News

Obaseki And Demolished Benin Central Hospital One Year After

Published

1 year ago

March 14, 2023

Editor

Rubble on a portion of the site

By Joseph Ebi Kanjo

A Yoruba adage says: ‘Orisa bo o le gbemi, se mi bo o se ba mi’. Meaning: If a deity can’t solve one’s problem, it shouldn’t compound it.

I decided to open this piece with the above Yoruba proverb because it sums up the content of this article.

Expectation of any voter who will vote for a new government is that when such a government comes into office, it will improve the welfare of the people, the infrastructure that it (the new government) met on ground, and build on the ones in existence, etc. .

The opposite is what the Edo State Government led by Mr. Godwin Obaseki has provided for the people of the state especially the state capital.

The Obaseki-led government in Edo State has not only failed to improve most of the infrastructure it met in the state, but unfortunately it has pulled down some of the state’s old legacy projects. It will remain in the memory of the residents for a long time, if not forever.

At this juncture, I must make it clear that this piece is not political motivated neither am I paid by any group or individual, but I am just worried seeing some things happening.

It is beyond the imagination of any right thinking person that a government can wake up and its next thought is to demolish a medical facility – a 100-year-old hospital – under the guise of using the expanse of land for other purposes. What, if I may ask, is more important and necessary for the residents of the state than a medical facility?

Notably, the over 100-year-old hospital was strategically located on a piece of land that could be called the heart of Benin until it was demolished in mid-January 2022. The colonial masters who built the hospital in such a strategic place were never wrong. The idea was undoubtedly to make the hospital easily accessible to everyone, no matter where they are in the city.

Moreover, the health facility was not only well located before the demolition, but also affordable. A resort for ordinary people. A medical consultant fee of N100 (card charge), a patient gains access to medical doctor. Here, an average man takes his wife to a pregnant woman during the prenatal and postnatal period. The hospital, before it demolition, had qualified doctors and quality medical services were provided by professional doctors.

The 100-year-old Benin Central Hospital is not the only heritage project being demolished by the current Edo State government. The source of knowledge was also demolished – the state-owned library on Sapele Road, a stone’s throw from the Central Hospital. Many other private buildings too numerous to mention have been demolished and their lands revoked under the current Edo State government, but the focus of this article is not those projects but the Benin Central Hospital, the demolition of which has caused untold hardships for many, especially registered ante-natal pregnant women, yet after over a year no single structure has been erected on the site

Pregnant women are the hardest hit in this regard. The antenatal ward of the hospital has been relocated to Sickle Cell Centre on Gabriel Igbinadion Way, GRA, near the former Central Hospital Benin. Though the new location is not very far from the former central hospital, due to the city’s traffic arrangement, many of the pregnant women are forced to trek the distance. This because there are regularly ‘town service vehicles’ plying the route except can which some may not afford. So they’re mostly seen on foot especially when they are returning from the medical checkup. It has been therefore very stressful for the pregnant women.

Meanwhile, before the demolition, when the state’s main opposition party, the All Progressives Congress Party (APC), warned of plans to demolish the hospital, the Edo State government under the leadership of Obaseki denied it.

A statement signed by the state’s Assistant Publicity Secretary, Victor Osheobo had raised the alarm on how the state government plans to demolish the old hospital and replace it with an ultra-modern car park. The party argued then that the government’s justification for demolishing the hospital makes no sense.

“We call it not only strange and evil, but also unacceptable. This is because no right-thinking government wants to replace a viable medical facility with a parking lot that should be equipped and staffed to better serve the well-being of the people,” the statement said.

In addition, it has been also rumoured in some quarters that the Edo State Government under Obaseki planned to build the Edo Museum of West African Art (EMOWAA) on the expanse of land, and that this is the reason for the demolition.

But the government denied all this. Edo State Government through the then Commissioner for Communications, Mr. Andrew Emwanta, stated that the government was not planning to dismantle the medical facilities but to relocate the hospital to the Stella Obasanjo Hospital. The government argued that this will pave the way for the transformation of the 100-year-old hospital. The Commissioner said that the Central Hospital has been in existence for over 100 years; therefore, most of the facilities were very old and did not support the provision of modern care.

Either moving the old hospital to pave the way for the renovation or pulling it down completely, 13 months after no structure is erected on the land. Although active construction is currently underway, and some construction workers can be seen working on the site, which have been cordoned off with roof shingles for months, this is not what the city’s residents expect after the demolition.

Or is it the transformation of the hospital promised by the Obaseki government?

The most worrisome, after over 13 months of it demolition, most people in Benin City do not even know what the government intends to build on the land that can warrant it (the government) demolishing a hospital that is over 100 years old.

News

JUST IN: Tinubu Appoints Governing Board Members For 111 Tertiary Institutions

Published

3 hours ago

May 18, 2024

Editor

President Bola Tinubu has approved the appointments of at least 555 persons to serve as Pro-chancellors/Chairmen and members of Governing Boards of 111 federal universities, polytechnics and Colleges of Education.

This followed Tinubu’s assent to a list of nominees selected by the Ministry of Education.

An advertorial by the Education Ministry sighted by The PUNCH showed the appointment of a chairperson and four members for each of the institutions.

It was signed by the ministry’s Permanent Secretary, Mrs. Didi Esther Walson-Jack.

“The inauguration and retreat for the Governing Councils will take place on Thursday, May 30 and Friday, May 31, 2024, at the National Universities Commission, 26 Aguiyi Ironsi Street, Maitama, Abuja. Both events will commence at 9:00am daily,” said Walson-Jack.

When contacted for confirmation, the Presidency said the list emanated from the Ministry of Education.

“This is from the Federal Ministry of Education…they make the nominations and forward them to the President to sign. But they are at liberty to release it from their end,” the President’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, told The PUNCH on Sunday.

