Connect with us

News

Falana Describes Natasha’s Suspension As Legislative Recklessness

Published

on

Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, has condemned the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, describing it as the height of legislative recklessness.

In a statement issued on Sunday, Falana criticized the Nigerian Senate for violating multiple court rulings that have consistently declared legislative suspensions illegal.

He noted that despite a Federal High Court order restraining the Senate Ethics Committee from proceeding against Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Senate defied the order and went ahead with the suspension.

Advertisement

Falana demanded an immediate reversal of the suspension, warning that silencing legislators at the discretion of powerful figures in the Senate sets a dangerous precedent.

READ ALSO: Women Groups Reject Natasha’s Suspension, Threaten Protest

“The suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is the height of legislative recklessness. The illegal suspension should be lifted without any further delay,” he stated.

Advertisement

To support his argument, Falana outlined a series of past legal battles where Nigerian courts nullified unlawful legislative suspensions.

Dino Melaye & 10 Others (2010): The Federal High Court ruled the suspension illegal and ordered payment of withheld salaries.

Rifkatu Danna (2012 & 2017): Her suspension by the Bauchi State House of Assembly was overturned by both the State High Court and Court of Appeal.

Advertisement

Abdulmumin Jibrin (2018): Suspended for 180 days for exposing budget padding but later reinstated by the Federal High Court.

Ali Ndume (2017): The court ruled his suspension unlawful and unconstitutional.

READ ALSO: Natasha Breaks Silence On Her Suspension By Senate

Advertisement

Ovie Omo-Agege (2020): His suspension was annulled by the Federal High Court.

Abdul Ningi (March 2024): Suspended for alleging budget padding, but later recalled after legal intervention.

Falana insisted that the Senate’s decision to suspend Akpoti-Uduaghan despite a court order was a violation of the rule of law.

Advertisement

Since the Federal High Court had restrained the Senate Ethics Committee from hearing the complaint against the embattled Senator, the Senate ought to have stayed action in accordance with the rule of law,” he emphasized.

The human rights lawyer concluded by calling for an end to arbitrary suspensions, urging lawmakers to respect legal precedents and protect democratic principles in Nigeria.

Advertisement

News

BREAKING: ‎Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu To Life Imprisonment For Terrorism

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has been sentenced to life imprisonment by a Federal High Court in Abuja after being convicted on all seven counts of terrorism filed against him.

Justice James Omotosho, delivering judgment in Kanu’s trial, described him as a terrorist whose actions have led to bloodshed and destabilization in the South-East.

He said Kanu, who portrayed himself as a defender of his people, has instead endangered lives and national security.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:JUST IN: Nigerian Govt Demands Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

The court finds that the defendant, Nnamdi Kanu, is an international terrorist and must be treated accordingly,” Justice Omotosho declared.

The judge emphasized that the prosecution presented credible and sufficient evidence to prove the case against Kanu. He also noted that Kanu failed to enter a defense, choosing instead to rest his case on the prosecution’s evidence.

Advertisement

Justice Omotosho is still delivering the remaining part of the judgment.

 

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Nigerian Govt Demands Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

The Nigerian government has demanded the imposition of death sentence on Nnamdi Kanu following his conviction on terrorism charges.

Counsel to the Federal Government, Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, informed the court that the sections of the law under which Kanu was charged and convicted carried death sentence without any option.

Addressing the court after the pronouncement, the senior lawyer said the court has no discretion to exercise than to impose maximum punishment on him in line with the dictates of the law.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:BREAKING: Judge Orders Kanu Out Of Court Over ‘Unruly’ Conduct

Awomolo held that Kanu throughout the trial did not show remorse for the offences he committed against the Federal Republic of Nigeria but chose to be militant, arrogant and unruly in his attitude.

He also demanded that all properties seized from Kanu be forfeited to the Federal Government.

Advertisement

The prosecution counsel equally demanded that Kanu be taken to prison where his security will be guaranteed till when the judgment against him would be executed.

Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Nigerian Separatist Leader Convicted On Terrorism Charges

Published

on

A court in Nigeria has found separatist leader Nnamdi Kanu guilty of terrorism 10 years after he was first arrested.

The court said it was satisfied that Kanu had made a series of broadcasts to incite violence and killings, as part of his campaign for a separate state in south-east Nigeria, known as Biafra.

Kanu has so far been convicted on six of the seven charges he faced, with the judge continuing to deliver his ruling.

Advertisement

A relatively obscure figure, Kanu’s popularity surged in 2009 when he started Radio Biafra, a station that called for an independent state for the Igbo people broadcast to Nigeria from London.

READ ALSO:JUST IN: Court Rules Judgment In Kanu’s Terrorism Trial

Though he grew up in south-eastern Nigeria, where he attended the University of Nsukka, Kanu moved to the UK before graduating and acquired British nationality.

Advertisement

In 2014, he set up the Indigenous People Of Biafra (Ipob), a movement demanding independence.

Ipob was banned as a terrorist organisation in 2017. Its armed wing – the Eastern Security Network – has been accused of killings and other acts of violence in recent years.

Delivering his judgement, Judge James Omotosho said: “Mr Kanu knew what he was doing, he was bent on carrying out these threats without consideration to his own people.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:BREAKING: Judge Orders Kanu Out Of Court Over ‘Unruly’ Conduct

“From the incontroverted evidence, it is clear that the defendant carried out preparatory act of terrorism.

“He had the duty to explain himself but failed to do so.”

Advertisement

Ahead of the verdict, Kanu insisted that proceedings could not continue because he had not yet filed his final written address, accusing the judge of bias and not understanding the law.

READ ALSO:Court Threatens To Foreclose Kanu If He Fails To Open Defence

The verdict was delivered after Kanu had been forcibly removed from the courtroom for unruly behaviour.

Advertisement

He was first arrested in October 2015 but he jumped bail in 2017 and left the country after a military raid on his home. The court later revoked his bail in March 2019 and he was re-arrested in 2021 in Kenya.

The calls for Biafran independence date back many years.

In 1967 Igbo leaders declared a Biafran state, but after a brutal civil war, which led to the deaths of up to a million people, the secessionist rebellion was defeated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending