Connect with us

News

OPINION: An Imam And Humanity’s True Definition

Published

on

By Suyi Ayodele

A Muslim friend, at the weekend, drew my attention to a 58-second video of how Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) responded to the woman who daily hauled debris at the Prophet whenever he passed by her house.

According to the narrator, the woman, who lived in Mecca during the time of the Great Prophet (PBUH), disliked the Prophet so much that every morning, whenever the Prophet passed by her house, she would throw debris at the man. The Prophet, the narrator said, would silently walk through the debris, saying nothing. That act went on for a long time.

Advertisement

Then one day, Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) walked by the woman’s house and he noticed that nobody threw any debris at him. The Prophet found that unusual and asked about the woman. A neighbour told the Prophet that the woman was sick. There, on the spot, the Prophet entered the woman’s house to inquire about her health.

The woman, upon sighting Prophet Mohammed (PBUH), was said to have broken down in tears and asked: “You came to help me, even after all I did to you?” The Prophet’s response is my key point here: “Yes. Kindness my way.” The Prophet responded! The video ended. I asked those knowledgeable about Islam what happened thereafter, and I was told that the woman became the most adherent follower of Prophet Mohammed (PBUNH) and his teachings.

Because of the way and manner, the Islamic religion was introduced to my part of the country in the 19th century, the people responded to the new faith with a lot of resentment. They labelled the practitioners of the religion as ìmòle (people of religion of force). Converting many of the people to Islam became a herculean task.

Advertisement

The adherents of the religion too did not relent. A lot of efforts were made to disabuse the minds of the people about the religion, its tenets and outlook. One of such efforts resulted in the composition of the following lyrics:

E má pe Mùsùlùmí ló ni ìmòle – Don’t call Muslims as people of religion of force

Èsìn àlááfià kìi se ìmòle – A religion of peace is not a religion of force

Advertisement

Ení bá pe Mùsùlùmí ló ni ìmòle – Whoever calls Muslims as people of religion of force

Kò kéwú, kògbedè aláìmòkan ni – Is he who does not learn Quranic recitation, nor understands Arabic, a complete ignoramus

The above is known as Waka in Yoruba Language. The Islamic-oriented Yoruba music genre was introduced to convince the people then that contrary to the perceived forceful nature that generation of adherents of Islam adopted in selling the new faith to the people, the religion is peaceful after all.

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: The Guest Who Ate Before The Owner

Waka, therefore, became a praise song to sermonise the peaceful nature of the religion, and the fact that whatever negative connotations ascribed to it were fuelled more by ignorance than the reality of the nature of the religion. It is mostly sung during crusades known as Waasi, and other social gatherings where Islamic scholars of yore often quoted relevant verses of the Quran to show that the religion does not allow anyone to kill anybody based on his or her faith.

In our contemporary time, nothing demonstrates the message contained in the lyrics more than the 2018 episode in Nghar village in Barkin Ladi Local Government Area of Plateau State, where an Islamic leader and Chief Imam of the village, Imam Abdullahi Abubakar, saved the lives of 262 Christians who were on the verge of being killed by some Islamic fundamentalists.

Advertisement

Imam Abdullahi Abubakar, who died on Thursday, January 15, 2026, at the ripe age of 92, was 84 years old when he risked all he had to save the lives of the Christians in his community. The story of Imam Abubakar’s heroic deed went global. Ten communities in the locality were under attack during the June 2018 crisis in Plateau State.

Gunmen who claimed to be Islamic fundamentalists subjected the Christian communities in the area to untold hardship. Many were pursued and killed in brutal manners. The news of the attack spread like a wildfire. When it got to Nghar village, Imam Abubakar did what the Holy writ, Quaran, stipulates in Quran 68:8, to wit: Non-Muslims of goodwill and peace should not be targets of war simply due to their faith.

While other people in the village shut their doors against the fleeing Christians who had suddenly become endangered, Imam Abubakar opened not just the doors of his mosque, but those of his home to shield the would-be victims from their attackers.

Advertisement

I have tried to picture the situation in my mind. I have tried to imagine a frail-looking 84-year-old man standing by the door, talking to gun-wielding men and some others carrying other lethal weapons. What was he telling them? How did he summon the courage to hide those 262 Christians? What verse of the Quran did he recite to convince the murderous crowd?

Again, and more importantly, what if the attackers had overpowered him? What would have been the fate of members of his immediate family who were equally holed up in the mosque and the house where the fleeing Christians were quartered? Who takes such a risk Imam Abubakar took when he refused to surrender the victims to their attackers even when he came under direct threat of the assailants?

One account of that incident stated that Imam Abubaka told the assailants that, having sought refuge in his mosque and home, the Christians inside had automatically become Muslims and the Holy Prophet, Mohammed (PBUH), forbade anyone to kill them. He was said to have further argued with the bloodthirsty assailants that the Christians running into the mosque and his home could be likened to the holy flight of Prophet Mohammed (PBUH), from Mecca to Medina, adding that Islam supports the concept of asylum. How persuasive could an 84-year-old man be?

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: Nigeria Deserves A President Donald Trump

Tragically, about 80 other Christians who could not make it to Imam Abubakar’s abode were mercilessly slaughtered by their attackers. If the Islamic cleric had not risked his life for the ones who sought refuge in his house, the casualty figure would have been 342 souls lost to cold hands of death in the hands of those who claimed to be fighting Allah’s battle! What a beautiful soul Imam Abubakar was!

While reflecting on Imam Abdullahi Abubakar’s life and times, two issues defined his heroic deed of June 2018. The first is humanity, and the second is patriotism. On the issue of humanity, especially as preached by many great Islamic scholars,

Advertisement

This narrative is the real definition of humanity. Humanity without a touch of kindness amounts to bestiality. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) says: Yes. Kindness is my way”, no matter the circumstance. Only a man with milk of kindness would risk his life for the safety of people of a different faith the way Imam Abdullahi Abubakar did in 2018. There is no record to show that he was lettered. He was simply a man convinced about the tenets of his faith

Today, in the same Nigeria where Imam Abubakar lived and died, we have professors and PhD holders, who, if they found themselves in the position of Imam Abubakar, would have supplied the matchets for the mass slaughtering of the 262 Christians the Imam saved.

And we should get this right: Imam Abubakar did not protect those hundreds of Christians because they were Christians. He protected them because the milk of kindness, which epitomises humanity, runs in his veins. If Imam Abubakar were to hail from my part of this country, his name would have been: Ìwàlèsìn (Character is religion). Only a man of character, not faith, does what the Islamic leader did. Little wonder he lived to a very good ripe age amid his people. Isaiah the prophet says: “Tell the righteous it will be well with them, for they will enjoy the fruit of their deeds” (Isaiah 3:10). That prophecy, I submit here, is fulfilled in Imam Abubakar!

Advertisement

And this brings us to the late Imam’s sense of patriotism. Reflecting deeply on that June 2018 heroic deed, I concluded that the late Abdullahi Abubakar’s sense of patriotism must have been top-notch! One could imagine the ripple effects if he had allowed the attackers access to their would-be victims. How would the people from the ethnic stock of the victims have reacted?

Patriotism goes beyond the denotative implication of ‘one being devoted to or supportive of one’s country’. It entails giving all for the betterment of one’s nation. Sadly, this is the most important quality our leaders lack. Beyond singing the National Anthem and reciting the National Pledge, our leaders have nothing speaking for them in terms of patriotism. That is why they don’t blink while pilfering our patrimony.

Nigeria today is a Federal Republic because some men and women fought a gruesome 30-month civil war to keep the nation one. During that war (May 1967-Janury 1970), over two million Nigerians were killed on both sides of the divide (Nigeria and Biafra). To commemorate the sad event, a day was set aside on January 15 of every year to honour the memories of those who paid the supreme price for Nigeria to be one.

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: Don Pedro And Beautiful Benin

Known as Armed Forces Remembrance Day, this year’s own was celebrated without the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Nigerian Armed Forces, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, being present. Pray, which nation celebrates its Armed Forces Remembrance Day without its C-in-C in attendance? That is how unpatriotic our leaders could be!

The argument advanced for the absence of the President at such a national memorial event is that he was in a foreign country on an assignment for the economy of the nation. But like the proverbial crab and its-three-year-labour at the mill without its palm oil filling a small tin (Odún méta tí alákàn ti ńse epo, kò kún agolo, òfo ló já sí) what has been the benefits of the numerous globe-trotting by President Tinubu since he assumed office in 2023?

Advertisement

Good enough that Tinubu remembered to pay tribute, despite his ‘tight schedule’ overseas, to Imam Abubakar at his passing. It is incumbent on us, therefore, to impose it on the President that it is not enough to use flowery words to describe the late Islamic leader as a man who “stood firmly on the side of peace, benevolence, and conscience”, choosing “humanity over division, love as opposed to hatred, and embrace rather than rejection.”

President Tinubu should walk the talk by showing that level of ‘benevolence’ displayed by Imam Abubakar. The President should have pity on the hapless citizens who suffer daily under the weight of the traumatic economic policies of his administration. He should save Nigerians from imminent deaths from hunger and starvation the way Imam Abubakar rescued those 262 Nigerians from the jaws of death. That is humanity; that is kindness.

Tinubu should also stand on the side of good ‘conscience’, be humane and also ‘exemplify’ “the kind of humanity and moral courage” Imam Abubakar exhibited by staying focused in confronting the problems bedevilling this nation. The greatest tribute our President can pay to Imam Abubakar is to halt his decoyed medical tourism and the vomitous act of disappearing without notifying the people as if he were not elected by human beings. Even if he has succeeded in capturing the nation and its people, President Tinubu should stop flaunting that at our faces all the time!

Advertisement

Imam Abdullahi Abubakar died a hero. His children and relations alike should be consoled that, in addition to reaching a ripe age, their patriarch represented the true definition of humanity. Theirs is a glorious and proud heritage! In my small library are two portraits of my father and my father-in-law, two men whose deeds indicated that humanity exists. I am adding a third portrait, and you can guess whose it would be: Imam Abdullahi Abubakar, the Grand Humanity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (GHFRN). He showed us what humanity looks like in its physical form! Rest on, Imam Abdullahi Abubakar.

Advertisement
Comments

News

Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Tells FG To Retaliate Against South African Companies In Nigeria

Published

on

Senator Adams Oshiomhole has called on the Federal Government to retaliate against South African businesses operating in Nigeria following the recent attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

Speaking during plenary on Tuesday, Oshiomhole said the Federal Government should consider revoking the working license of South African owned companies such as MTN and DSTV.

He argued that Nigeria must respond firmly to what he described as persistent hostility against its citizens.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:South Africa To Investigate ‘Mystery’ Of Planeload Of Palestinians

“I am not going to shed tears. If you hit me, I hit you. I think it is appropriate in diplomacy. It is an economic struggle,” Oshiomhole said.

He argued that while some South Africans accuse Nigerians of taking their jobs, Nigerians should return home and take over employment opportunities created by major South African companies operating in the country, including MTN and DSTV.

Advertisement

When we hit back, the President of South Africa will not only talk but will also go on his knees to recognise that Nigeria cannot be intimidated.

READ ALSO:South African Ambassador Found Dead Outside Paris Hotel

We will not condone any life being lost. If a crime has been committed under the South African law they have the right to bring any such person to justice, but to kill our people as if we are helpless, we will not allow that,” Oshiomhole added.

Advertisement

DAILY POST reports that several Nigerians in South Africa have reportedly been attacked, and their businesses destroyed, in ongoing xenophobic attacks in the country.

Continue Reading

News

IGP Orders Officers Display Name Tag On Uniform, Gives Update On State Police

Published

on

The Inspector General of Police, IGP, Tunji Disu, has ordered all police personnel to always have their name tags on their uniforms for easy identification.

Disu disclosed that only police personnel who are undercover are exempted from displaying their name tags.

Speaking on Tuesday, Disu said: “All police officers should have their name tags. All of us on the high table have our names apart from the undercover among us so if you look at all the Commissioners of Police we have our name tags, so it’s not our standard.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:

All the Commissioners of Police are here and that is why we called this meeting, we have list of things like this that we will want to discuss with the Commissioners of Police, we have told them earlier and we will still let them know that every that happens within their area of jurisdiction falls under their control.”

On the issue of state police, the IGP said: “Since we got the signal that the Federal Government of Nigeria intend to establish State Police and since we are the federal police, we decided to take the bull by the horn and put down our own side of what we believe on how the state police should be run.

Advertisement

“A lot of things were taken into consideration, a lot of comparative analysis was done and it has been transmitted to the National Assembly.”

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Court Orders SERAP To Pay DSS Operatives N100m For Defamation

Published

on

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has ordered a non-governmental organization, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, to pay N100 million as damaged to two operatives of the Department of the State Services, DSS, for unjustly defaming them in some publications.

The court also ordered SERAP to tender public apologies to the defamed officers,
Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, in two national newspapers, two television stations and its website.

Besides, the organization was also ordered to pay the two operatives N1 million as cost of litigation and 10 percent post-judgment interest annually on the judgment sum until it’s fully liquidated.

Advertisement

Justice Yusuf Halilu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory gave the order on Tuesday while delivering judgment in a N5.5 billion defamation suit instituted against SERAP by the DSS operatives.

The judge found SERAP liable for unjustly defaming the two DSS operatives with allegations that they unlawfully invaded its Abuja office, harassed and intimidated its staff, in September 2024.

READ ALSO:How We Arrested Terror Suspect Who Threatened To Kill Students, Teachers In Abuja — DSS

Advertisement

In the offending publication on its website and Twitter handle, SERAP alleged that the two operatives unlawfully invaded and occupied its office with sinister motives.

