News
NYSC: Serving Their Bandit-land [OPINION]

By Suyi Ayodele
“Mr. Ross: be not uneasy, your son, Charley Bruster, …we got him and no powers on earth can deliver out of our hand.” This was one of the letters sent to a distraught father, Christian Ross, whose son, Charley Ross, was kidnapped on July 1, 1874, in Philadelphia, United States of America, by two unknown fellas.
The felons were said to have written about 23 different letters of ransom demands to the Ross family. The kidnappers, according to the Pennsylvania Center for the Book, demanded the sum of $20,000 for the release of Charley, an amount of money the family could not afford. The father of the victim detailed the agony of the family over the kidnap of Charley in a book titled: “The Father’s Story of Charley Ross, the Kidnapped Child.”
The US security agencies did all they could to get Charley released from captivity all to no avail. The closest clue they got was the match of Charley’s ransom-demand letter with another letter written for ransom in another kidnapping case. The police were able to link the two letters to one ex-convict, William Mosher, who was killed earlier in a police shoot-out. Mosher’s accomplice, Joseph Douglas, who was arrested during the encounter, was said to have confessed to the kidnapping of Charley, but regrettably announced that only Mosher knew where he was kept.
Charley’s father, Christian, died in 1897, and the mother in 1912. His older brother, Walter Ross, who was present when Charley was kidnapped, equally passed on in 1943. To date, Charley Ross’ kidnap is one case the US has not been able to unravel. The Pennsylvania Center for the Book documented the ugly incident in the history of America as the first known victim of kidnapping for ransom in the US.
The beauty of the whole incident, however, is that as far back as 150 years ago, the US had developed a technology that allowed it to match handwriting. Yes, Charley was never discovered, his abductors were unravelled. Douglas, the accomplice, who could have been of help, unfortunately died before he could volunteer more information.
America learnt its lesson from the Chaley Ross’ case. One century and 17 years later, another kidnapping took place in California. An 11-year-old Jaycee Lee Dugard was kidnapped on her way to school on June 10, 1991. The US authorities swung into action and searches began. No positive results were achieved despite all the identity profiling supplied by witnesses. However, on August 24, 2009, 18 years after Dugard disappeared, one sex offender convict on parole, Phillip Garrido, showed up in the University of California, Berkeley, accompanied by two young girls. Eagle-eyed security personnel in the university observed something unusual about the party. Garrido was taken into custody for questioning. One thing led to the other, and the suspect invited the mother of the young girls to prove his case. The mother turned out to be Dugard, who was kidnapped 18 years ago, and the girls, her children; all products of serial rape she suffered in the hands of Garrido, who, in connivance with his wife, Nancy, kept the victim at the back of their house!
Pronto, the husband and wife were arraigned, convicted, and sentenced to 431 and 36 years imprisonment on April 28, 2011. But that was not the end of the matter. For failing to discharge its responsibilities of monitoring Garrido, who had been on parole for the rape he committed in 1976, Dugard sued the State of California. In 2010, the courts awarded the sum of $20 million to Dugard against the State of California for its contributions to the young girl’s ordeals in the hands of the felon. California paid the awarded sum of money because America runs a system that punishes infractions, negligence and inefficiency in governance. The accounts of Dugard’s kidnap are recorded in two books: “A Stolen Life” (2011), and “My Book of Firsts” (2016), written by Dugard.
MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Lest China seize our President
What America learnt over the years was put to test in 2020, when an American, Phillip Walton, aged 27, was kidnapped in Niger Republic and ferried to the Nigerian side of the border by his abductors. The US special forces came visiting the camp. In the operation that lasted less than 20 minutes, the elite US special forces “…executed a daring night-time operation to rescue their fellow American with exceptional skill, precision and bravery…”, so wrote the then US President, Donald Trump. Walton was rescued on October 31, 2020, 96 hours after he was kidnapped in Niger Republic, and 11 of his abductors were said to have “dropped dead before they knew what hit them!” The US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, said of that rescue mission thus: “The United States is committed to the safe return of all US citizens taken captive. We delivered on that commitment late last night in Nigeria….We will never abandon any American taken hostage.” That is a nation that cares!
I have dwelt on those cases above to show that crime and criminality are not natives of Nigeria. The most developed countries of the world also have their own share of the good, the bad and the ugly. However, what separates Nigeria from other sane countries of the world, is our inability to initiate a concrete system that rewards good deeds and punishes bad behaviours. We also do not learn from experience and mistakes! Take the case of the eight intending National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members who were kidnapped in Zamfara State on August 17, 2023, while on their way to Sokoto State where they were mobilised to observe the compulsory NYSC programme for one year. According to the reports, 11 of the fresh university graduates from Akwa Ibom State were in the bus enroute Sokoto State Orientation Camp when bandits waylaid them. Three of the travellers escaped while the remaining eight, alongside their driver, were shepherded into captivity.
A serious nation, which considers the safety of its citizenry as priority, would have given all to ensure that those children did not spend a day in captivity. But not Nigeria. From the lackadaisical attitude of those in authority to the flat-footed nature of the nation’s security agencies, all Nigerians got was assurance that the victims would be rescued. Anyone, who is familiar with the advancement Nigeria has made in technology, especially in the telecommunications sector, would be appalled that in the Nigeria of 2024, kidnappers could still hold victims and go ahead to make calls demanding ransom without being tracked! That is our collective shame! Unfortunately, it happens to us daily! The last victim of the vibrant eight young school leavers was released, or ‘rescued’, as the authorities would want us to believe, on Thursday, August 2, 2024. That was a clear one year and five days after the victims were kidnapped!
MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: ‘Protest’ That ‘Restructured’ Nigeriass
More nauseating was the pattern with which the first set of victims were ‘rescued’. Like birds in a poultry cage, the victims were ‘rescued’ piecemeal as detailed by the NYSC Director General, Brigadier-General Yusha’u Ahmed, who said: “On August 22, we rescued the last corps member in a set of eight, Solomon Daniel Basse. On the 30th of August 2023, we rescued the first prospective corps member, Emmanuel Esudue. Victoria Bassey Udoka was rescued on the 20th of October 2023. Abigail Peter Sandy was rescued on the 7th of December 2023. Sabbath Anyaewe Ikan was equally rescued on the 7th of December 2023. Obong Victor Udofia was rescued on the 3rd of February 2024. Daniel Bassey was rescued on the 8th of February 2024. Glory Etukudo Thomas was rescued on the 9th of June 2024.” The Army General, as usual with all our security agents, had an alibi for the scattered ‘rescue’ operations. He said that the movement of the kidnapped prospective corps members from one camp to the other by their abductors made the ‘rescue’ operation to be piecemeal!
Ahmed was not through. He intoned that “no state government brought any amount for their rescue as claimed in the media. I must state that I have not received one naira from any state government so far in the name of the rescue of these corps members. No group of people or organisations aided in the rescue of the prospective corps members apart from the security agencies, particularly the army and the DSS.” Do we clap for our agile General! No mention was made of any of the abductors “neutralised or fell to the superior firepower of the security agents, while some escaped with bullet wounds!” Pity!
Now, in recognition of their service to their Bandit-land, the ‘rescued’ eight intending corps members would be issued their discharge certificates for the completion of the one-year compulsory NYSC programme in the camps of their abductors! Wow! That is a good gesture, anyway, for it would have amounted to double jeopardy if the young boys and girls were asked to repeat the service year. However, the problems of the ‘rescued’ victims go beyond the issue of issuance of discharge certificates. While in captivity, a lot must have happened to their psyche. Would these ones ever trust the Nigerian nation again? Would they ever have confidence in the ability of the state to rise to defend them anytime the need arises? What about the agony they were subjected to, and yet, there is no cheering news that one of the felons who visited the inhuman treatment on them was apprehended? How do we build their confidence and ensure that they remain patriotic? The females among them, who can tell what they went through?
Those in charge of our communication and technology have harassed Nigerians to no end in the last two years, or more, demanding from us all sorts of data. From Bank Verification Number (BVN) to National Identification Numbers (NIN), and the compulsory registration of mobile phone numbers, Nigeria has wasted billions of naira on these projects. Yet, in the year of the Lord 2024, kidnappers still make calls to collect ransom without being detected! What happens to the data in the nation’s data bank? What about the biometric registrations Nigerians were made to undertake? Our pictures and fingerprints are domiciled in the data banks of all the service providers and banks. What do our security agents do with that information when they have cases like the kidnap of the NYSC members?
MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Ifa’s Message For Our President
The same is applicable in the case of the 20 medical students from the University of Maiduguri and the University of Jos, who were kidnapped in Otukpo area of Benue state while on their way to Enugu on August 16, 2024. The medical students were said to have been rescued, with the mastermind of the abduction “killed during rescue operation.” The Inspector General of Police (IGP), the self-acclaimed “wounded ;ion”, Kayode Egbetokun, while addressing a press conference in Abuja on Sunday, added that two other members of the gang that kidnapped the medical students were arrested during the operation, in addition to the fact that no ransom was paid.
The IGP particularly commended the officers and men of the office of the National Security Adviser (NSA), for their support in the ‘rescue’ operation. No matter our level of scepticism, because of the tendency for the tall tale by our government officials, the news by Egbetokun that the kingpin of this notorious gang was “neutralised during exchange of fire with our operatives…while two other members of the gang were arrested”, is worth ‘celebrating’. It does not just click to say that a kidnapped victim was ‘rescued’ and no arrest or killing of the kidnappers took place!
While we rejoice with the ‘rescued’ victims, their family members and the nation at large, our sympathy also goes to the family of Alhaji Isa Bawa, the Sarkin Gobir, Gatawa District, Sokoto State, who was killed by his abductors because the family could not raise the N1 billion ransom demanded. The District Head’s case becomes even more pathetic because after killing him, his abductors vowed not to release his corpse until a ransom of N60 million and six motorcycles are paid! Before he was killed, Emir Bawa spent three weeks in captivity, having been kidnapped alongside his son on July 29, 2024. The District Head’s corpse remains the most expensive dead body in the history of Nigeria!
Again, all the negotiation for ransom for release alive, and for the release of the corpse, were carried out using telephone! Nigeria once had various satellites like NigeriaSat-1, NigeriaSat-2 and NigeriaSat-X which cost the nation huge sums of money in hard currency! NigeriaSat-1, for instance, when it was launched in 2003, was said to have cost $13 million, with a capacity of monitoring disaster in orbit 700km, whatever that meant! Where is that facility in the face of the calamities befalling the nation! The nation launched the NigeriaSat-2 in 2011, which is still in orbit and is said to be providing “imagery for the country.” What do our security agents do with the “imagery”, or are they blurred?
Why do we still pay the personnel in the Nigerian Communications Satellite Limited (NIGCOMSAT) if kidnapped victims could be made to serve their fatherland in captivity? If those facilities are no longer functioning, have we asked what happened? Have we punished anyone for their failure given the huge sums of money spent to acquire them? What about our celebrated “computer guru”, Bosun Tijani, the Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy? What value has he brought to the table in the last one year to stem the spate of abductions for ransom? Is it all about banning Twitter, curtailing WhatsApp and demanding for personal data from the citizenry?
While it is true that kidnapping did not start with the present administration, the government of the day should realise that one of the points the president raised while seeking for the votes of Nigerians is the issue of insecurity. If not for anything, but to make those who invested their trust in him happy for once, the president should do something different from his immediate predecessor.
Truth be told, Nigerians are yet to see the difference between the total collapse of security under the Buhari administration and the complete absence of security in the present government. If there is any difference at all, it is that the nation has moved from bad to worse, while the worst stares us in the face as the nation’s leadership pay us visits from their ‘work stay’ abroad.
I end this discourse with the headline. A solidarity salute to our Ajuwaya, the children of nobodies who served their country in Bandit-land! Corper Shan!
News
Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Tells FG To Retaliate Against South African Companies In Nigeria
Senator Adams Oshiomhole has called on the Federal Government to retaliate against South African businesses operating in Nigeria following the recent attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.
Speaking during plenary on Tuesday, Oshiomhole said the Federal Government should consider revoking the working license of South African owned companies such as MTN and DSTV.
He argued that Nigeria must respond firmly to what he described as persistent hostility against its citizens.
READ ALSO:South Africa To Investigate ‘Mystery’ Of Planeload Of Palestinians
“I am not going to shed tears. If you hit me, I hit you. I think it is appropriate in diplomacy. It is an economic struggle,” Oshiomhole said.
He argued that while some South Africans accuse Nigerians of taking their jobs, Nigerians should return home and take over employment opportunities created by major South African companies operating in the country, including MTN and DSTV.
“When we hit back, the President of South Africa will not only talk but will also go on his knees to recognise that Nigeria cannot be intimidated.
READ ALSO:South African Ambassador Found Dead Outside Paris Hotel
“We will not condone any life being lost. If a crime has been committed under the South African law they have the right to bring any such person to justice, but to kill our people as if we are helpless, we will not allow that,” Oshiomhole added.
DAILY POST reports that several Nigerians in South Africa have reportedly been attacked, and their businesses destroyed, in ongoing xenophobic attacks in the country.
News
IGP Orders Officers Display Name Tag On Uniform, Gives Update On State Police
The Inspector General of Police, IGP, Tunji Disu, has ordered all police personnel to always have their name tags on their uniforms for easy identification.
Disu disclosed that only police personnel who are undercover are exempted from displaying their name tags.
Speaking on Tuesday, Disu said: “All police officers should have their name tags. All of us on the high table have our names apart from the undercover among us so if you look at all the Commissioners of Police we have our name tags, so it’s not our standard.
READ ALSO:
“All the Commissioners of Police are here and that is why we called this meeting, we have list of things like this that we will want to discuss with the Commissioners of Police, we have told them earlier and we will still let them know that every that happens within their area of jurisdiction falls under their control.”
On the issue of state police, the IGP said: “Since we got the signal that the Federal Government of Nigeria intend to establish State Police and since we are the federal police, we decided to take the bull by the horn and put down our own side of what we believe on how the state police should be run.
“A lot of things were taken into consideration, a lot of comparative analysis was done and it has been transmitted to the National Assembly.”
News
Court Orders SERAP To Pay DSS Operatives N100m For Defamation
The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has ordered a non-governmental organization, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, to pay N100 million as damaged to two operatives of the Department of the State Services, DSS, for unjustly defaming them in some publications.
The court also ordered SERAP to tender public apologies to the defamed officers,
Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, in two national newspapers, two television stations and its website.
Besides, the organization was also ordered to pay the two operatives N1 million as cost of litigation and 10 percent post-judgment interest annually on the judgment sum until it’s fully liquidated.
Justice Yusuf Halilu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory gave the order on Tuesday while delivering judgment in a N5.5 billion defamation suit instituted against SERAP by the DSS operatives.
The judge found SERAP liable for unjustly defaming the two DSS operatives with allegations that they unlawfully invaded its Abuja office, harassed and intimidated its staff, in September 2024.
READ ALSO:How We Arrested Terror Suspect Who Threatened To Kill Students, Teachers In Abuja — DSS
In the offending publication on its website and Twitter handle, SERAP alleged that the two operatives unlawfully invaded and occupied its office with sinister motives.
The judge held that the publication was in bad taste especially from an organization established to promote transparency and accountability, as nothing in the publication was found to be truthful.
The DSS staff had listed SERAP as 1st defendant in the suit marked CV/4547/2024. SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, was listed as the 2nd defendant.
In the suit, the claimants – Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele – accused the two defendants of making false claims that they invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024..
Counsel to the DSS, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, had while adopting his final address in the mater urged the judge to grant all the reliefs sought by his client in the interest of justice.
READ ALSO:DSS Arrests Suspected Gunrunner, Recovers 832 Rounds Of Ammunition
He admitted that although the names of the two claimants were not mentioned in the defamation materials, they had however established substantial circumstances that they are the ones referred to in the published defamation article by SERAP on its website.
The counsel submitted that all ingredients of defamation have been clearly established and the offending publication referred to the two officials of the secret police.
However, SERAP, through its counsel, Victoria Bassey from Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, law firm, asked the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the two claimants did not establish that they were the ones referred to in the alleged defamation materials.
She said that SERAP used “DSS officials” in the alleged offending publication, adding that the two claimants must establish that they are the ones referred to before their case can succeed.
Similar arguments were canvassed by Oluwatosin Adefioye who stood for the second defendant, adding that there was no dispute in the September 9, 2024 operation of DSS in SERAP’s office.
READ ALSO:Alleged Cyberstalking: DSS Plays Video Evidence In Sowore’s Trial
He said that since SERAP in the publication did not name any particular person, the claimants must plead special circumstances that they were the ones referred to as the DSS officials.
Besides, he said that there is no organization by name Department of State Services in law, hence, DSS cannot claim being defamed adding that the only entity known to law is National Security Agency.
The claimants had in the suit stated that the alleged false claim by SERAP has negatively impacted on their reputation.
The DSS also stated, in the statement of claim, that, in line with the agency’s practice of engaging with officials of non-governmental organisations operating in the FCT to establish a relationship with their new leadership, it directed the two officials – John and Ogunleye – to visit SERAP’s office and invite them for a familiarization meeting.
The claimants added that in carrying out the directive, John and Ogunleye paid a friendly visit to SERAP’s office at 18 Bamako Street, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja on September 9 and met with one Ruth, who upon being informed about the purpose of the visit, claimed that none of SERAP’s management staff was in the country and advised that a formal letter of invitation be written by the DSS.
READ ALSO:DSS, Police Partner NCCSALW To End Terrorism, Mop Up Illegal Arms
John and Ogundele, who claimed that their interactions with Ruth were recorded, said before they immediately exited SERAP’s office, Ruth promised to inform her organisation’s management about the visit and volunteered a phone number – 08160537202.
They said it was surprising that, shortly after their visit, SERAP posted on its X (Twitter) handle – @SERAPNigeria – that officers of the DSS are presently unlawfully occupying its office.
The claimant added, “On the same day, the defendants also published a statement on SERAP’s website, which was widely reported by several media outfits, falsely alleging that some officers from the DSS, described as “a tall, large, dark-skinned woman” and “a slim, dark skinned man,” invaded their Abuja office and interrogated the staff of the first defendant (SERAP).
John and Ogundele stated that “due to the false statements published by the defendants, the DSS has been ridiculed and criticised by international agencies such as the Amnesty International and prominent members of the Nigerian society, such as Femi Falana (SAN)”.
“Due to the false statements published by the defendants, members of the public and the international community formed the opinion that the Federal Government is using the DSS to harass the defendants.”
READ ALSO:SERAP To Court: Stop CBN From ‘Implementing ‘Unlawful, Unjust ATM Fee Hike’
They added that the defendants’ statements caused harm to their reputation because the staff and management of the DSS have formed the opinion that the claimants did not follow orders and carried out an unsanctioned operation and are therefore, incompetent and unprofessional.
The claimants therefore prayed the court for the following reliefs: “An order directing the defendants to tender an apology to the claimants via the first defendant’s (SERAP’s) website, X (twitter) handle, two national daily newspapers (Punch and Vanguard) and two national news television stations (Arise Television and Channels Television) for falsely accusing the claimants of unlawfully invading the first defendant’s office and interrogating the first defendant’s staff.
“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N5 billion as damages for the libellous statements published about the claimants.
“Interest on the sum of N5b at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the date of judgment until the judgment sum is realised or liquidated.
“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N50 million as costs of this action.”
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Tinubu’s Re-election May Put An End To Nigeria — Baba Ahmed Warns
-
Metro4 days ago
I’m A Street Girl’ – Bimbo Ademoye Clashes With Area Boys [VIDEO]
-
News5 days ago
VIDEO: Moment S’Court Recognises David Mark-led ADC Leadership
-
Politics4 days ago
Senatorial Seat: Ogbakha-Edo Warns Against Imposition Of Candidates In Edo South
-
Politics4 days ago
BREAKING: 2027: Former Adamawa APC Guber Candidate, Aishatu Binani Defects To NDC
-
Business3 days ago
JUST IN: Nigerian Filling Stations Reduce Fuel Price After Hike
-
Entertainment4 days ago
Actress Eniola Badmus Gets New Federal Appointment
-
Metro5 days ago
VIDEO: Policemen Filmed Assaulting Individual In Viral Clip
-
Metro5 days ago
Robbers Raid Imo Catholic Church, Steal Holy Communion Materials
-
News4 days ago
10 African Countries With Highest Petrol Prices In Prices In April 2026