Headline

OPINION: Reps’ Drunkard Democracy

Published

2 years ago

June 24, 2024

By Lasisi Olagunju

I had thought that our lawmakers in Abuja cared only for big cars, big bucks and big boobs. I never knew they also have deep love for alcohol – dry gin – and would do anything to protect it from the ravages of restrictive laws. And, because the standards of public and private morality have fallen terribly low, I feel we had better talk now before our democracy becomes synonymous with kaikai, with shekpe, ogogoro and ogwofy.

“No man’s life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in session…” is one very popular quote found in an 1866 New York court decision. The judge was Gideon Tucker. Given what we see daily here, I wonder how many Nigerians will say today that the judge lied.

There is this agency called NAFDAC which first barged in on our consciousness when adorable Dora Akunyili was its boss. That woman fought many wars – the one we knew she lost publicly was her long battle with cancer. May God continue to rest her beautiful soul.

The agency she nurtured is never short of wars. It was created to be constantly in the trenches. Some destinies are that wired. And, it has forever been that for NAFDAC. Because of ogogoro, the agency, this moment, faces a low-intensity battle from one of the chambers that make laws for our country.

Whether gin or jenever, spirit drink was at a time here famously called ‘fire-water.’ And, as that name predicts, uncontrolled liquor is fire, it burns the body and chars the soul.

So, on 21 May 2010, at the 63rd World Health Assembly in Geneva, the 193 member-states of the World Health Organisation adopted what they called “global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol.” Nigeria was there, it participated actively in the deliberations, and it signed, pledging its commitment to that policy. The subsequent alcohol-in-sachets ban by our government was an activation of Nigeria’s fidelity to that commitment.

On February 1, 2024, NAFDAC announced that it had started the enforcement of the ban of alcohol sold in sachet or in less than 200ml PET bottles. If that agency and, particularly, its Director General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, thought the announcement was the end of those small stuffs, they were mistaken. The agency, mid last week, told the press that it was being ‘advised’ by the House of Representatives to lift the ban. It said several meetings had been held on this between them and the lawmakers.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: For Yoruba Muslims And Pentecostals

Something is not clear to me here. The Green Chamber can soak itself in green bottles, our health authorities have not said it shouldn’t. The people who have crossed the river of fortune to the opulent side called the House of Representatives do not drink what NAFDAC banned. Indeed, what they drink no one dare ban. So, of all the existential problems besetting Nigerians, the priority of the National Assembly is Sapele water retailed in abject packs. Are the lawmakers in sympathy-bed with the poor drinkers or with the affluent merchants?

I am shocked that our Reps do not care that official statistics say abuse of alcohol (especially gin in small packs) accounts for 50 percent of road accidents and for 29 percent of deaths in Nigeria. I am also curious to know why a House presided over by a northern Muslim speaker will be making a strong case for easy access to strong drinks. Where the speaker hails from, alcohol sale and consumption have been illegal there since Uthman Dan Fodio’s Jihad of 1804. But NAFDAC’s press statement said the last pro-alcohol-in-sachet meeting of Thursday, June 13, 2024 was at the instance of the speaker and it held in his office with his Chief of Staff standing in for him!

Sometimes you watch drunk bus drivers and tipsy okada riders doing suicidal, homicidal spins. You see them poor and broken and you wonder how they fund their regular inebriation. The answer is in the cheap cost of alcohol in sachets and in small bottles. It is the affordability and the accessibility and the havoc it wreaks that the ban targets.

Because pure water costs more than dry gin in sachet, you can’t use cost to convince the guzzlers to stitch their throats against the burns of the fire they drink. We’ve always had alcohol abuse challenges in this country. There was a time under the British when gin functioned as convertible currency. In one instance, some unscrupulous government officials were accused of accepting gin as payment for fines. Today, there is an epidemic of drunkenness, even among children.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Murder And Vengeance In Okuama

“Children who drink alcohol are more likely to use drugs, get bad grades, suffer injury or death, engage in risky sexual activity, make bad decisions, and have health problems,” NAFDAC’s Director-General, Professor Adeyeye, said in February this year while explaining that the ban was focused on controlling unrestricted underage access to alcoholic drinks. She said “It is a response to the growing concerns about the health risks associated with excessive alcohol consumption, particularly among the youths who are the primary consumers of these sachet and small bottle alcoholic beverages.”

I thought lawmakers are leaders and leaders exist to protect the led from all forms of harm – including from affordable spirits.

On September 1, 2005, BBC’s Africa Live opened a discussion on whether home-brewed alcohol had a place in modern Africa. It mentioned Ogogoro in Nigeria, Umkomboti in South Africa, Nsafufuo or Muratina in Ghana and Chang’aa in Kenya. The BBC got varied and very interesting responses from across the continent. The one from Nigeria particularly interests me. One Owolabi Kayode from Nigeria told the BBC that: “In Nigeria among the lower classes, local brew has become an integral part of their every day diet. As early as 0700 in the morning you find people at the bus park taking their usual ‘shot’ as they call it. The most painful part of it all is that the bus drivers also ‘mark register’ with the sellers. Hence, I am of the opinion that it does more harm than good to the society, as these drinks cause more health problem to these folks.” You and I know that what that fellow told the BBC 19 years ago was very true then and it is truer now. If there is any variation between what was in 2005 and what is now, it is just that spirit in sachet has largely displaced local brews.

History is a beast. It repeats itself in very ghastly details. Long before independence; in fact, long before amalgamation, the white man was torn, as our lawmakers are today, between stopping our people from destroying themselves with cheap liquor and protecting the business interest of white importers of spirit drinks.

From the last decades of the 19th century to the first two decades of the 20th, a robust campaign against the liquor trade was met with equal response by the importers. Pro-liquor government officials argue that “drink produces an amount of revenue which cannot be surrendered without a complete dislocation of finances.” The abolitionists sneered at what they called the “moral bankruptcy” of the officials. The British House of Commons took a hard stance against this drink pejoratively called ‘fire-water’ on 24 April, 1888. The 1890 Brussels Conference of the European Powers in Africa had time to also consider the matter. It banned the spread of liquor sale to “where it had not yet been established” – northern Nigeria. Lord Lugard, in a confidential memo dated 8 April, 1916 described the liquor trade as “a sterile import which does not improve the standard of life or add to the well-being and comfort of the people.” The colonial government subsequently tried all tricks to tackle the gin trade. It imposed higher import duties, it didn’t work. It ordered a reduction in the quality and ‘strength’ of the drinks; the drinkers drank heavily still. Then in January 1919, the government “prohibited the importation of spirits into Africa. This was effected in Nigeria by the Customs Tariff Ordinance (1916) of 25 March, 1919”.

I suggest that our lawmakers read Ayodeji Olukoju’s ‘Rotgut and Revenue: Fiscal Aspects of the Liquor Trade in Southern Nigeria, 1890-1919’. I drew the above from there, and from Richard M. Bird’s ‘Taxing Alcohol in Nigeria’. I also drew strength from other related sources. During his time, the white man chose the side of humanity – he took measures that disincentivized buying alcohol cheap and drinking alcohol heavy. Our current lawmakers can help protect the law by not getting our democracy drunk. They will do this by pocketing their lift-the-ban advice. It is a poisonous brew.

Headline

Moving Abroad? Essential Things Nigerians Should Pack Before Leaving Nigeria

Published

6 hours ago

September 22, 2026

Editor

Moving abroad from Nigeria is one of those life changes that makes a suitcase suddenly feel much smaller.

What looks like enough luggage in your bedroom can seem painfully limited once you start choosing between clothes, documents, electronics, personal care items and the small things that make an unfamiliar place feel like home.

That is why a good diaspora relocation packing list guide should not be about squeezing everything possible into your bags. It should help you decide what deserves precious luggage space, what can be bought after arrival and what should never go into your suitcase in the first place.

The distinction matters because airlines have strict baggage limits, while destination countries have their own customs rules.

Baggage allowances vary by airline, route, cabin class and aircraft, while individual checked bags are generally recommended not to exceed 23kg for handling reasons. Power banks and spare lithium batteries, for example, must generally remain in carry-on baggage rather than checked luggage.

Start with documents, not clothes

Before thinking about clothing or food, create a secure travel folder for the documents you cannot afford to lose. Your passport, visa or residence documentation, flight information, accommodation details, employment or school documents, insurance information and important contact details should stay accessible throughout the journey.

Carry originals where necessary and keep encrypted digital copies or secure backups of important documents. If you are relocating with children, their birth certificates, school records, vaccination documentation and immigration papers may also be important depending on the destination and circumstances.

Do not put irreplaceable documents in checked luggage. A suitcase can be delayed, misrouted or damaged, but losing access to your passport or immigration paperwork at the same time can turn a manageable travel problem into a serious one.

Pack for your first two weeks, not your entire future

One of the easiest ways to overpack is to imagine every possible situation you might encounter after moving. Resist that temptation. Your first luggage should support your transition, not reproduce your entire Nigerian household overseas.

Pack enough everyday clothes for your initial period, but consider the climate of your destination before filling a suitcase with Nigerian weather essentials. A person moving to the UK in winter, for instance, needs a very different wardrobe from someone moving to a warmer country.

The better strategy is to prioritize versatile clothing that can be layered and reused. Comfortable shoes, underwear, sleepwear, basic toiletries and weather-appropriate outerwear deserve more attention than multiple outfits you may rarely wear.

This also reflects advice commonly shared in relocation communities: keep an “open first” collection of essentials so you are not searching through every box or suitcase when you are exhausted after arrival. The practical principle is simple, make your first few days easy before worrying about everything else.

Take the Nigerian items that are genuinely difficult to replace

Food is where relocation packing becomes particularly personal. Nigerians living abroad frequently mention missing familiar foods and ingredients, especially regional items that may be difficult to find or expensive in ordinary supermarkets.

Discussions among Nigerians abroad show that the issue is not necessarily basic rice, pasta or common spices; it is often the distinctive ingredients and flavors associated with home.

That does not mean you should fill an entire suitcase with food.

Instead, prioritise small quantities of dry, commercially packaged items that are legal to import into your destination and that you genuinely use. Depending on the destination, these could include permitted spice blends, seasoning, certain dried ingredients or packaged Nigerian foods.

However, never assume that because something is dry, packaged or commonly carried by other Nigerians, it is automatically permitted. Import rules differ significantly between countries.

For Great Britain, for example, travelers can bring some packaged foods such as biscuits, chocolate, pasta and packaged soup, while meat, dairy, fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds can be subject to restrictions.

The EU is stricter in several respects. Travelers arriving from outside the EU generally cannot bring meat or dairy products into the bloc, although specific exemptions apply to certain products and circumstances.

So if you are relocating from Nigeria to London, Paris, Amsterdam or another destination, check the destination’s official customs rules before sealing that bag of food.

Do not sacrifice luggage space for easily replaceable goods

A relocation suitcase should contain things that solve a problem, preserve something important or save you meaningful money—not everything you happen to own.

Basic toiletries, ordinary kitchen utensils, cheap hangers, bulky bedding and generic household products can often be purchased after arrival. Carrying large quantities simply because they are cheaper in Nigeria may not make economic sense once excess-baggage charges and limited suitcase space are considered.

The same applies to appliances. Check the electrical system and plug standard of your destination before taking Nigerian appliances abroad. A device that is cheap to replace may not be worth carrying if it is incompatible with the local voltage or requires additional equipment.

Ask yourself a blunt question before packing anything: Would I still pay to transport this if I had to buy extra luggage for it? If the answer is no, leave it behind.

Give electronics and valuables special treatment

Your laptop, phone, chargers, external drives, camera equipment and other essential electronics should be packed with both security and airline rules in mind.

Keep valuable electronics in your carry-on whenever the airline permits it. IATA specifically advises passengers not to place valuable or irreplaceable items in checked baggage, while spare batteries and power banks have specific restrictions because of fire risk.

Keep chargers organized in a small pouch rather than scattering them throughout your luggage. If you use several devices, label unfamiliar cables before leaving Nigeria; it sounds trivial until you are sitting in temporary accommodation with three identical USB cables and no idea which one powers your laptop.

Think about health and personal-care essentials

Your relocation luggage should also cover the personal items that may be inconvenient to replace immediately. Prescription medicines, if applicable, should remain in their original packaging and be accompanied by the documentation required by the destination country.

Basic toiletries and personal-care products that you know work for you can be worth carrying in reasonable quantities, particularly during the first few weeks when you are still learning where to shop.

Do not, however, turn your suitcase into a pharmacy. Check the rules of the destination country for medicines and controlled substances before traveling, because something legally purchased in Nigeria may have different restrictions elsewhere.

Leave prohibited and questionable items behind

Some of the worst relocation-packing decisions are made with the assumption that customs officers will not notice.

That is a dangerous gamble. The UK, for example, prohibits or restricts items including controlled drugs, offensive weapons, certain endangered species and personal imports of meat and dairy products from most non-EU countries.

Food restrictions also deserve serious attention. If you arrive in Great Britain with banned food and declare it, the Border Force can confiscate and destroy it; failing to declare prohibited products can result in penalties or prosecution.

When in doubt, check the official customs guidance for your destination before packing. If an item requires a permit, certificate or declaration, find that out before you arrive at the airport, not while standing in front of a customs officer.

Build one ‘first-night’ bag

Finally, separate the things you will need immediately from everything else.

Your first-night bag should contain a change of clothes, basic toiletries, essential documents, medications, chargers, important electronics and anything else you would need if your checked luggage were delayed. This simple step can save you considerable stress during the first 24 hours.

Your relocation luggage should make your new beginning easier, not burden you with your old life. Pack the things that are valuable, difficult to replace, culturally meaningful or immediately useful. Leave behind what is cheap, bulky and readily available.

Most importantly, remember that your airline’s baggage allowance and your destination country’s customs rules are separate issues. Staying within the weight limit does not mean every item inside the suitcase is legally admissible.

IATA emphasises that baggage conditions remain airline-specific, while governments set their own customs and import requirements.

For Nigerians relocating abroad, the smartest suitcase is therefore not necessarily the heaviest one. It is the one that contains exactly what you will need to begin your new life with less stress, fewer unnecessary expenses and no avoidable customs problems.
(TRIBUNE)

Headline

Why I Forgave Lindsay Clancy For Killing Our Children — Ex-husband Patrick

Published

6 hours ago

September 22, 2026

Editor

Patrick Clancy, the ex-husband of Lindsay Clancy, has spoken about his decision to forgive her for the deaths of their three children, saying he feared he would be “eaten up inside forever” if he could not reach a point of forgiveness.

In a new interview with CBS, Patrick said he believed he had done the best he could while his then-wife struggled with mental illness.

“I didn’t know how to manage a [postpartum illness]. I think mental illness has this ability to be tragically deceptive,” he said.

“When it comes to forgiveness, I also felt that if I didn’t get there, I would be eaten up inside forever,” he added.

Lindsay Clancy, a former labour and delivery nurse, was accused of killing the couple’s three children — Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months — in January 2023.

She attended her trial in a wheelchair after suffering permanent paralysis in the aftermath of the incident.

Patrick testified during the trial about his former wife’s mental health struggles following childbirth.

Clancy has never denied killing the children, while her defence argued that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time and was not criminally responsible for her actions.

The case ended in a mistrial after one juror refused to find Clancy not criminally responsible.

Judge William Sullivan, who presided over the trial, has since sealed the jurors’ identities, citing a “real and present” risk of harm.

The prosecution had alleged that Clancy sent Patrick on an errand before the incident, deliberately removing him from the home.

Patrick became a focus of the trial during its seventh week, when he faced allegations that he was partly responsible for the deaths of the children.

“I think I did the best I could with what I had at the time.” Patrick said. “And I live with the outcome. I live with it every day.”

Speaking about the claims and speculation surrounding him, Patrick said they were “deeply harmful to the legacy of my children” and a “huge distraction from what really matters here, which is perinatal [mental health].”

Patrick has since moved to New York City with his new wife, Rachel Danis, where they hope to find some anonymity and normality.

He said he looks forward to starting a family with his new partner and telling his future children about their siblings.

The case remains unresolved and is scheduled to return to court on September 29 at Plymouth Superior Court in Massachusetts.

(Metro UK)

Headline

Former Fox Business Producer Jennifer Eckhart Dies By Suicide

Published

6 hours ago

September 22, 2026

Editor

Jennifer Eckhart, a popular podcaster and former associate producer at Fox Business, died by suicide at her home in Hobe Sound on Saturday morning, as reported by the Martin County sheriff.

Sheriff John Budensiek explained that he typically does not comment on suicides; however, he chose to speak publicly about Eckhart’s death to address conspiracy theories suggesting that she had been murdered.

“After thoroughly investigating the scene and the circumstances, we looked at it as if it were a homicide. However, it is not. It is a suicide. Unfortunately, she took her own life,” Budensiek stated.

Eckhart gained media attention after accusing a Fox News anchor of raping her. Investigators revealed that she had family and friends who attempted to help her, but she had been in and out of mental health facilities and had stopped taking her medications.

Elizabeth Burrows, the director of development and communications with 211 Palm Beach and Treasure Coast, highlighted the tragedy of suicide and encouraged anyone struggling to seek help.

“Every death by suicide is a tragedy,” Burrows said.

She noted that anyone in crisis can call 211 or 988, which are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to provide resources or someone to talk to.

“You’d be surprised at how often just having someone who’s there to listen can help someone make it through their darkest moments,” Burrows said.

Burrows also stressed the importance of being present and asking questions when supporting someone who may be struggling.

“It’s OK to ask. Asking about it does not make suicide more of a risk for them. If anything, it lets that person know that they are not alone,” she said. “The one answer I can always give is to never give up. As long as someone is still here, there is still an opportunity to support and assist them.”

The sheriff said Eckhart’s death remains an open investigation as they await toxicology results, but he emphasized that all evidence points to suicide.