News

Foreign Students: UK Varsities May Fall Into Deficit, Says Report

Published

1 year ago

January 12, 2024

Editor

Many universities in the United Kingdom are at risk of falling into financial deficit due to the astronomical decline in international students after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s ban on bringing dependants into the country.

The PUNCH reports that the Home Office of the United Kingdom announced that it had commenced the implementation of its policy banning Nigerian students and other overseas students from bringing in dependants via the study visa route.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), the Home Office reiterated that only those on postgraduate research or government-sponsored scholarship students will be exempted from the development.

“We are fully committed to seeing a decisive cut in migration. From today, new overseas students will no longer be able to bring family members to the UK. Postgraduate research or government-funded scholarships students will be exempt,” the Home Office said.

Meanwhile, Financial Times on Friday reported the chief executive of Universities UK, Vivienne Stern, who represents more than 140 universities, said the sector was facing the prospect of a “serious overcorrection” thanks to immigration policies that deterred international students from coming to study in Britain.

“If they want to cool things down, that’s one thing, but it seems to me that through a combination of rhetoric, which is off-putting, and policy changes . . .[they have] really turned a whole bunch of people off that would otherwise have come to the UK,” Stern told the Financial Times.

Stern’s plea came as it emerged that some top universities, including York, which is a member of the elite Russell Group, were being forced to soften their entry requirements in order to maintain numbers of overseas students.

“The government needs to be very careful: we could end up with, from a policy point of view, what I would consider a serious overcorrection,” she added.

With the £9,250 domestic tuition fee effectively frozen for the past decade, UK universities have increasingly relied on non-EU students to make ends meet, with fees from non-EU students now accounting for nearly 20 per cent of sector income.

Universities are warning privately that numbers have softened sharply this year following a series of hostile policy moves by the government, with indications that enrolments may have fallen by more than a third from key countries, including Nigeria and India.

One senior university insider told the FT that the sector as a whole had been “spooked” by data that showed the number of international students taking up places in January 2024 was “way below the bottom end of projections for everyone”.

In January, Sunak highlighted changes in government policy to stop international graduate students from bringing family members to the UK, adding the policy was “delivering for the British people.”

The government also announced in December that it was reviewing the so-called “graduate route” enabling international students to work in the UK for two years after they graduate and announced a crackdown on “low-value courses”, even though only 3 per cent are failing to meet criteria set out by the regulator.

Data from Enroly, a web platform used by one in three international students for managing university enrollment, showed that deposit payments were down 37 per cent compared to last year.

A new analysis for UK by consultants PwC found that the combination of falling international student numbers, frozen tuition fees, rising staff wage bills, and a softening in UK student numbers was leaving the sector facing a perfect storm.

“You take those things together, and you’ve got a big problem,” Stern said, warning that the government needed to wake up to the risk posed to a sector that contributes £71bn to the UK economy every year.

The PwC analysis was based on 2021-22 financial returns for 70 UUK members in England and Northern Ireland and found that about 40 per cent are expected to be in deficit in 2023-24, falling to 19 per cent by 2025-26.

However, Paul Kett, a former senior Department for Education official who now advises PwC on education, said the numbers reflected assumptions about spending and income growth that now looked highly optimistic given the policy environment.

The PwC analysis found that if the growth in international students stagnated in the 2024-25 academic year, the proportion of universities in the financial deficit would rise from 19 per cent to 27 per cent — but if numbers started to fall between 13 and 18 per cent then four-fifths would be in deficit.

On the other side of the ledger, it found that increasing fees by 10 per cent for UK undergraduates in 2024-25 would shrink the share of universities in deficit from 19 per cent to 7 per cent.

The report said the effects of declining international enrolments could be compounded by other negative shocks, such as a rise in spending growth or a fall in domestic student numbers. It warned that mounting financial pressure could force universities to cut provision and delay investment, compromising quality for students.

Stern argued three interventions were necessary to put the sector on a stable footing: uprating tuition fees in line with inflation, increasing government teaching grants and stabilising the international market by dialling down negative rhetoric and ending question marks over the graduate route.

“You can take these individual scenarios that PwC looked at, and think that any one of them could tip a large number of institutions into a very difficult position, but the problem is that lots of those things are happening at once,” she said.

Robert Halfon, higher education minister, said: “We are fully focused on striking the right balance between acting decisively to tackle net migration, which we are clear is far too high, and attracting the brightest students to study at our universities,” he added.

News

Why Bauchi’s Future Rests with Speaker Abubakar Suleiman

Published

1 hour ago

June 19, 2025

Editor

By Isa Danbala

As the political landscape in Bauchi State begins to realign ahead of the 2027 governorship race, one name is commanding growing support across party lines, youth groups, and civil society is that of Rt. Hon. Dr. Abubakar Y. Suleiman, the seasoned Speaker of the Bauchi State House of Assembly.

With increasing calls for him to declare his ambition, it is becoming evident that Suleiman represents the most credible, tested, and people-focused option to take over from Governor Bala Mohammed and lead Bauchi into a new era of inclusive development and political stability.

On June 18, 2025, the Bauchi State Coalition of Youth and Civil Society Groups, under the Dangaladiman Ningi Vanguard, formally urged Speaker Suleiman to step forward and contest the 2027 gubernatorial elections. Their message, delivered at a press conference in Bauchi, was clear and resonant: “This is not just a political endorsement,” they said, “it is a call to service.” And few public servants in Bauchi today better exemplify a life of service, humility, and performance than Abubakar Suleiman.

Suleiman’s credentials speak for themselves. A lawmaker with a deep understanding of governance, he has served three consecutive terms as Speaker an unprecedented achievement in Bauchi’s legislative history.

Under his leadership, the Assembly has emerged as a model of efficiency, discipline, and people-centered lawmaking. While others campaign with promises, Suleiman has a portfolio filled with results bills passed, institutions strengthened, and lives impacted. He has proved that leadership is not about noise but about steady, measurable progress.

Beyond the Assembly floor, Suleiman’s human development initiatives are widely acknowledged. In many rural communities, his presence is felt through classroom construction, educational materials for school children, medical outreach programs, food relief efforts, and vocational training for youths.

These interventions have not only improved lives but shown the Speaker’s grasp of what governance means at the grassroots level. He is not just a politician he is a servant leader who understands the needs of the people and responds to them directly.

Another compelling reason why Suleiman is best positioned as the ideal successor to Governor Bala Mohammed is his unwavering loyalty and capacity for cooperation. As Speaker, he has built and sustained a productive relationship with the executive arm of government, ensuring that the state’s development agenda proceeds without needless friction.

His ability to mediate, harmonize and prioritize the public good over personal ambition has earned him wide respect, both within his party and across the broader political spectrum. This loyalty has never been about personal gain—it has been about continuity, stability, and ensuring that the wheels of progress keep turning.

In contrast, many of the other aspirants lining up for the 2027 race are either disconnected from the realities on the ground or lack the political temperament to sustain harmony in governance.

While some may have impressive federal titles, they lack Suleiman’s deep local roots and first-hand understanding of the challenges facing Bauchi communities. Others have spent more time in Abuja than in Bauchi, speaking more to elite concerns than to the daily struggles of farmers, artisans, and students. Speaker Suleiman, on the other hand, has never left the side of his people.

Even within the APC, a party blessed with high-profile aspirants like Dr. Ali Pate, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, Air Marshal Sadiq Abubakar, and Senator Shehu Buba, Suleiman’s profile is not just competitive it is superior in many key areas. He brings to the table not only legislative experience but also political tact, grassroots acceptability, and a proven ability to unite divergent interests. He does not divide—he builds bridges. And in a state as politically dynamic as Bauchi, that quality is indispensable.

The same can’t be said of the PDP field, where names like Senator Abdul Ningi, the current Commissioner of Finance, and other technocrats have been mentioned. While many of them have solid records, none possess Suleiman’s unique combination of experience, humility, and direct impact. None have his unmatched tenure as Speaker, or his widespread support among the youth and civil society.

Moreover, Suleiman’s political strength lies not just in the number of supporters he has but in the nature of that support. The call for him to contest is coming not from political jobbers or godfathers, but from ordinary people: community leaders, young professionals, market women, and non-governmental actors who see in him a leader they can trust. They believe that the same man who stood with them in quiet seasons of need can be trusted to govern them with fairness, vision, and courage.

The argument about zoning is another issue that Suleiman’s candidacy intelligently addresses. Coming from Ningi in Bauchi Central, he stands in a strategic position to bridge the recurring agitation between Bauchi North and Bauchi South. He is acceptable across the zones and has no history of divisive politics. In a state where unity is the foundation for progress, Suleiman is that neutral voice that all sides can rally around.

As 2027 approaches, the decision before the people of Bauchi is not merely about electing a new governor it is about choosing the direction of the state’s future. Will Bauchi continue on the path of meaningful development, stability, and inclusive governance, or will it retreat into the uncertainties of experimental leadership? With Speaker Abubakar Suleiman, the path is clear. His experience is deep, his temperament calm, his record solid, and his compassion genuine.

The call has been made. The people are ready. The moment is now. All that remains is for the man himself Rt. Hon. Dr. Abubakar Y. Suleiman to answer the call.

If he does, Bauchi may be set for a smooth, impactful, and people-focused transition that will deepen development and restore confidence in leadership. And history, as always, will remember those who stood up when the people called.

Isa Danbala, write from Abuja

News

Ghanaians Protest, Decry ‘State-sponsored’ Harassment In Abuja

Published

3 hours ago

June 19, 2025

Editor

Hundreds of Ghanaian investors and community members on Wednesday besieged the Nigerian High Commission in Abuja, demanding redress over what they described as “systematic harassment, intimidation, and violation of our fundamental rights” by the Nigeria Police and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

“Our businesses are being hounded at every turn,” one of the lead developers of the River Park Estate project in Abuja, Kojo Mensah, said.

The investors claimed that their fundamental rights were being violated, alleging arbitrary arrests, repeated police invitations, and intimidation by both the police and the EFCC.

“We’ve been arrested arbitrarily, summoned without cause, and subjected to endless interrogations, yet the very complaints we cooperated to resolve back in 2012 remain buried in some dusty file,” he said.

Carrying banners that read, “Hands Off Ghanaian Investors!” and “Tinubu, Mahama: Intervene Now!”, the demonstrators called for the immediate removal of Inspector General of Police, Mr Kayode Egbetokun, whom they accused of targeted attacks on Ghanaian businesses operating in Nigeria.

“We demand that President Bola Tinubu and President John Mahama use every diplomatic channel to stop this injustice,” the investors said.

The protest follows the filing of a suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja, in which Jonah Capital and its co-plaintiffs named IGP Egbetokun, the Nigeria Police, and the EFCC as defendants.

They are seeking a perpetual injunction restraining both agencies “from any further interference in the River Park Estate matter,” immediate disclosure of the long-delayed Special Investigation Panel report, and the sum of N200m in damages for alleged breaches of their constitutional rights.

The suit, according to the plaintiffs, is not only to seek redress but also to safeguard the integrity of foreign investments in Nigeria and discourage what they describe as state-sponsored intimidation of legitimate investors.

In their amended writ, the plaintiffs alleged that although the SIP concluded its probe and reported to the IG, those findings had never been furnished to the investors despite repeated formal requests.

“Instead,” the suit contends, “a senior officer in the IG’s Monitoring Unit has unilaterally reopened the investigation, purportedly to undermine the SIP’s clear exoneration of our companies.”

News

Pastor Enenche Rejects N30m Donation From Kebbi Governor

Published

3 hours ago

June 19, 2025

Editor

The Senior Pastor of Dunamis International Gospel Centre, Dr Paul Enenche, has rejected a N30 million donation offered by the Kebbi State Governor, Nasir Idris, during a crusade organised by the church in the state.

The gesture occurred at the Kebbi Healing and Deliverance Crusade, where a representative of the governor, Kebbi’s Commissioner for Social Duties, Zayyanu Umar Aliero, announced the cash gift on behalf of the governor.

Aliero told the gathering that the N30m was approved as a donation to the crusade’s organising committee and was available in cash.

Aliero said, “Our Governor, His Excellency Dr Nasir Idris, a faithful Governor and also a Comrade Governor, who you all know is the only Comrade Governor in this country. He has therefore graciously approved the donation of the sum of 30 million naira to this gathering.

“That is to the organising committee. His Excellency has approved the donation of a sum of 30 million naira to the organising committee, which you know that whenever His Excellency makes a donation, he doesn’t leave without bringing that donation in cash. So before I leave this stage, I want to present that sum of 30 million naira in cash.”

However, Enenche declined the offer, taking to the stage to urge that the money be redirected to charitable causes.

“If there is anything like orphanage, if there is anything like that, at your discretion, please apply this amount of money to it. No. It will not be received,” the senior pastor said.

Speaking later, Enenche explained the church’s stance, emphasising that public funds should be used solely for public causes.

“We are one of those who believe that government money should be used for government projects and government things should be used for government things; and church money should be used for church things, not mixed together.

“That is what we did that is what we do. As small as the Glory Dome is right there, government money is not in it. From land to the building to everything,” he said.

He added that the body of Christ should “trust God for supernatural supplies.”

He suggested that the donation be handed over to a government-approved religious body instead, such as the Christian Pilgrims Welfare Board or the Christian Association of Nigeria.

“This is so that we can retain our dignity as a body of Christ; retain our dignity as a church, and say what we need to say when we need to say it. And be able to say what we need to say when we need to say it,” he said.

Aliero, speaking after the rejection, acknowledged Enenche’s position.

“They don’t accept it because whatever he is doing, he is doing it for the sake of God. We really appreciate and we really thank him for what he is doing in our state,” he said.