Connect with us

Politics

INEC, NNPP Sued for Substituting Name Of Bauchi House Of Reps Candidate

Published

on

The winner of the Bauchi State House of Representatives Primary election under the platform of the

The New Nigeria Peoples Party, ( NNPP), senate candidate for Bauchi State, Kabiru Mohammed has dragged the party and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) before a Federal High Court for allegedly refusing to publish his name for the 2023 general election after winning the party’s primary.

Advertisement

The case was filed at the Federal High Court, Bauchi and was first mentioned for hearing on Monday, September 26, 2022.

The contention is over who is the rightful candidate of the NNPP to contest in the 2023 general elections to represent Katagum Federal constituency in the House of Representatives.

Kabiru Mohammed is seeking an injunction prohibiting the 3rd defendant, Ibrahim Mohammed Babas from parading himself as the candidate of the NNPP for Katagum Federal constituency for the House of Representatives in the 2023 elections.

Advertisement

Kabiru contested the primary election of the party but lost to Ibrahim Mohammed Babas who did not participate in the party’s primary due to his participation in the Bauchi North Senatorial contest under the platform of the All Progressives Congress APC.

Kabiru who contested the primary election and won, went to court to challenge the attempt by the party to steal his mandate after INEC recognized Ibrahim Mohammed Babas as the candidate for the Katagum Federal House of Representatives in the state.

READ ALSO: Tinubu’s ’Emilokan’ Ambition Not Good For Democracy – Utomi

Advertisement

Shortly after the case was mentioned for hearing at the Federal High court in Bauchi, Kabiru Mohammed said Ibrahim Mohammed Babas decamped to NNPP when he lost the senatorial primary election under the platform of APC.

“My party submitted his name to INEC as the candidate for Katagum Federal House of Representatives but I will not leave any stone unturned in my quest to reclaim my mandate. I resolved not to withdraw from the race for any reason because the mandate was duly given to me by the members of my party”

“I am the elected candidate for the party and I will not withdraw for anybody because, by right, the mandate was given to me by members of our great party. The delegates so conspired and removed my name, I consider this as undemocratic, illegal and of course inhuman. This is the reason why I challenged their action in court,” he said

Advertisement

When the case was earlier mentioned in the Bauchi Federal High court, the Counsel to the petitioner Hassan ElYakub, Senior Advocate of Nigeria( SAN) explained that there was an issue of representation as two counsels appeared for the second defendant.

However, a different motion was filed by the second defendant, saying that they want to withdraw one of the suits but Counsel to the defendants, Habila Barau said they were briefed by the second defendant to take over the case from the Counsel that earlier filed the case.

Counsel to the plaintiff ElYaqub disagreed with their submission after a long argument

Advertisement

In his submission, the presiding judge Justice BO Quadri adjourned the matter to Thursday 29th September 2022, to enable them sort out the issues of representation.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Comments

Politics

Tribunal: INEC Presents Blurry Adeleke’s Testimonial, Oyetola Kicks

Published

on

By

The Election Petition Tribunal hearing case emanating from the July 16 governorship election in Osun State was forced into adjournment on Thursday following presentation of blurry documents used by the Governor Ademola Adeleke for 2018 elections.

The eight-page documents presented by a Deputy Director of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Joan Arabs, included Certified True Copies of the testimonial obtained by Adeleke from Ede Muslim Grammar School, and West Africa Examination Council General Certificate of Education.

Advertisement

The panel had last week Friday ruled that INEC chairman should bring Adeleke’s filings for 2018 poll on its next sitting.

READ ALSO: Adeleke Directs LG Heads To Replace Sacked Chairmen

At the day’s proceedings, after checking the documents presented by INEC, counsel to the petitioners, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, who appeared with Akin Olujinmi, SAN, told the panel that two out of the pages were not clear enough.

Advertisement

Fagbemi said section for scores obtained by the candidate on the GCE result was blank, adding that the address of the school that awarded the testimonial was not also clear enough.

But counsel to INEC, Prof. Paul Ananaba, SAN, said the copies were clear and readable, urging the plaintiffs to allow the documents to be admitted, since they had earlier claimed that they had CTC copies of the documents which could be presented.

He assured not to object to the documents if presented by the plantiffs.

Advertisement

Counsel to Adeleke and Peoples Democratic Party, Onyeachi Ikpeazu, SAN and Dr. Alex Izinyon, SAN, respectively said the documents were clear enough, but admitted some sections were blurry.

They, however, said the documents were still rectifiable and urged the petitioners to call their next witness, while INEC should be made to present a clearer copies, if they have.

Ananaba later called for stand down of the matter to enable him obtain screenshots of the documents from the INEC headquarters in Abuja.

Advertisement

After the panel had reconvened, Ananaba presented both colour and back and white copies made from the screenshots obtained from INEC head office, which he also admitted were not better than the copies earlier presented.

He sought adjournment to enable INEC brought before the panel, the file from which the copies earlier presented were made from.

READ ALSO: JUST IN: Supreme Court Affirms Osun Gov-elect, Adeleke As PDP Candidate

Advertisement

Fagbemi, however, insisted that the order of the court was that clear documents should be presented, saying the respondents must comply with the directive.

Reading the ruling of the panel, the Tribunal Chairman, Justice Tertse Kume, adjourned the matter till Saturday for the INEC to bring the original file containing the documents.
PUNCH

 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

JUST IN: Labour Party Expels Peter Obi’s DG, Okupe, 10 Others

Published

on

By

The Labour Party in Ogun State has expelled the Director-General of the Peter Obi Presidential Campaign Council, Doyin Okupe.

Okupe was sacked alongside 10 others for alleged non-financial membership status, high-handedness and financial recklessness.

Advertisement

The Chairman of the party in Ogun State, Michael Ashade, announced the party’s decision in Abeokuta Thursday, saying the offences were a breach of the Labour Party’s constitution.

Ashade said Okupe has ceased to be a LP member for his “failure to meet the mandatory constitutional requirements to fulfill membership status.”

According to him, Okupe had failed to pay his membership dues since the last six months he joined the Party, saying he has therefore forfeited his membership of the Labour Party and he is no longer fit to act as the Director General of Obi’s campaign council.

Advertisement

He stated that the offenses of Okupe amd and the other 10 are against Article 9(3) sub(iii) and Article 9(3)xi of the LP constitution.

READ ALSO: Akwa Ibom YPP Guber Candidate Bags 42 Years In Prison Over Corruption

He accused Okupe of mismanaging the funds approved for the LP in Ogun to mobilize members for the rally held last week at Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

Advertisement

While notifying the LP National Chairman, Barr Julius Abure of their decision, they called on Obi to immediately appoint another DG for the PCC from the North.

Okupe could not be reached for his reactions as calls to his mobile phone were unanswered.

He also did not respond to a text message sent to him as of the time of this report.

Advertisement

Okupe is from Ikenne Local Government Area of Ogun State.

 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Court Strikes Out Fresh Suit Seeking To Sack Rivers APC Guber Candidate

Published

on

By

A Federal High Court sitting in Port Harcourt, on Wednesday, stuck out a suit by a governorship aspirant in the All Progressives Congress, APC, Benard Mikko, over the party’s primary elections in Rivers State.

The Governorship candidate of the APC, Tonye Cole, the Independent National Electoral Commission and another governorship aspirant of the APC Ojukaye Flagg-Amachree were also joined in the suit.

Advertisement

But the court ruled that the suit was lacking in merit.

Mikko had approached the court to direct INEC to disqualify Tonye Cole from next year’s Governorship election, claiming that the primary election held on 26th of May, 2022, that brought him in as the governorship candidate was marred with irregularities.

He also claimed that the candidate has a questionable character following his indictment in a white paper report by a commission of inquiry set up by the Rivers State government.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: BREAKING: Court Sacks Tonye Cole As APC Governorship Candidate In Rivers

Presiding judge, Justice Ayua Phoebe in her judgment said the court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the suit because the plaintiff failed to exhaust all the internal mechanisms of the party before instituting the legal action, adding that the party is supreme.

The judge, while describing the suit as frivolous and abuse of court process, ruled that Mikko also failed to abide by his earlier oath of allegiance sworn to the APC never to institute any legal action against the party and that he will support whoever emerged from the primaries.

Advertisement

While the counsel to the APC, Chinda Chizim commended the judgement, that of the plaintiff, Eli Ojigba said he will consult his client for his next line of action.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending