Connect with us

Headline

US Congressman Makes Shocking Revelation, Reveals How USAID Funded Boko Haram, Other Terror Groups

Published

on

US Congressman, Scott Perry, has said that US aid agency, United States Agency for International Development, funded terrorist organisations, including Boko Haram.

Perry, a Republican representing Pennsylvania, made the claim during the inaugural hearing of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency on Thursday.

Advertisement

The session, titled “The War on Waste: Stamping Out the Scourge of Improper Payments and Fraud,” focused on alleged misappropriations of taxpayer funds.

Who gets some of that money? Does that name ring a bell to anybody in the room? Because your money, your money, $697 million annually, plus the shipments of cash funds in Madrasas, ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorasan, terrorist training camps. That’s what it’s funding,” Perry said.

According to the subcommittee’s website, it will “actively work with President Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency to root out waste, shore up vulnerable payment systems, and fully investigate schemes to defraud taxpayers.”

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Musk Brands USAID As ‘Criminal Organization’ Amid Row

Perry further cited USAID’s reported funding of $136 million for building 120 schools in Pakistan, alleging that there was “zero evidence” of the schools’ construction.

Perry added, “If you think that the programme under Operation Enduring Sentinel entitled Women’s Scholarship Endowment, which receives $60 million annually, or the Young Women Lead, which gets about $5 million annually, is going to women who, by the way, if you read the Inspector General’s report, is telling you that the Taliban does not
allow women to speak in public, yet somehow you’re believing, and American people are supposed to believe, that this money is going for the betterment of the women in Afghanistan. It is not.

Advertisement

“You are funding terrorism, and it’s coming through USAID. And it’s not just Afghanistan, because Pakistan’s right next door.

“USAID spent $840 million in the last year, the last 20 years, on Pakistan’s education-related programme. It includes $136 million to build 120 schools, of which there is zero evidence that any of them were built. Why would there be any evidence? The Inspector General can’t get in to see them.

READ ALSO: USAID: He Should Be Fired Immediately — Trump Blasts Washington Post Columnist

Advertisement

“But you know what? We doubled down and spent $20 million from USAID to create educational television programs for children unable to attend the physical school. Yeah, they can’t attend it, because it doesn’t exist. You paid for it.

“Somebody else got the money. You are paying for terrorism. This has got to end.”

US President Donald Trump has previously called for the closure of USAID, accusing the agency of corruption in a post on his Truth Social platform.

Advertisement

The move is part of Trump’s–and his billionaire ally Elon Musk’s–drive to shrink the US government.

READ ALSO: USAID Staff To Work From Home As Musk Pushes To Shut Down Agency

Musk, whom Trump appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, has also criticised USAID, alleging that it engages in rogue operations.

Advertisement

Musk has called USAID “a viper’s nest of radical-left Marxists who hate America” and has vowed to shut it down.

Among other criticisms, which Musk has claimed that USAID does “rogue CIA work” and even “funded bioweapon research, including COVID-19, that killed millions of people.”

Trump said DOGE would “dismantle government bureaucracy, slash excessive regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure federal agencies — essential to the ‘Save America’ movement. This will send shockwaves through the system, and anyone involved in government waste, which is a lot of people!”

Advertisement

Headline

Russia Returns Bodies Of 1,000 Ukrainian Soldiers

Published

on

By

Russia on Tuesday returned the bodies of what it said were 1,000 Ukrainian soldiers, five of whom died while in captivity, a Ukrainian government agency said.

Ukraine returned the bodies of 19 Russian soldiers in exchange, a Russian official said.

Advertisement

Tens of thousands of soldiers have been killed on both sides since Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022, though neither side regularly publishes data on their own casualties.

The exchange of prisoners of war and repatriation of war dead has been one of the few areas of cooperation between the two countries since the war began.

READ ALSO: Russia, Ukraine War: Trump Rules Out Immediate Ceasefire, Pushes For Peace Deal

Advertisement

The two sides have intensified these efforts in recent months during talks in Istanbul.

According to the Russian side, 1,000 bodies belonging to Ukrainian military personnel have been returned to Ukraine,” Ukraine’s Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said in a statement on Telegram.

Unfortunately, among those repatriated are the bodies of five Ukrainian servicemen who died in captivity,” it added.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Russia, Ukraine War: Trump Rules Out Immediate Ceasefire, Pushes For Peace Deal

It said law enforcement would begin the process of identifying the soldiers.

The exchange was carried out by agreements reached between the two sides in Istanbul, Russian negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said.

Advertisement

Kyiv initially said the two had agreed to “exchange” the bodies of 6,000 Ukrainian soldiers for as many Russians, though Moscow has always presented the deal as a unilateral decision to repatriate Ukrainians.

AFP

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Headline

Russian Politicians Mock European Leaders After White House, Ukraine Talks

Published

on

By

Russian politicians have ridiculed European leaders following the White House meeting on the Ukraine war.

Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev called it “anti-Russian warmongering Coalition of the Willing” and ineffective.

Advertisement

He claimed that they thanked and sucked up to U.S. President Donald Trump but failed to outplay him.

In his post on X on Monday, Medvedev also mocked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, questioning how the “clown from Kiev” would act once he was back home and wearing his military uniform.

READ ALSO:US Diverted 20,000 Anti-drone Missiles From Ukraine To Middle East -Zelensky

Advertisement

The talks in Washington involved Trump, Zelensky, and top European officials, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron.

Others are: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.

The European leaders discussed a peace process and stressed that Ukraine must receive strong security guarantees.

Advertisement

Trump suggested a rapid follow-up meeting between Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, which could then pave the way to a meeting that would also include him.

READ ALSO:753 Duplexes: Abuja Court Admits Emefiele To N2bn Bail

Russian foreign policy expert Konstantin Kosachev said on Telegram that, under pressure from Trump, Ukraine and the Europeans had to moderate their anti-Russian stance.

Advertisement

Times have changed. Neither Kiev nor Brussels can bark at Russia hidden behind the American back,” wrote the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the Russian Federation Council.

One consistent message was opposition to European capitals being involved in peace negotiations.

Leonid Slutsky, head of the Russian State Duma’s foreign affairs committee, said: “Europe should follow Vladimir Putin’s call and not interfere in the negotiation process.”

Advertisement

(dpa/NAN)

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Headline

Google Fined $36m In Australia Over Anticompetitive Search Deals

Published

on

By

Google has agreed to pay a fine of 55 million Australian dollars (US$36 million) after admitting to anticompetitive agreements with the country’s two largest telecommunications firms, Telstra and Optus.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission announced the penalty on Monday in a statement obtained from its website , saying the arrangements between the tech giant and the two telcos reduced search competition and consumer choice in Australia.

Advertisement

According to the ACCC, Google’s Singapore-based Asia Pacific division entered into contracts with Telstra and Optus between late 2019 and early 2021.

Under the agreements, the telcos were banned from installing rival search engines on Android smartphones sold to customers.

READ ALSO:US Envoy, Minister Address Visa Policy Changes, Urge Compliance

Advertisement

The deals, which ran for about 15 months until March 2021, ensured that Google Search was the sole pre-installed option on Android devices. In return, Telstra and Optus received a share of advertising revenue generated from users’ searches.

The regulator said Google had accepted that the agreements were likely to “substantially lessen competition.”

Proceedings have been launched in the Federal Court, which will decide whether the AU$55 million penalty is appropriate.

Advertisement

In addition to the fine, Google has signed a court-enforceable undertaking requiring it to remove restrictions on pre-installation and default search engine options from future contracts with Android phone manufacturers and telecommunications operators.

READ ALSO:Google Drops Pledge Not To Use AI For Weapons

ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb welcomed the outcome, stressing that anti-competitive conduct directly harms consumers.

Advertisement

“Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it ully means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers.

“Today’s outcome, along with Telstra, Optus and TPG’s undertakings, have created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers,” she said.

Cass-Gottlieb also noted that the changes come at a critical time. “Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition,” she said.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Google Shares Slide On Spending Plans Despite Sales Jump

Under the new arrangements, Telstra, Optus and TPG are allowed to configure search services on a device-by-device basis, even in ways that may not align with Google’s default settings.

The telcos may also enter into pre-installation agreements with other search providers.

Advertisement

With AI search tools becoming increasingly available, consumers can experiment with search services on their mobiles,” Cass-Gottlieb said.

The case follows a lengthy ACCC investigation, which began after concerns were raised during the regulator’s Digital Platform Services Inquiry into search defaults and choice screens.

READ ALSO:Google Doodle Celebrates Mexican Archaeologist On 128th Birthday

Advertisement

“Co-operation with the ACCC is encouraged.

“It can avoid the need for protracted and costly litigation and lead to more competition.

“More competition in markets drives economic dynamism, but the reverse is true when markets are not sufficiently competitive,” Cass-Gottlieb said.

Advertisement

She said ACCC remains committed to addressing anti-competitive conduct like this, as well as cartel conduct.

Last year, Telstra, Optus, and rival TPG agreed to court-enforceable undertakings with the ACCC, pledging not to renew or enter into similar arrangements with Google that would limit search engine options.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version