The appointments come days after the Academic Staff Union of Universities had threatened to embark on another strike, potentially disrupting the academic calendar and causing further setbacks in the country’s higher education sector.

The union, on Tuesday, decried the failure of the Federal Government to appoint Governing Councils for federal universities.

The union also faulted what it described as the nonchalant attitude of the President Bola Tinubu-led Federal Government to matters about academics in federal universities.

The body of academics, during a briefing at the University of Abuja, also faulted the 35 per cent salary increment for professors and the 25 per cent salary increment for other academics in the university system.

News

HOMEF Applauds NASS On Decision To Investigate GMOs In Nigeria

Published

3 hours ago

May 18, 2024

Editor

…says Nigeria needs to prioritise public health

Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) and the GMO-Free Nigeria
Alliance have commended the House of Representatives on the resolution to comprehensively investigate the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into Nigeria and for a halt on approval of new products
pending the completion of that investigation.

This is as the House of Representatives also urged the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) to ensure labelling of GM crops already in the country.

The House resolution to investigate the introduction of GMOs into Nigeria followed the adoption of a motion by Rep. Muktar Shagaya at a plenary session held on Thursday 16th May 2024.

In a statement made available to INFO DAILY Kome Odhomor, Media/Communication Lead, HOMEF, the Executive Director of the organisation, Dr Nnimmo Bassey, said ass the lawmaker rightly explained, the introduction of GMOs in Nigeria raises serious concerns about safety, regulatory oversight, and their potential impacts on the country’s biosafety.

He noted that the investigation which has been long “overdue is vital to save the country from the dangerous path to food colonialism, contamination of our genetic resources, loss of
biodiversity/nutritional diversity, soil degradation, and overall
disruption of our agriculture and food systems.”

Bassey continued: “This investigation must be unbiased and thorough. To ensure this, the National Assembly should engage independent researchers to avoid contamination of the process by GMO promoters.

“This investigation should consider Nigeria’s agricultural landscape and investigate the underlying
causes of hunger/food insecurity and as well establish definite measures to address those issues. This is the time to rescue Nigerians from being used for risky experimentations.”

The Executive Director also stressed the need for critical examination of the National Biosafety Management Agency Act for its fitness for purpose.

He further added: “That law needs to be completely reworked to close existing loopholes including the composition of its governing/decision making board by excluding GMO promoters such as the National Biotechnology Development Agency; the lack of provision on strict liability, inadequate public consultation measures, absolute decision-making powers of the agency, minimal reference to the precautionary principal and many others.

“This was the submission of Mariann Bassey-Orovwuje, Food Sovereignty Activist and Deputy Executive Director at Friends of the Earth Nigeria.”

Also reacting to the Green Chamber’s call on NAFDAC to label GMO crops in the country, HOMEF’s Director of Programmes and lead on Hunger Politics, Joyce Brown, noted that the agency will need to devise strategies to have foods sold in local markets in basins, by the road sides, and in processed forms like Ogi and Akara labelled to ensure informed decision-making by the majority of people who purchase food from these sources.

“This exercise will prove that GMOs do not fit our socio-economic context. Over the years, market shelf surveys conducted by HOMEF has revealed over 50 different processed/packaged foods labelled as produced using genetically modified ingredients,” she added.

Brown advised that permits for commercialisation of GMO products such as Bt Cowpea, Tela Maize, Bt Corn and all others be suspended pending the result of the investigation by the House Committee on Agriculture and others.

The statement reaffirmed the submission by Rep. Shagaya that there’s need to prioritise public health, biodiversity, increased support of small holder farmers in terms of extension service, provision of infrastructure (to curtail waste), access to credits, access to land and the growth of our local economy.

“Nigeria should adopt agroecological farming which aligns well with our socio economic and socio cultural
context. Agroecology delivers increased productivity and economic resilience, revises/nourishes ecosystems, strengthens local economies, mitigates climate change and promotes food sovereignty,” the statement concluded.

News

Mother Of Five Jailed For Forging Late Abba Kyari’s Signature

Published

12 hours ago

May 18, 2024

Editor

A mother of five, Ramat Mba, has been sentenced to one-year imprisonment by a Federal Capital Territory High Court sitting in Gwagwalada, Abuja, for her involvement in an employment scam.

Ramat who was also found guilty of forging the signature of the late Abba Kyari, the Chief of Staff to the former President, Muhammadu Buhari, was arraigned before the court by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on a 5-count bordering on cheating, fraud and forgery, contrary to Section 13 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000 and Sections 320(b), 366 of the Penal Code Cap 89 laws of Northern Nigeria.

She reportedly committed the offence sometime in 2020 when she collected N4.5 million from several job seekers, promising to secure jobs for them with the ICPC and National Air Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA).

Also, the documentary evidence tendered showed that the convict fraudulently forged the letterhead of the Office of the Chief of Staff to former President Buhari and his signature. The letter, addressed to the ICPC Chairman, was a request for the recruitment of three individuals by the commission.

However, the late CoS, in a written correspondence that was also tendered in court as an exhibit, distanced himself or his office from authorising the letter.

Commenting on the sentencing, spokesperson for the ICPC, Demola Bakare said;

“The trial judge, Justice Muhammad, in his judgment on May 9, 2024, convicted the mother of five children on counts 1, 2, 3 and 5 that border on cheating and forgery, while she was discharged on count 4 which borders on felony.

“Justice Muhammad, during the sentencing on Thursday, pronounced a six-month jail term or N100,000 option of fine on counts 1, 2 and 3 on the convict.

“The presiding judge, who stressed the status of the convict as a first-time offender and a mother, also sentenced her to one-year imprisonment or N150,000 option on fine on count 5 which borders on forgery.”