Connect with us

Headline

US Election: Why Young Men Supported Donald Trump

Published

on

Focusing her campaign on abortion rights, Kamala Harris believed she had found a winning strategy to attract women voters.

But it was Donald Trump who claimed victory, increasing his support among American men — particularly young men.

While young people generally tend to lean more liberal, Trump’s presidential campaign effectively capitalised on youth masculinity, tapping into interests such as combat sports and cryptocurrency, and appearing on male-dominated podcasts.

Advertisement

“If you are a man in this country and you don’t vote for Donald Trump, you’re not a man,” said Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist focused on the youth vote.

Trump won the presidency with 54 per cent of men voting Republican, a slight increase from the 51 percent who supported him in 2020, according to exit polling by NBC.

However, what was particularly notable was the support from younger voters aged 18–29, with 49 percent of young men voting for Trump — challenging previous assumptions that young people generally lean left.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Democrats Blame Biden, Campaign Strategy, Others For Harris’ Defeat To Trump

As Elon Musk — tech entrepreneur, billionaire, and major Trump supporter — put it on Election Day: “the cavalry has arrived.”

Trump’s gains reflect a growing gender divide among young voters: women under 29 overwhelmingly favoured Harris, with a 61-37 split over Trump.

Advertisement

“There is a lot of latent sexism in the US electorate, both among men and women,” Tammy Vigil, an associate professor of media science at Boston University, told AFP. “Trump’s campaign allowed people to indulge their worst impulses and embrace divisiveness of many kinds.”

‘Tough’ Trump Seen as a ‘Leader’

Spencer Thomas, a Harris supporter, noted that many of his peers who voted for Trump were focused on the economy.

Advertisement

They were more concerned with economic policies and similar issues than abortion rights,” said the Howard University student, attending a historically Black college in Washington.

READ ALSO: Kidnapped Catholic Priest In Edo Released In Kogi Catholic

The macho tone of Trump’s campaign — rejecting political correctness, “wokeness,” and other forms of liberal caution — attracted many Black men, despite the campaign’s overt racism at times.

Advertisement

Among Black men under 45, roughly three in ten voted for Trump — double the rate from 2020, further eroding the Democrats’ traditional base.

As Democrats analyse what went wrong, there will be no simple explanation.

But “Black and Latino men might overlook the racism of the Trump campaign because Trump appealed to their sense of machismo,” Vigil suggested.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Trump Makes First Cabinet Pick, Eyes Putin Talks

Trump’s appearance on the “Joe Rogan Experience” podcast, with an audience that skews young and male, “was aimed at motivating young men to turn out,” said Kathleen Dolan, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

“His overall display of masculinity was designed to appeal to his base — men and women who like him because they see him as ‘tough’ and a ‘leader,’ and who clearly aren’t offended by his comments,” she told AFP.
Whatever Trump’s unique appeal was, it resonated with voters.

Advertisement

According to exit polling from Edison Research, some 54 per cent of Latino men voted for Trump on Tuesday — an extraordinary 18-point gain for Republicans compared to 2020.

AFP

Advertisement

Headline

US Revokes Visas Of Foreigners Who Mocked Kirk’s Assassination

Published

on

The United States has revoked the visas of several foreign nationals who publicly mocked or celebrated the killing of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk, officials confirmed on Tuesday.

The State Department said the decision followed an internal review of social media posts deemed “offensive and contrary to U.S. values,” adding that the country “has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans.”

Kirk, 31, co-founder of the conservative youth group Turning Point USA and a strong ally of former President Donald Trump, was shot dead during a political rally on 10 September.

Advertisement

His killing drew widespread condemnation across the political spectrum, with many describing the act as a targeted attack on free speech.

READ ALSO:Police Bust Child Trafficking Syndicate In Rivers, Rescue Babies

According to U.S. authorities, at least six individuals from Argentina, South Africa, Brazil, Paraguay, Mexico, and Germany had their visas revoked after making comments online that celebrated Kirk’s murder or insulted his supporters.

Advertisement

Examples cited by officials included posts calling Kirk a racist who deserved it, and messages mocking grieving Americans.

We will not tolerate foreigners who promote or celebrate acts of violence against U.S. citizens,” a State Department spokesperson said.

The move underscores Washington’s growing use of immigration powers to respond to online behaviour perceived as threatening or disrespectful towards the country.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:How A Nigerian Student’s Bold Hustle Landed Him In Silicon Valley

The Department said it continues to monitor social media content for evidence of incitement or endorsement of violence.
Civil liberties advocates, however, have questioned the decision, arguing that revoking visas for social media comments could set a worrying precedent.

Officials maintained that the visa cancellations were lawful, limited in scope, and aimed at protecting national integrity.