The judge held that the publication was in bad taste especially from an organization established to promote transparency and accountability, as nothing in the publication was found to be truthful.

The DSS staff had listed SERAP as 1st defendant in the suit marked CV/4547/2024. SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, was listed as the 2nd defendant.

Advertisement

In the suit, the claimants – Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele – accused the two defendants of making false claims that they invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024..

Counsel to the DSS, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, had while adopting his final address in the mater urged the judge to grant all the reliefs sought by his client in the interest of justice.

READ ALSO:DSS Arrests Suspected Gunrunner, Recovers 832 Rounds Of Ammunition

Advertisement

He admitted that although the names of the two claimants were not mentioned in the defamation materials, they had however established substantial circumstances that they are the ones referred to in the published defamation article by SERAP on its website.

The counsel submitted that all ingredients of defamation have been clearly established and the offending publication referred to the two officials of the secret police.

However, SERAP, through its counsel, Victoria Bassey from Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, law firm, asked the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the two claimants did not establish that they were the ones referred to in the alleged defamation materials.

Advertisement

She said that SERAP used “DSS officials” in the alleged offending publication, adding that the two claimants must establish that they are the ones referred to before their case can succeed.

Similar arguments were canvassed by Oluwatosin Adefioye who stood for the second defendant, adding that there was no dispute in the September 9, 2024 operation of DSS in SERAP’s office.

READ ALSO:Alleged Cyberstalking: DSS Plays Video Evidence In Sowore’s Trial

Advertisement

He said that since SERAP in the publication did not name any particular person, the claimants must plead special circumstances that they were the ones referred to as the DSS officials.

Besides, he said that there is no organization by name Department of State Services in law, hence, DSS cannot claim being defamed adding that the only entity known to law is National Security Agency.

The claimants had in the suit stated that the alleged false claim by SERAP has negatively impacted on their reputation.

Advertisement

The DSS also stated, in the statement of claim, that, in line with the agency’s practice of engaging with officials of non-governmental organisations operating in the FCT to establish a relationship with their new leadership, it directed the two officials – John and Ogunleye – to visit SERAP’s office and invite them for a familiarization meeting.

The claimants added that in carrying out the directive, John and Ogunleye paid a friendly visit to SERAP’s office at 18 Bamako Street, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja on September 9 and met with one Ruth, who upon being informed about the purpose of the visit, claimed that none of SERAP’s management staff was in the country and advised that a formal letter of invitation be written by the DSS.

READ ALSO:DSS, Police Partner NCCSALW To End Terrorism, Mop Up Illegal Arms

Advertisement

John and Ogundele, who claimed that their interactions with Ruth were recorded, said before they immediately exited SERAP’s office, Ruth promised to inform her organisation’s management about the visit and volunteered a phone number – 08160537202.

They said it was surprising that, shortly after their visit, SERAP posted on its X (Twitter) handle – @SERAPNigeria – that officers of the DSS are presently unlawfully occupying its office.

The claimant added, “On the same day, the defendants also published a statement on SERAP’s website, which was widely reported by several media outfits, falsely alleging that some officers from the DSS, described as “a tall, large, dark-skinned woman” and “a slim, dark skinned man,” invaded their Abuja office and interrogated the staff of the first defendant (SERAP).

Advertisement

John and Ogundele stated that “due to the false statements published by the defendants, the DSS has been ridiculed and criticised by international agencies such as the Amnesty International and prominent members of the Nigerian society, such as Femi Falana (SAN)”.

“Due to the false statements published by the defendants, members of the public and the international community formed the opinion that the Federal Government is using the DSS to harass the defendants.”

READ ALSO:SERAP To Court: Stop CBN From ‘Implementing ‘Unlawful, Unjust ATM Fee Hike’

Advertisement

They added that the defendants’ statements caused harm to their reputation because the staff and management of the DSS have formed the opinion that the claimants did not follow orders and carried out an unsanctioned operation and are therefore, incompetent and unprofessional.

The claimants therefore prayed the court for the following reliefs: “An order directing the defendants to tender an apology to the claimants via the first defendant’s (SERAP’s) website, X (twitter) handle, two national daily newspapers (Punch and Vanguard) and two national news television stations (Arise Television and Channels Television) for falsely accusing the claimants of unlawfully invading the first defendant’s office and interrogating the first defendant’s staff.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N5 billion as damages for the libellous statements published about the claimants.

Advertisement

“Interest on the sum of N5b at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the date of judgment until the judgment sum is realised or liquidated.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N50 million as costs of this action.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending