open. This incident, it said, was reported in two polling units in Egor, one in Esan South East, and one in Etsako West.

It further explained that the BVAS malfunctioned in Ayogwiri Town Hall, Ayogwiri Polling Unit, of Uzairure South East ward in Etsako West LGA. As of 1 p.m., voting had not commenced in the polling unit.

According to the statement, voters halted the accreditation and voting process in the Ikpoba Army Children XI polling unit (12-11-01-011) in Iwogban/Uteh Ward, Ikpoba/Okha LGA because INEC officials arrived without the official stamp.

Advertisement

At Ebua Market Square in Uhunwode LGA, an altercation between APC and PDP supporters over alleged bribery led to the suspension of voting and the destruction of the voting cubicle. Political thugs also disrupted voting at Anyaran Araromi Primary School in Akoko Edo LGA,” it said.

Yiaga said its observers reported incidents of vote buying in Ikpoba/Okha, Igueben, Esan West, Akoko Edo, Owan West and Uhunmode LGAs.

“APC and PDP party agents were seen bribing voters with cash (N10,000) at the Igueben – Idumoka Pri School polling unit (12-10-03-004) Ward 1 in Igueben LGA. Party agents for APC and PDP were also seen handing out cash gifts (N10,000) in Enikaro – Enikaro Primary School IX Polling Unit (12-11-07-009) in Ugbekun ward, Ikpoba/Okha LGA,” it said.

Advertisement

 

News

Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Tells FG To Retaliate Against South African Companies In Nigeria

Published

on

By

Senator Adams Oshiomhole has called on the Federal Government to retaliate against South African businesses operating in Nigeria following the recent attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

Speaking during plenary on Tuesday, Oshiomhole said the Federal Government should consider revoking the working license of South African owned companies such as MTN and DSTV.

He argued that Nigeria must respond firmly to what he described as persistent hostility against its citizens.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:South Africa To Investigate ‘Mystery’ Of Planeload Of Palestinians

“I am not going to shed tears. If you hit me, I hit you. I think it is appropriate in diplomacy. It is an economic struggle,” Oshiomhole said.

He argued that while some South Africans accuse Nigerians of taking their jobs, Nigerians should return home and take over employment opportunities created by major South African companies operating in the country, including MTN and DSTV.

Advertisement

When we hit back, the President of South Africa will not only talk but will also go on his knees to recognise that Nigeria cannot be intimidated.

READ ALSO:South African Ambassador Found Dead Outside Paris Hotel

We will not condone any life being lost. If a crime has been committed under the South African law they have the right to bring any such person to justice, but to kill our people as if we are helpless, we will not allow that,” Oshiomhole added.

Advertisement

DAILY POST reports that several Nigerians in South Africa have reportedly been attacked, and their businesses destroyed, in ongoing xenophobic attacks in the country.

Continue Reading

News

IGP Orders Officers Display Name Tag On Uniform, Gives Update On State Police

Published

on

By

The Inspector General of Police, IGP, Tunji Disu, has ordered all police personnel to always have their name tags on their uniforms for easy identification.

Disu disclosed that only police personnel who are undercover are exempted from displaying their name tags.

Speaking on Tuesday, Disu said: “All police officers should have their name tags. All of us on the high table have our names apart from the undercover among us so if you look at all the Commissioners of Police we have our name tags, so it’s not our standard.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:

All the Commissioners of Police are here and that is why we called this meeting, we have list of things like this that we will want to discuss with the Commissioners of Police, we have told them earlier and we will still let them know that every that happens within their area of jurisdiction falls under their control.”

On the issue of state police, the IGP said: “Since we got the signal that the Federal Government of Nigeria intend to establish State Police and since we are the federal police, we decided to take the bull by the horn and put down our own side of what we believe on how the state police should be run.

Advertisement

“A lot of things were taken into consideration, a lot of comparative analysis was done and it has been transmitted to the National Assembly.”

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Court Orders SERAP To Pay DSS Operatives N100m For Defamation

Published

on

By

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has ordered a non-governmental organization, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, to pay N100 million as damaged to two operatives of the Department of the State Services, DSS, for unjustly defaming them in some publications.

The court also ordered SERAP to tender public apologies to the defamed officers,
Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, in two national newspapers, two television stations and its website.

Besides, the organization was also ordered to pay the two operatives N1 million as cost of litigation and 10 percent post-judgment interest annually on the judgment sum until it’s fully liquidated.

Advertisement

Justice Yusuf Halilu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory gave the order on Tuesday while delivering judgment in a N5.5 billion defamation suit instituted against SERAP by the DSS operatives.

The judge found SERAP liable for unjustly defaming the two DSS operatives with allegations that they unlawfully invaded its Abuja office, harassed and intimidated its staff, in September 2024.

READ ALSO:How We Arrested Terror Suspect Who Threatened To Kill Students, Teachers In Abuja — DSS

Advertisement

In the offending publication on its website and Twitter handle, SERAP alleged that the two operatives unlawfully invaded and occupied its office with sinister motives.

The judge held that the publication was in bad taste especially from an organization established to promote transparency and accountability, as nothing in the publication was found to be truthful.

The DSS staff had listed SERAP as 1st defendant in the suit marked CV/4547/2024. SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, was listed as the 2nd defendant.

Advertisement

In the suit, the claimants – Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele – accused the two defendants of making false claims that they invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024..

Counsel to the DSS, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, had while adopting his final address in the mater urged the judge to grant all the reliefs sought by his client in the interest of justice.

READ ALSO:DSS Arrests Suspected Gunrunner, Recovers 832 Rounds Of Ammunition

Advertisement

He admitted that although the names of the two claimants were not mentioned in the defamation materials, they had however established substantial circumstances that they are the ones referred to in the published defamation article by SERAP on its website.

The counsel submitted that all ingredients of defamation have been clearly established and the offending publication referred to the two officials of the secret police.

However, SERAP, through its counsel, Victoria Bassey from Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, law firm, asked the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the two claimants did not establish that they were the ones referred to in the alleged defamation materials.

Advertisement

She said that SERAP used “DSS officials” in the alleged offending publication, adding that the two claimants must establish that they are the ones referred to before their case can succeed.

Similar arguments were canvassed by Oluwatosin Adefioye who stood for the second defendant, adding that there was no dispute in the September 9, 2024 operation of DSS in SERAP’s office.

READ ALSO:Alleged Cyberstalking: DSS Plays Video Evidence In Sowore’s Trial

Advertisement

He said that since SERAP in the publication did not name any particular person, the claimants must plead special circumstances that they were the ones referred to as the DSS officials.

Besides, he said that there is no organization by name Department of State Services in law, hence, DSS cannot claim being defamed adding that the only entity known to law is National Security Agency.

The claimants had in the suit stated that the alleged false claim by SERAP has negatively impacted on their reputation.

Advertisement

The DSS also stated, in the statement of claim, that, in line with the agency’s practice of engaging with officials of non-governmental organisations operating in the FCT to establish a relationship with their new leadership, it directed the two officials – John and Ogunleye – to visit SERAP’s office and invite them for a familiarization meeting.

The claimants added that in carrying out the directive, John and Ogunleye paid a friendly visit to SERAP’s office at 18 Bamako Street, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja on September 9 and met with one Ruth, who upon being informed about the purpose of the visit, claimed that none of SERAP’s management staff was in the country and advised that a formal letter of invitation be written by the DSS.

READ ALSO:DSS, Police Partner NCCSALW To End Terrorism, Mop Up Illegal Arms

Advertisement

John and Ogundele, who claimed that their interactions with Ruth were recorded, said before they immediately exited SERAP’s office, Ruth promised to inform her organisation’s management about the visit and volunteered a phone number – 08160537202.

They said it was surprising that, shortly after their visit, SERAP posted on its X (Twitter) handle – @SERAPNigeria – that officers of the DSS are presently unlawfully occupying its office.

The claimant added, “On the same day, the defendants also published a statement on SERAP’s website, which was widely reported by several media outfits, falsely alleging that some officers from the DSS, described as “a tall, large, dark-skinned woman” and “a slim, dark skinned man,” invaded their Abuja office and interrogated the staff of the first defendant (SERAP).

Advertisement

John and Ogundele stated that “due to the false statements published by the defendants, the DSS has been ridiculed and criticised by international agencies such as the Amnesty International and prominent members of the Nigerian society, such as Femi Falana (SAN)”.

“Due to the false statements published by the defendants, members of the public and the international community formed the opinion that the Federal Government is using the DSS to harass the defendants.”

READ ALSO:SERAP To Court: Stop CBN From ‘Implementing ‘Unlawful, Unjust ATM Fee Hike’

Advertisement

They added that the defendants’ statements caused harm to their reputation because the staff and management of the DSS have formed the opinion that the claimants did not follow orders and carried out an unsanctioned operation and are therefore, incompetent and unprofessional.

The claimants therefore prayed the court for the following reliefs: “An order directing the defendants to tender an apology to the claimants via the first defendant’s (SERAP’s) website, X (twitter) handle, two national daily newspapers (Punch and Vanguard) and two national news television stations (Arise Television and Channels Television) for falsely accusing the claimants of unlawfully invading the first defendant’s office and interrogating the first defendant’s staff.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N5 billion as damages for the libellous statements published about the claimants.

Advertisement

“Interest on the sum of N5b at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the date of judgment until the judgment sum is realised or liquidated.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N50 million as costs of this action.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version