Connect with us

News

EXPLAINER: Why Jonathan May Not Be Eligible To Contest In 2027

Published

on

There have been fresh calls for former President Goodluck Jonathan to contest the 2027 presidential election amid ongoing realignments within opposition parties.

Jonathan served as Vice President to the late President Umaru Yar’Adua from 2007 until Yar’Adua’s death in May 2010, after which he was sworn in as President.

He subsequently won the 2011 presidential election but lost his re-election bid in 2015 to former President Muhammadu Buhari.

Advertisement

Since leaving office, Jonathan has gained international recognition for conceding defeat in 2015 and ensuring a peaceful transfer of power.

Amid the internal crisis within the Peoples Democratic Party and reported efforts by opposition figures to court him, questions have emerged over his eligibility to contest again.

READ ALSO:2027: Run, Jonathan Run — Canada-based Group Urges Ex-President To Contest For President

Advertisement

However, some legal experts argue that provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) may prevent him from seeking another term.

The PUNCH reviewed relevant provisions of the Constitution that have been central to the debate.

Section 137(3) of the Constitution, introduced by the Fourth Alteration in 2017, states that “a person who was sworn-in as President to complete the term for which another person was elected as President shall not be elected to such office for more than a single term.”

Advertisement

However, Section 137(3) was enacted in 2017, after Jonathan had left office, raising questions about whether the provision can be applied retroactively.

A similar provision is contained in Section 182(3) of the Constitution, which applies to governors.

READ ALSO:Why I, Jonathan Opposed Tambuwal’s Emergence As Speaker — Obasanjo

Advertisement

Section 182(3) states that “a person who was sworn-in as governor to complete the term for which another person was elected as governor shall not be elected to such office for more than a single term.”

The issue has drawn renewed attention following a recent Federal High Court ruling in Akure, Ondo State, which held that Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa would be ineligible to seek another term beyond the constitutional limit.

Aiyedatiwa, who was sworn in to complete the tenure of the late Governor Rotimi Akeredolu in December 2023, was later elected in November 2024 and inaugurated in February 2025.

Advertisement

In the suit filed by an APC member, Akin Egbuwalo, the court was asked to interpret constitutional provisions relating to tenure limits.

The court held that no elected executive can remain in office beyond the constitutionally permitted period, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Marwa v. Nyako.

READ ALSO:2027: PDP Northern Group Endorses Jonathan For Presidency

Advertisement

The ruling has been cited by some analysts as reinforcing the argument that individuals who complete a predecessor’s tenure and subsequently win election may not exceed the constitutional limit.

However, legal opinions remain divided on whether the same interpretation applies to Jonathan, particularly given that the relevant constitutional amendment came after his tenure.

The Aiyedatiwa ruling suggests Jonathan cannot contest again since the constitutional principle is the same.

Advertisement

But many politicians and experts have historically contested this interpretation, and it may likely require a fresh court ruling to settle definitively.
(PUNCH)

News

UK Court Closes Diezani Trial As Jury Prepares Verdict

Published

on

The defence and prosecution have closed their cases in the ongoing trial of former Nigerian Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, at the Southwark Crown Court in the United Kingdom, with a jury now set to deliver its verdict later this week.

Alison-Madueke is standing trial alongside oil executive Olatimbo Ayinde and her brother, Doye Agama, on a five-count charge bordering on alleged bribery. All three defendants have pleaded not guilty.

British prosecutors allege that the former minister received bribes in the form of luxury items and high-value properties from oil industry actors seeking favourable treatment in the award of oil contracts during her tenure between 2010 and 2015.

Advertisement

The prosecution maintains that such benefits were improperly received and argues that there is no documentary evidence supporting claims of reimbursement or legitimate financial transactions backing the alleged transfers.

READ ALSO:Court Orders Final Forfeiture Of UK Property Linked To Useni, Ozekhome

In his closing submissions, defence counsel Jonathan Laidlaw accused the prosecution of failing to charge alleged bribe givers and relying on what he described as incomplete and unreliable evidence.

Advertisement

He questioned the handling of evidence from a 2015 raid on Alison-Madueke’s Abuja residence, alleging procedural irregularities, including the absence of key officials during the operation and lack of photographic records of items in their original locations.

Laidlaw further argued that critical documents that could support the defence case—such as records relating to reimbursements and official ministerial duties—were missing. He also faulted the prosecution’s reliance on evidence linked to Nigeria’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), while challenging its rejection of parts of the same material in relation to co-defendant Ayinde.

He also disputed claims that official travel and financial records relating to the former minister were unavailable, describing the prosecution’s position as inconsistent.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:UK Rolls Out Digital Visit Visas For Nigerians

Responding, lead prosecutor Alexandra Healy maintained that oil executives provided improper benefits to the former minister while their companies benefited from lucrative state contracts. She argued that such arrangements were incompatible with public office and unsupported by any documentary evidence of reimbursement.

Healy further referenced a £1 million payment linked to businessman Benedict Peters, describing the use of intermediary structures as a deliberate attempt to conceal the nature of the transaction.

Advertisement

She also noted that Alison-Madueke had been aware of the investigation for nearly a decade.

With both sides having completed their submissions, the jury is expected to return its verdict later this week.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Sleep Timing Irregularity Could Double Risk Of Heart Attack, Experts Warn

Published

on

Experts have warned that going to bed at different times each night, particularly during midlife, could be an early warning sign of future heart problems.

New research from the University of Oulu found a strong link between irregular bedtimes and an increased risk of major cardiovascular events, especially among people who spend less than eight hours in bed each night.

According to the study, individuals whose sleep schedules varied widely and whose time in bed was under eight hours faced roughly twice the risk of serious heart-related events compared with those who maintained more regular routines.

Advertisement

In contrast, irregular wake-up times did not show a clear association with cardiovascular problems.

READ ALSO:Eating Takeout Food Often May Increase Heart Disease Risk — Study

Major cardiovascular events examined in the study included conditions requiring specialised medical care, such as heart attack and ischaemic stroke.

Advertisement

The research, published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, followed 3,231 individuals born in northern Finland in 1966. Their sleep habits were monitored over a one-week period at age 46, while their health outcomes were tracked for more than a decade using healthcare register data.

Researchers measured sleep duration and timing using activity monitors that recorded how long participants remained in bed. The findings pointed to bedtime consistency as a particularly important factor for heart health.

Laura Nauha, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oulu, explained that earlier studies had already linked irregular sleep patterns to cardiovascular risks.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Sleeping Late Can Trigger Heart Disease Later In life, Scientists Warn

However, she noted that this study is the first to show that variability in bedtime, wake-up time, and the midpoint of the sleep period are independently associated with major cardiovascular events.

According to Nauha, everyday routines play a major role in shaping long-term heart health.

Advertisement

Maintaining a regular sleep schedule is one factor that most of us can influence,” she said.

“Our findings suggest that the regularity of bedtime, in particular, may be important for heart health. It reflects the rhythms of everyday life and how much they fluctuate,” Nauha added.
(Nigerian Tribune)

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

NMA Threatens N1bn Suit Against EFCC Over Alleged Assault On UUTH Professor

Published

on

The Nigerian Medical Association, NMA, Akwa Ibom State Council, has concluded plans to initiate a one billion naira suit against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, over the alleged assault of its member, Professor Eyo Ekpe, a Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery at the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, UUTH.

This was among the 10 resolutions reached by the body at the end of its emergency virtual meeting on Tuesday in respect of the arrest and alleged assault of Professor Ekpe by the commission.

Recall that EFCC operatives, on the grounds of authenticating a medical report presented by a suspect, were said to have invaded the hospital and subsequently arrested Prof. Ekpe under demeaning circumstances.

Advertisement

It was gathered that when the professor was accosted by the official, he told him that the office was already processing the request. However, the official allegedly went outside, mobilised other colleagues, and returned to hound the professor away after allegedly beating him and making him cry in public.

READ ALSO:EFCC Arraigns Two Over Alleged N8.9m Investment Fraud In Anambra

At a press conference held at Doctors’ Mess, Udoudoma, Uyo, on Wednesday, the NMA Chairman, Prof. Aniekan Peter, who also suffered during the crisis, said it was a slap on the integrity of the NMA as a body to allow anyone assault their member, not to talk of a professor who was only carrying out his lawful duties of saving lives and imparting knowledge.

Advertisement

Reading a communiqué endorsed by the chairman and the secretary, Dr Ighorodje Edesiri, respectively, the assistant secretary of the union expressed dismay that there has been a recurring pattern of harassment and assault of medical professionals and members of the association by security agencies within the state, adding that the union would no longer condone such acts.

The union, while observing that there was no formal invitation extended to Prof. Ekpe or the leadership of the NMA before the incident, described the act as barbaric, degrading, inhuman, and a gross violation of the sanctity of the hospital environment, thereby putting staff and patients at risk and undermining the dignity of the medical profession.

READ ALSO:EFCC Arrests Edo Traditional Ruler, One Other For Alleged fraud

Advertisement

The union, which has since embarked on an indefinite strike, said members would not return to work unless the EFCC tenders an apology to the assaulted professor, chairman, and members of the NMA, and identifies and prosecutes the officials who carried out the operation.

The union further stated that it has resolved not to offer any medical services to EFCC officials or their relatives, as they have chosen the path of cruelty against their member.

The communiqué read in part: “We observed that Prof. Eyo Ekpe was apprehended within the premises of UUTH by masked EFCC operatives who physically assaulted him, beat him to the point of bleeding, and handcuffed him alongside other doctors and hospital staff who attempted to intervene.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:EFCC Arraigns Ex-NRC MD Over Alleged $385,000, N165m Fraud

Prof. Peter, Akwa Ibom NMA chairman, was shoved and exposed to teargas when he approached the scene seeking clarification from the operatives. Hospitals are sacred environments meant for the preservation of life and should not be subjected to violent invasions by security agencies.

“We shall institute legal action against the EFCC with a demand for damages in the sum of one billion naira (N1,000,000,000) for the physical, emotional, professional, and institutional damages caused. Congress further emphasised that this action shall serve as a deterrent against future harassment, intimidation, or assault of medical practitioners by any security agency. The association reaffirmed its commitment to protecting the welfare, dignity, and safety of all its members.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending