News

How I Used ICPC, EFCC To Secure Debt Relief For Nigeria – Obasanjo

Published

2 years ago

October 25, 2024

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has outlined the steps he took to secure substantial debt relief for Nigeria during his tenure from 1999 to 2007.

He noted that the creation of the Independent Corrupt Practices & Other Related Offences Commission, ICPC, and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, were part of his policy moves that convinced Nigeria’s creditors to write off debts.

Obasanjo highlighted the challenges he faced upon assuming office, including Nigeria’s debt servicing burden of $3.5 billion annually and a total debt of approximately $36 billion, while the nation’s reserves stood at a modest $3.7 billion.

Obasanjo revealed that he successfully negotiated debt forgiveness by convincing international lenders of his administration’s commitment to channeling the funds saved into developmental projects aimed at sustainable growth.

He emphasised that presenting a credible and transparent plan was key, as global financial institutions required assurances that forgiven debt would foster positive development outcomes.

Reflecting on the current state of leadership in Nigeria, Obasanjo expressed concerns about a perceived decline in ethical leadership and effective planning.

He stressed that without a genuine development-oriented approach, requests for debt forgiveness are unlikely to gain international approval.

“When I became elected President of Nigeria, one of the things that worried me and that I wanted to do something about was debt relief. The quantum of debt that we were carrying, the burden was too heavy. We were spending $3.5bn to service debt, yet the quantum was not going down and I believed that we should seek debt relief.

“Many people inside and outside Nigeria thought it was a bad dream but I was convinced. I went to the World Bank and I started talking to our creditors,” Obasanjo said.

He explained that in his moves he found why the world lenders “did not feel that they owe us”, disclosing that they give consideration “when you make your case if they find that you are genuinely showing and trying to carry out what they call reforms, and the reforms they are asking us to carry out are reforms we should ordinarily carry out.

“How do you have public service delivered, how do you drastically reduce corruption, how do you manage your finances? And all these are reforms that nobody needs to tell us to do.”

Obasanjo noted that international lenders are more willing to engage with nations demonstrating accountability, stating, “when the world lenders believe that you’re doing what they expect of you, they will listen and you may even find the world more sympathetic than you thought. The world does not feel it owes you anything but if you show responsibility.”

He said, “I took over and I found they were using over $3.5b to service debt, that’s a lot of money but the problem was that the quantum of debt was not going down because that amount of money was being spent together to pay interests and to pay what they call penalties, because (for) any default you pay penalties and you can’t show good course for the debt.”

Illustrating the misuse of loans, he referenced a state project where a loan intended for carpet production was fully spent without any work being done on-site. He was told, “a small print which says once you sign, how the money is spent is not the responsibility of the lender, it’s the responsibility of the borrower.”

“With all these, I was convinced that I could make a credible case, a serious case, and then of course on the other hand they wanted me to do what’s right that I should not continue with the irresponsibility of the past, the corruption of the past.

“The point is that the international community know us more than we know ourselves and at times we bow our heads like ostrich in the sand. They know what you do,” he said.

The former president said the creation of the Independent Corrupt Practices & Other Related Offences Commission and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission was borne out of the move to satisfy the course to secure debt forgiveness, as part of reforms to prove readiness to eliminate the stench of corruption and mismanagement.

“Of course, if you remember one of the first bills that I sent to the National Assembly was the ICPC bill to fight corruption. I followed that up later with the EFCC bill, again to fight corruption because the international community knows what you’re doing.

“So, convinced of the fact that we could not sustain the amount of money we were spending to service debt with the quantum of debt not going down, anytime we defaulted they gave us heavy penalties, and my determination to do what would convince Nigerians internally and convince our development partners/creditors, then it took almost six years before we got there and at the end of the day, they were satisfied.

“I even gave them assurance that the money saved from our debt relief would be spent on the sustainable development goals and that was been done.

“The world out there doesn’t feel that it owes you anything but if you do what is right, there’s a lot you can get out of the world,” the former president explained.

Obasanjo who lamented a situation “where leaders rather than manage the economy and prosperity of the nation for all, they manage it for themselves,” said, “Where there is no development you are actually inviting problems.”

He explained “When I came in 1999, I met $3.7bn in the reserves, and as I have told you, we were spending $3.5bn to service debt. That’s all we have. When I came in we had debt overhand of close to $36bn, by the time we left eight years later, with the debt relief and clearing what we had to clear, the quantum of debt I left was about $3.5/3.6bn from over about $36bn dollars.

“At the same time, the reserves that was $3.7bn went to $45bn, at the same time we had what we call the excess crude, the amount in excess between what we budgeted at which we seek to sell crude oil and we actually sold it.

“Normally, we were conservative in budgeting, we had about $25bn (in the excess crude account). When you add that to the reserves, we are talking about $70bn dollars.”

He however lamented, “The point is that I left in 2007, between 2007 and 2024 all that amount of money had gone. Not only that, all that money they made during that period had gone and today we own more than we owed when I came to government in 1999. Why? Poor leadership, poor management of economy, corruption galore, pervasive corruption.”

Expressing his disappointment in successive administrations, Obasanjo decried “the deficit of leadership” that has hindered the nation’s progress, adding, “I feel bad.”

“As I always say, leadership is not a thing that you pick on the road, and not everybody is given to it. When we identify leadership we should appreciate it and use it to good advantage…

“The point in Nigeria particularly is that we take two steps forward, we take one sideways and take two or three backward, that can’t get us far.

“Leadership is something we should pay attention to. What do you say of a Nigerian president who came to office without a plan? And then he woke up and just said three-point plans. What are the plans, what are they going to achieve, and who are the people who have worked on it? You came and just opened your mouth and make a pronouncement on something that has not been studied,” Obasanjo said.
VANGUARD

Related Topics:#Nigeria #Obasanjo EFCC ICPC

Up Next

10 Things To Know About Madam Efunroye Tinubu, The Powerful Slave Trader And Kingmaker

Don't Miss

‘Felt Like World Was Against Me’ – Jonathan Recounts Losing 2015 Polls As Incumbent

Comments

News

Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Tells FG To Retaliate Against South African Companies In Nigeria

Published

7 hours ago

May 5, 2026

Editor

Senator Adams Oshiomhole has called on the Federal Government to retaliate against South African businesses operating in Nigeria following the recent attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

Speaking during plenary on Tuesday, Oshiomhole said the Federal Government should consider revoking the working license of South African owned companies such as MTN and DSTV.

He argued that Nigeria must respond firmly to what he described as persistent hostility against its citizens.

“I am not going to shed tears. If you hit me, I hit you. I think it is appropriate in diplomacy. It is an economic struggle,” Oshiomhole said.

He argued that while some South Africans accuse Nigerians of taking their jobs, Nigerians should return home and take over employment opportunities created by major South African companies operating in the country, including MTN and DSTV.

“When we hit back, the President of South Africa will not only talk but will also go on his knees to recognise that Nigeria cannot be intimidated.

“We will not condone any life being lost. If a crime has been committed under the South African law they have the right to bring any such person to justice, but to kill our people as if we are helpless, we will not allow that,” Oshiomhole added.

DAILY POST reports that several Nigerians in South Africa have reportedly been attacked, and their businesses destroyed, in ongoing xenophobic attacks in the country.

News

IGP Orders Officers Display Name Tag On Uniform, Gives Update On State Police

Published

7 hours ago

May 5, 2026

Editor

The Inspector General of Police, IGP, Tunji Disu, has ordered all police personnel to always have their name tags on their uniforms for easy identification.

Disu disclosed that only police personnel who are undercover are exempted from displaying their name tags.

Speaking on Tuesday, Disu said: “All police officers should have their name tags. All of us on the high table have our names apart from the undercover among us so if you look at all the Commissioners of Police we have our name tags, so it’s not our standard.

News

Court Orders SERAP To Pay DSS Operatives N100m For Defamation

Published

12 hours ago

May 5, 2026

Editor

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has ordered a non-governmental organization, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, to pay N100 million as damaged to two operatives of the Department of the State Services, DSS, for unjustly defaming them in some publications.

The court also ordered SERAP to tender public apologies to the defamed officers,
Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, in two national newspapers, two television stations and its website.

Besides, the organization was also ordered to pay the two operatives N1 million as cost of litigation and 10 percent post-judgment interest annually on the judgment sum until it’s fully liquidated.

Justice Yusuf Halilu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory gave the order on Tuesday while delivering judgment in a N5.5 billion defamation suit instituted against SERAP by the DSS operatives.

The judge found SERAP liable for unjustly defaming the two DSS operatives with allegations that they unlawfully invaded its Abuja office, harassed and intimidated its staff, in September 2024.

In the offending publication on its website and Twitter handle, SERAP alleged that the two operatives unlawfully invaded and occupied its office with sinister motives.

The judge held that the publication was in bad taste especially from an organization established to promote transparency and accountability, as nothing in the publication was found to be truthful.

The DSS staff had listed SERAP as 1st defendant in the suit marked CV/4547/2024. SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, was listed as the 2nd defendant.

In the suit, the claimants – Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele – accused the two defendants of making false claims that they invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024..

Counsel to the DSS, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, had while adopting his final address in the mater urged the judge to grant all the reliefs sought by his client in the interest of justice.

He admitted that although the names of the two claimants were not mentioned in the defamation materials, they had however established substantial circumstances that they are the ones referred to in the published defamation article by SERAP on its website.

The counsel submitted that all ingredients of defamation have been clearly established and the offending publication referred to the two officials of the secret police.

However, SERAP, through its counsel, Victoria Bassey from Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, law firm, asked the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the two claimants did not establish that they were the ones referred to in the alleged defamation materials.

She said that SERAP used “DSS officials” in the alleged offending publication, adding that the two claimants must establish that they are the ones referred to before their case can succeed.

Similar arguments were canvassed by Oluwatosin Adefioye who stood for the second defendant, adding that there was no dispute in the September 9, 2024 operation of DSS in SERAP’s office.

He said that since SERAP in the publication did not name any particular person, the claimants must plead special circumstances that they were the ones referred to as the DSS officials.

Besides, he said that there is no organization by name Department of State Services in law, hence, DSS cannot claim being defamed adding that the only entity known to law is National Security Agency.

The claimants had in the suit stated that the alleged false claim by SERAP has negatively impacted on their reputation.

The DSS also stated, in the statement of claim, that, in line with the agency’s practice of engaging with officials of non-governmental organisations operating in the FCT to establish a relationship with their new leadership, it directed the two officials – John and Ogunleye – to visit SERAP’s office and invite them for a familiarization meeting.

The claimants added that in carrying out the directive, John and Ogunleye paid a friendly visit to SERAP’s office at 18 Bamako Street, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja on September 9 and met with one Ruth, who upon being informed about the purpose of the visit, claimed that none of SERAP’s management staff was in the country and advised that a formal letter of invitation be written by the DSS.

John and Ogundele, who claimed that their interactions with Ruth were recorded, said before they immediately exited SERAP’s office, Ruth promised to inform her organisation’s management about the visit and volunteered a phone number – 08160537202.

They said it was surprising that, shortly after their visit, SERAP posted on its X (Twitter) handle – @SERAPNigeria – that officers of the DSS are presently unlawfully occupying its office.

The claimant added, “On the same day, the defendants also published a statement on SERAP’s website, which was widely reported by several media outfits, falsely alleging that some officers from the DSS, described as “a tall, large, dark-skinned woman” and “a slim, dark skinned man,” invaded their Abuja office and interrogated the staff of the first defendant (SERAP).

John and Ogundele stated that “due to the false statements published by the defendants, the DSS has been ridiculed and criticised by international agencies such as the Amnesty International and prominent members of the Nigerian society, such as Femi Falana (SAN)”.

“Due to the false statements published by the defendants, members of the public and the international community formed the opinion that the Federal Government is using the DSS to harass the defendants.”

They added that the defendants’ statements caused harm to their reputation because the staff and management of the DSS have formed the opinion that the claimants did not follow orders and carried out an unsanctioned operation and are therefore, incompetent and unprofessional.

The claimants therefore prayed the court for the following reliefs: “An order directing the defendants to tender an apology to the claimants via the first defendant’s (SERAP’s) website, X (twitter) handle, two national daily newspapers (Punch and Vanguard) and two national news television stations (Arise Television and Channels Television) for falsely accusing the claimants of unlawfully invading the first defendant’s office and interrogating the first defendant’s staff.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N5 billion as damages for the libellous statements published about the claimants.

“Interest on the sum of N5b at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the date of judgment until the judgment sum is realised or liquidated.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N50 million as costs of this action.”