News
OPINION: Wike’s Cry And Legality Of Fubara’s Impeachment Plot

By Embassy-Oseni Momodu
Prof. David Easton’s iconic definition of politics as the authoritative allocation of values finds interpretative expression in the unfolding political drama in Rivers state. Resource control, appointment into political offices, institutional reforms, etcetera are few indicators of these values.
In Baron de Motesque’s view, he postulates that it’s dangerous to allow Monarch (executive), the House of Commons (legislaure) and Judges (judiciary) fuse power under the control of one person. He then propounded doctrine of “Separation of Power” as panacea against tyrany. Modern democracies align with this principle beyond mere philosophical and ideological postulations.
This principle is now codified as part of our laws in the constitution. Despite this constitutional proviso against fusion of power in one Arm of government, smart Presidents, Governors and Council Chairmen have skillfully balanced interests with occupiers of the other two Arms for smooth running of governance. This institutional synergy is crucial for speeding growth and development. But oftentimes, they’re loosely tagged “rubber stamps”.
I now delve into Governor Fubara’s impeachment plot by the Assembly men. One may be tempted to ask whether there’s something else they aren’t telling Nigerians. Peter Odili, Rotimi Amaechi and Nyesome Wike served two terms of 8 standard years each in the same Rivers State. They too endured challenges but still ended well without being sacked.
In war strategy, much like in politics, do not overestimate your strength and don’t underestimate your adversary however perceived inconsequential. The adversary being Wike, Fubara’s political godfather and Assembly men are now calling for Fubara sack.
The day a Governor loses confidence of his legislators is the beginning of his political uncertainty. This is because, his continued stay in office may be threatened by the Assembly, perhaps, under vague ground. A reference point of history between Alhaji Balarabe Musa and Kaduna state House of Assembly in 1981 which led to his removal by NPN. Those downplaying the impeachment aren’t doing Fubara any favor. Legislators are powerful. They own the knife.
READ ALSO:OPINION: Yakubu Mohammed: 1950 – 2026
Section 188 of the CFRN 1999 is the legal foundation for removal of Governor and Deputy Governor. The law is that whenever Governor or Deputy commits impeachable offence (s) as opined by the Rivers State House of Assembly, the holder of the office shall be impeached without delay, provided all relevant procedures and conditions precedent have been complied with strictu sesu. It’s preposterous for Fubara to preemptively assume the Assembly can do nothing. He shouldn’t have to learn the hard way again before he takes heed.
With court order obtained by Governor Fubara suggestively to halt the impeachment proceedings, Section 188 (10) has this to say: “No proceedings or determination of the Panel or of the House of Assembly or any matter relating to such proceedings or determination shall be entertained or questioned in any court”.
It’s an affront on our legal system for court to have given such order, for they are not vested powers to clog impeachment process legally commenced by the House of Assembly of a State. The Rivers state Chief Judge can’t be arm twisted to abandon his constitutional duties of constituting the Panel of Enquiry to investigate the alleged wrongdoings of the Governor.
The constitution further clarified what constitute “gross misconduct” in the following words thus: Section 188 (11)- In this section -“gross misconduct” means a grave violation or breach of the provisions of this Constitution or a misconduct of such nature as amounts in the opinion in the House of Assembly to gross misconduct.
The scope of “gross misconduct” is wide as to encompass whatever in the opinion of the legislators qualifies as such. This doesn’t mean the constitution handed them unfettered power to unseat a Governor without justifiable cause. That will amount to abuse of their office. Nevertheless, they are bound by doctrine of ‘stare decisis’ to respect the Court Order until another counter order to vacate same.
READ ALSO:OPINION: Rivers’ Landlord And His Children Of Perdition
When a Governor acts like no Assembly exists, he may be tempting them to invoke their power of oversight functions constitutionally vested to checkmate his excesses. In contrast, in Edo State, Monday Okpebholo inherited a PDP-dominated House of Assembly in November 2024 under the current Speaker, Hon. Blessing Agbebaku, who then was Governor Obaseki’s best man. Today, the House is APC dominated with an overwhelming majority courtesy of Okpebholo’s political mystery. A silent achiever.
The power tussle in Rivers with Nyesome Wike is puerile going by the antecedents which preceeded his coming to office. I’m not holding brief for the Minister but as a student of ‘school of loyalty’, undermining Wike portends significant sense of ingratitude if he may reflect. But for the House of Assembly created by an Act of the National Assembly as a sacred Arm of government, Fubara must treat it with respect as a legal obligation within the bounds of the law. Failing which constitutes gross misconduct as well.
Disloyalty in politics has consequences. Ask former Governor Akinwunmi Ambode of Lagos state. I may not be a fan of Wike but as Fubara’s benefactor, he deserved at least a modicum of regard. If it was by smartness, intellect and brevity, Fubara won’t rank the 1000th in Rivers state. But to the Glory of God, he’s the Governor. Aside him where Dakuku Peterside, Magnus Abe, Dr. Mike Nwielaghi, etcetera are capable of governing the state. He should learn to humble himself as his colleagues Oborevwori, Sanwo-Olu, Monday Okpebholo within the south south region. Should the Assembly insist on going ahead (without caution) Fubara’s fate may gravitate towards the mercy of the Assembly, in which case, only Wike and the President can save him by then. The question is- why would a Governor vacillate taking action to quench ignoble looming humiliation?.
Nyesome Wike has advanced to becoming a statesman and he should respect that status too. The power tussle between him and His Excellency Siminalaye Fubara is absolutely demeaning. Politics of betrayal is the albatross to enduring mutual trust, making their reunion a difficult task.
In Delta state, Sheriff Oborevwori is the Governor of the state, but acknowledges Mr. Ifeanyi Okowa as his leader. In Lagos state, Mr. Sanwo-Olu is Governor of the state, yet Bola Tinubu is his supreme leader. The states of Kogi, Adamawa, Borno, etcetera, etcetera are reference points to confirm this analogy. No reward for ruffling ego with your benefactor. It doesn’t always end well.
READ ALSO:OPINION: The Guest Who Ate Before The Owner
As usual, Nigerians are divided over Fubara’s perceived disloyalty against the man who brought him to the national limelight amidst allegations of overbearing influence over the Governor. Tinubu was sometimes accused of the same in Lagos when Akinwumi Ambode misbehaved. That Lagos now float over 4 trillion naira annual budget (2026 Appropriation Law) is the product of Tinubu’s visionary leadership; silencing his critics after 27 years of unbroken leadership chaine.
Loyalty is crucial in politics. It came to tacid test last year over Speakership tussle between Hon. Mudashiru Obasa and Hon. Mojisola Meranda of the Lagos Assembly. In the end, Obasa was restored as Speaker after he was earlier impeached by his colleagues and succeeded by Deputy Speaker, Meranda. Tinubu’s influence, dialogue prevailed on Meranda and other Assembly Honorables to rescind actions for Obasa’s return as Speaker, while Miranda returned to her seat as Deputy Speaker. That’s ‘loyalty’ at play, all to honor Tinubu and stability of the party. Even in military protocols, loyalty is superior is key. Emphasizing, l’m a loyal party man to my APC leaders such as Senator Adams Oshiomhole, Governor Okpebholo, Rep. Anamero Dekeri, Minister Abubakar Momoh, etcetera in Edo state.
President Bola Tinubu that l know abhors disloyalty. Ingratitude is now openly celebrated by some prominent party officials. The APC is a party founded on the notion of loyalty to party leaders and rule of law.
I respectfully submit that in the intriguing issues in Rivers state, dialogue, not rhetorics is the quickest solution to the political impass. Tinubu must intervene now. Having regards to the famous “48 Laws of Power”, Sim Fubara is failing a leadership litmus test, not good for his reputation. May our loyalty never be tested.
Embassy-Oseni Momodu, writes from Abuja, FCT Nigeria.
News
Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Tells FG To Retaliate Against South African Companies In Nigeria

Senator Adams Oshiomhole has called on the Federal Government to retaliate against South African businesses operating in Nigeria following the recent attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.
Speaking during plenary on Tuesday, Oshiomhole said the Federal Government should consider revoking the working license of South African owned companies such as MTN and DSTV.
He argued that Nigeria must respond firmly to what he described as persistent hostility against its citizens.
READ ALSO:South Africa To Investigate ‘Mystery’ Of Planeload Of Palestinians
“I am not going to shed tears. If you hit me, I hit you. I think it is appropriate in diplomacy. It is an economic struggle,” Oshiomhole said.
He argued that while some South Africans accuse Nigerians of taking their jobs, Nigerians should return home and take over employment opportunities created by major South African companies operating in the country, including MTN and DSTV.
“When we hit back, the President of South Africa will not only talk but will also go on his knees to recognise that Nigeria cannot be intimidated.
READ ALSO:South African Ambassador Found Dead Outside Paris Hotel
“We will not condone any life being lost. If a crime has been committed under the South African law they have the right to bring any such person to justice, but to kill our people as if we are helpless, we will not allow that,” Oshiomhole added.
DAILY POST reports that several Nigerians in South Africa have reportedly been attacked, and their businesses destroyed, in ongoing xenophobic attacks in the country.
News
IGP Orders Officers Display Name Tag On Uniform, Gives Update On State Police

The Inspector General of Police, IGP, Tunji Disu, has ordered all police personnel to always have their name tags on their uniforms for easy identification.
Disu disclosed that only police personnel who are undercover are exempted from displaying their name tags.
Speaking on Tuesday, Disu said: “All police officers should have their name tags. All of us on the high table have our names apart from the undercover among us so if you look at all the Commissioners of Police we have our name tags, so it’s not our standard.
READ ALSO:
“All the Commissioners of Police are here and that is why we called this meeting, we have list of things like this that we will want to discuss with the Commissioners of Police, we have told them earlier and we will still let them know that every that happens within their area of jurisdiction falls under their control.”
On the issue of state police, the IGP said: “Since we got the signal that the Federal Government of Nigeria intend to establish State Police and since we are the federal police, we decided to take the bull by the horn and put down our own side of what we believe on how the state police should be run.
“A lot of things were taken into consideration, a lot of comparative analysis was done and it has been transmitted to the National Assembly.”
News
Court Orders SERAP To Pay DSS Operatives N100m For Defamation

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has ordered a non-governmental organization, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, to pay N100 million as damaged to two operatives of the Department of the State Services, DSS, for unjustly defaming them in some publications.
The court also ordered SERAP to tender public apologies to the defamed officers,
Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, in two national newspapers, two television stations and its website.
Besides, the organization was also ordered to pay the two operatives N1 million as cost of litigation and 10 percent post-judgment interest annually on the judgment sum until it’s fully liquidated.
Justice Yusuf Halilu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory gave the order on Tuesday while delivering judgment in a N5.5 billion defamation suit instituted against SERAP by the DSS operatives.
The judge found SERAP liable for unjustly defaming the two DSS operatives with allegations that they unlawfully invaded its Abuja office, harassed and intimidated its staff, in September 2024.
READ ALSO:How We Arrested Terror Suspect Who Threatened To Kill Students, Teachers In Abuja — DSS
In the offending publication on its website and Twitter handle, SERAP alleged that the two operatives unlawfully invaded and occupied its office with sinister motives.
The judge held that the publication was in bad taste especially from an organization established to promote transparency and accountability, as nothing in the publication was found to be truthful.
The DSS staff had listed SERAP as 1st defendant in the suit marked CV/4547/2024. SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, was listed as the 2nd defendant.
In the suit, the claimants – Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele – accused the two defendants of making false claims that they invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024..
Counsel to the DSS, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, had while adopting his final address in the mater urged the judge to grant all the reliefs sought by his client in the interest of justice.
READ ALSO:DSS Arrests Suspected Gunrunner, Recovers 832 Rounds Of Ammunition
He admitted that although the names of the two claimants were not mentioned in the defamation materials, they had however established substantial circumstances that they are the ones referred to in the published defamation article by SERAP on its website.
The counsel submitted that all ingredients of defamation have been clearly established and the offending publication referred to the two officials of the secret police.
However, SERAP, through its counsel, Victoria Bassey from Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, law firm, asked the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the two claimants did not establish that they were the ones referred to in the alleged defamation materials.
She said that SERAP used “DSS officials” in the alleged offending publication, adding that the two claimants must establish that they are the ones referred to before their case can succeed.
Similar arguments were canvassed by Oluwatosin Adefioye who stood for the second defendant, adding that there was no dispute in the September 9, 2024 operation of DSS in SERAP’s office.
READ ALSO:Alleged Cyberstalking: DSS Plays Video Evidence In Sowore’s Trial
He said that since SERAP in the publication did not name any particular person, the claimants must plead special circumstances that they were the ones referred to as the DSS officials.
Besides, he said that there is no organization by name Department of State Services in law, hence, DSS cannot claim being defamed adding that the only entity known to law is National Security Agency.
The claimants had in the suit stated that the alleged false claim by SERAP has negatively impacted on their reputation.
The DSS also stated, in the statement of claim, that, in line with the agency’s practice of engaging with officials of non-governmental organisations operating in the FCT to establish a relationship with their new leadership, it directed the two officials – John and Ogunleye – to visit SERAP’s office and invite them for a familiarization meeting.
The claimants added that in carrying out the directive, John and Ogunleye paid a friendly visit to SERAP’s office at 18 Bamako Street, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja on September 9 and met with one Ruth, who upon being informed about the purpose of the visit, claimed that none of SERAP’s management staff was in the country and advised that a formal letter of invitation be written by the DSS.
READ ALSO:DSS, Police Partner NCCSALW To End Terrorism, Mop Up Illegal Arms
John and Ogundele, who claimed that their interactions with Ruth were recorded, said before they immediately exited SERAP’s office, Ruth promised to inform her organisation’s management about the visit and volunteered a phone number – 08160537202.
They said it was surprising that, shortly after their visit, SERAP posted on its X (Twitter) handle – @SERAPNigeria – that officers of the DSS are presently unlawfully occupying its office.
The claimant added, “On the same day, the defendants also published a statement on SERAP’s website, which was widely reported by several media outfits, falsely alleging that some officers from the DSS, described as “a tall, large, dark-skinned woman” and “a slim, dark skinned man,” invaded their Abuja office and interrogated the staff of the first defendant (SERAP).
John and Ogundele stated that “due to the false statements published by the defendants, the DSS has been ridiculed and criticised by international agencies such as the Amnesty International and prominent members of the Nigerian society, such as Femi Falana (SAN)”.
“Due to the false statements published by the defendants, members of the public and the international community formed the opinion that the Federal Government is using the DSS to harass the defendants.”
READ ALSO:SERAP To Court: Stop CBN From ‘Implementing ‘Unlawful, Unjust ATM Fee Hike’
They added that the defendants’ statements caused harm to their reputation because the staff and management of the DSS have formed the opinion that the claimants did not follow orders and carried out an unsanctioned operation and are therefore, incompetent and unprofessional.
The claimants therefore prayed the court for the following reliefs: “An order directing the defendants to tender an apology to the claimants via the first defendant’s (SERAP’s) website, X (twitter) handle, two national daily newspapers (Punch and Vanguard) and two national news television stations (Arise Television and Channels Television) for falsely accusing the claimants of unlawfully invading the first defendant’s office and interrogating the first defendant’s staff.
“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N5 billion as damages for the libellous statements published about the claimants.
“Interest on the sum of N5b at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the date of judgment until the judgment sum is realised or liquidated.
“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N50 million as costs of this action.”
Politics3 days ago2027: Tinubu’s Re-election May Put An End To Nigeria — Baba Ahmed Warns
Metro4 days agoI’m A Street Girl’ – Bimbo Ademoye Clashes With Area Boys [VIDEO]
News5 days agoVIDEO: Moment S’Court Recognises David Mark-led ADC Leadership
Politics4 days agoSenatorial Seat: Ogbakha-Edo Warns Against Imposition Of Candidates In Edo South
Politics4 days agoBREAKING: 2027: Former Adamawa APC Guber Candidate, Aishatu Binani Defects To NDC
Business3 days agoJUST IN: Nigerian Filling Stations Reduce Fuel Price After Hike
Entertainment4 days agoActress Eniola Badmus Gets New Federal Appointment
Metro5 days agoRobbers Raid Imo Catholic Church, Steal Holy Communion Materials
News4 days ago10 African Countries With Highest Petrol Prices In Prices In April 2026
Metro5 days agoVIDEO: Policemen Filmed Assaulting Individual In Viral Clip














