The Socio-economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC), seeking to halt and reverse a proposed salary increase for Nigeria’s political elite.

The suit, filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja, is challenging the legality and morality of the commission’s proposal, arguing that it is unconstitutional and insensitive to the country’s dire economic realities.

The legal action comes in the wake of RMAFC’s recent announcement that it intends to review upward the salaries of the president, vice-president, governors, their deputies, and lawmakers.

The commission had justified the proposed hike by claiming the current emoluments are paltry, a statement that has drawn widespread criticism from the public.

SERAP’s lawsuit, designated FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, aims to get a court determination on whether such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law.

READ ALSO:‘Missing N6trn’: SERAP Drags FG To ECOWAS Court Over Unpublished NDDC Audit

The human rights advocacy group is not only seeking a declaration that the proposed salary increase is illegal, but also asking the court to issue a restraining order to prevent RMAFC from taking further steps to implement the pay rise.

Furthermore, SERAP is seeking an order directing the commission to review downward the salaries and allowances of these political office holders to better reflect the nation’s economic state.

In its suit, filed by Kolawole Oluwadare, Ms. Oluwakemi Oni, and Andrew Nwankwo, the human rights organisation contends that restraining the commission from arbitrarily increasing these salaries serves a legitimate public interest.

It argued that while the RMAFC has a constitutional mandate to set salaries, this power is not unrestrained or unbridled.

According to SERAP, the proposed salary increase constitutes a gross misuse of the commission’s constitutional and statutory mandates and is a violation of the legal doctrine of reasonableness.

READ ALSO:SERAP Sues NNPCL Over Alleged Failure To Account For Missing N825bn, $2.5bn

The lawsuit references a 2021 judgment by Justice Chuka Austine Obiozor of the Federal High Court, Lagos, which had previously ordered RMAFC to review downward and fix the salaries and allowances of members of the National Assembly.

That judgment followed a consolidated suit brought by a coalition of civil society organisations, including SERAP, BudgIT, and Enough is Enough Nigeria (EiE), along with concerned citizens.

SERAP’s suit also draws on fundamental constitutional principles, particularly those outlined in Chapter 2 of the Nigerian Constitution, which deals with the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy.

The organisation argued that the proposed pay rise is a gross violation of these principles and the country’s international human rights obligations.

The lawsuit asserted that the combined provisions of Chapters 2 and 4, which focus on fundamental rights, give substance to the socio-economic rights of Nigerians and their right to equality and non-discrimination.

READ ALSO:‘Missing N6trn’: SERAP Drags FG To ECOWAS Court Over Unpublished NDDC Audit

A central pillar of SERAP’s argument is the stark contrast between the proposed pay increase and the grim economic realities faced by the majority of Nigerians.

The legal action pointed out that over 133 million Nigerians are currently living in poverty, adding that several state governments are struggling to pay workers’ salaries and pensions, making an upward review of political salaries particularly insensitive and unjustifiable.

The lawsuit stated further, “RMAFC cannot legitimately or justifiably increase the salaries of the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers at a time when over 133 million Nigerians are poor.”

SERAP posited that the RMAFC appears to consistently prioritise the interests of political office holders over those of poor and vulnerable Nigerians.

The organisation maintained that the commission, in exercising its mandates, ought to balance the interests of the marginalised against the interests of the political class.

READ ALSO:SERAP Drags Tinubu To Court Over Fubara, Deputy, Lawmakers’ Suspension

The lawsuit also advocated for prioritising cuts to the excessive allowances and life pensions for former political office holders, arguing that the principle of representative democracy, fairness, and equality is undermined when the living standards of millions of citizens plummet while political leaders enjoy arbitrary salary increases.

Furthermore, the suit painted a picture of the deteriorating public services in Nigeria, noting that access to essential services like pipe-borne water, affordable healthcare, and reliable electricity remains a dream for many, even as these services are becoming more ubiquitous and cheap globally.

This backdrop, according to SERAP, makes the proposed pay hike a morally reprehensible act and a betrayal of public trust.

It would be recalled that the RMAFC Chairman, Mohammed Bello, had stated on August 18, 2025, that the commission’s proposal for a pay rise was based on the seriously flawed ground that the salaries were paltry.

He claimed the review package was fair, realistic, and sustainable and aligned with the country’s current socio-economic realities.

He also noted that the last major overhaul of the allocation formula was in 1992, with only executive adjustments since 2002.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the case.