Advertisement

Freedom of speech does not extend to foreigners seeking the privilege of entry while glorifying violence,” the spokesperson added.

The United States has increased visa scrutiny in recent years, requiring applicants to disclose social media handles and online activity.

The policy, officials say, is designed to prevent extremist sympathisers or those expressing hostility towards the country from entering its borders

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Headline

Israeli PM Netanyahu Back In Court For Graft Trial

Published

on

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was back in a Tel Aviv court on Wednesday for the latest hearing in his long-running corruption trial, which opened in May 2020.

The prime minister kept a smiling face as he and his entourage of several ministers from his conservative Likud party were heckled by protesters en route to the tribunal.

It comes after US President Donald Trump suggested on Monday that the Israeli premier should be pardoned in his three separate corruption cases.

Advertisement

His latest appearance at the Tel Aviv court also follows the return of the hostages taken by Hamas as part of Trump’s US-brokered plan to end the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

READ ALSO:Why I Won’t Attend Gaza Summit In Egypt — Netanyahu

In one case, Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, are accused of accepting more than $260,000 worth of luxury goods, including champagne, cigars and jewellery, from billionaires in exchange for political favours.

Advertisement

In two other instances, Netanyahu is also charged with attempting to negotiate better press coverage from two Israeli media outlets. He has denied any wrongdoing, claiming to be the victim of a political plot.

During his current term, which started in late 2022, Netanyahu has proposed far-reaching judicial reforms that critics say sought to weaken the courts.

Those prompted massive protests that only abated after the onset of the Gaza war, sparked by Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Friends Host Varsity Don, Afejuku To A Retirement Party In Sapele

In an address on Monday to the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, Trump told the chamber that Netanyahu should receive a pardon in the graft cases.

“Cigars and champagne, who the hell cares about that?” Trump joked, before asking his Israeli counterpart Isaac Herzog: “Why don’t you give him a pardon?”

Advertisement

The Israeli premier is also subject to an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) on suspicion of ordering war crimes in his government’s assault on Hamas militants in Gaza.

Netanyahu holds the record for the most years spent at the head of Israel’s government, having served 18 years in several stints as premier since 1996.

AFP

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Headline

FULL LIST: US Set To Carry Out Four Executions This Week

Published

on

A Florida man convicted of murdering two women he hired for sex was put to death by lethal injection on Tuesday, one of four executions to be carried out in the United States this week.

Samuel Smithers, 72, was sentenced to death in 1999 for the 1996 killings of Christy Cowan and Denise Roach in Tampa. They had been beaten and strangled and their bodies were found in a pond.

Smithers was executed at a Florida state prison at 6:15 pm (2215 GMT), the 14th execution in the southern state this year.

Advertisement

Another convicted murderer was also put to death by lethal injection in the midwestern state of Missouri on Tuesday.

READ ALSO:Police Bust Child Trafficking Syndicate In Rivers, Rescue Babies

The execution of Lance Shockley, 48, was carried out at 6:13 pm (2313 GMT) for the 2005 murder of a police sergeant, Carl Graham.

Advertisement

Graham was gunned down in an ambush at his home. The officer had been investigating a fatal car accident involving Shockley at the time.

Shockley maintained his innocence but his appeals were rejected by numerous courts, including the Supreme Court. Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe rejected his clemency request on Monday.

Two other executions are scheduled this week.

Advertisement

Charles Crawford, 59, is to be put to death by lethal injection in Mississippi on Wednesday for the 1994 rape and murder of Kristy Ray, a 20-year-old college student.

READ ALSO:China’s Trade Surges Despite US Tariff Threats

Richard Djerf, 55, is to be executed by lethal injection in Arizona on Friday for the brutal 1993 murders of four members of a Phoenix family.

Advertisement

In a letter last month apologizing for the crime, Djerf said he was ready to die and would not seek clemency.

“If I can’t find reason to spare my life, what reason would anyone else have?” he wrote.

There have been 37 executions in the United States this year, the most since 2013, when 39 inmates were put to death.

Advertisement

Florida has carried out the most executions with 14, followed by Texas with five and South Carolina and Alabama with four.

READ ALSO:Tinubu Appoints New Heads For Key Agencies

Thirty-one of this year’s executions have been carried out by lethal injection, two by firing squad and four by nitrogen hypoxia, which involves pumping nitrogen gas into a face mask, causing the prisoner to suffocate.

Advertisement

The use of nitrogen gas as a method of capital punishment has been denounced by United Nations experts as cruel and inhumane.

The death penalty has been abolished in 23 of the 50 US states, while three others — California, Oregon and Pennsylvania — have moratoriums in place.

President Donald Trump is a proponent of capital punishment and, on his first day in office, called for an expansion of its use “for the vilest crimes.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending