…Relocate office of Presidential Advisory Committee on Prerogative

After backlash for granting a presidential pardon to Maryam Sanda, sentenced to death in 2020 for the killing of her husband, Bilyaminu Bello, President Bola Tinubu has revoked the pardon and reversed her sentence to 12 years.

This was revealed in an official gazette released by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, on Wednesday.

According to the gazette, Sanda, who had already spent six years and eight months at the Suleja Medium Security Custodial Centre, will now spend approximately six additional years in jail after getting an approved term on compassionate grounds.

It read, “Maryam Sanda, whose offence was culpable homicide, sentenced on 27/01/2020 with death by hanging, has served six years and eight months at the Medium Security Custodial Centre (MSCC), Suleja will now serve 12 years based on compassionate grounds, in the best interest of the children and good conduct, embraced a new lifestyle, model prisoner and remorsefulness.”

READ ALSO:FULL LIST: 175 Beneficiaries Of Tinubu’s Pardons

In the gazette titled “reduced terms”, the explanatory note stressed that the beneficiaries whose names were listed therein were in pursuance of section 175 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

The beneficiaries included 37-year-old Sanda, Harunah Isah (35), Mamman Ibrahim (50), Sanusi Adamu (28), Sadi Musa 20, Sabiyu Aliyu, Halliru Sani (18), and 79 others.

Corroborating the gazette in a press statement, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) said the presidential pardon earlier released that granted Sanda and others clemency has been reviewed following consultations with the Council of State.

Fagbemi added that the President received concerns on the recommended list and consequently initiated a due process review.

The statement partly read, “It is to be recalled that following consultations with the Council of State, the President received concerns on the recommended list and consequently initiated a due process review. This exercise has been completed and approved by the President. This exercise was to ensure that only persons who met stipulated legal and procedural requirements would benefit from the prerogative of mercy.

READ ALSO:JUST IN: Tinubu’s Minister Resigns Amid Allegations

“During this final review, few persons earlier recommended were found not to have met the necessary requirements and were accordingly delisted, while in some other cases, sentences were reviewed and reduced to reflect fairness, justice, and the spirit of the exercise.

“This exercise underscores the President’s desire to balance justice with compassion and the belief that justice must not only punish, but also reform and redeem. The review was undertaken with meticulous commitment to due process to reinforce the administration’s broader commitment to justice reform and humane correctional practices in line with international standards.”

The Minister of Justice further said that President Tinubu has directed the immediate relocation of the Secretariat of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Prerogative of Mercy from the Federal Ministry of Special Duties to the Federal Ministry of Justice.

“To ensure that future exercises meet public expectations and best practices, the President has directed the immediate relocation of the Secretariat of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Prerogative of Mercy from the Federal Ministry of Special Duties to the Federal Ministry of Justice.

“The President has further directed the Attorney-General of the Federation to issue appropriate Guidelines for the Exercise of the Power of Prerogative of Mercy, which includes compulsory consultation with relevant prosecuting agencies.

READ ALSO:Tinubu Grants Presidential Pardon To Herbert Macaulay, 174 Others

“This will ensure that only persons who fully meet the stipulated legal and procedural requirements will henceforth benefit from the issuance of instruments of release,” the statement added.

The PUNCH reports that Tinubu granted Sanda a pardon because her family pleaded for her release, arguing that it was in the best interest of her two children.

The pardon was part of a larger decision to grant clemency to 175 Nigerians and foreigners, including notable figures such as the late environmental activist Ken Saro-Wiwa, Major General Mamman Vatsa, and other members of the “Ogoni Nine”.

However, the pardon was greeted by a backlash from opposition parties and political figures, including the African Democratic Congress and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who condemned Tinubu’s decision to grant presidential pardons to dozens of convicted criminals, including drug traffickers, describing the move as a grave setback to Nigeria’s anti-drug campaign and a dangerous affront to justice and morality.

(PUNCH)

The House of Representatives on Wednesday approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to secure a total of $2.347bn from the international capital market to part-finance the 2025 budget deficit and refinance maturing Eurobonds.

The approval followed the consideration and adoption of a report presented by the House Committee on Aids, Loans, and Debt Management, chaired by Hon. Abubakar Hassan Nalaraba, during plenary presided over by Speaker Tajudeen Abbas.

Since assuming office in May 2023, President Bola Tinubu’s administration has secured substantial external financing to support government programmes and fiscal operations.

Between May 2023 and May 2025, Nigeria obtained approximately $7.2bn in external loans from the World Bank, aimed at bolstering key economic reforms and development initiatives. In addition, the government received approval for a $1 billion facility from the African Development Bank, expected to be disbursed between 2024 and 2025.

READ ALSO:Reps Move To Regulate Cryptocurrency, POS Operations

Further strengthening its external financing portfolio, the House of Representatives in October 2025 approved a new borrowing plan, including $1.23bn to part-finance the 2025 budget and a $500m debut Sovereign Sukuk to be issued in the international capital market.

These financing initiatives form part of the administration’s broader strategy to bridge budget deficits, refinance maturing debts, and stimulate economic growth through targeted investments.

According to the committee’s report, “The new borrowing plan comprises $1.23bn to fund the 2025 budget deficit and $1.12bn to refinance Nigeria’s Eurobond maturing in November 2025.”

The Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, who presided over the Committee on Supply where the report was considered, put the request before the House at plenary.

READ ALSO:Reps Move To Regulate Cryptocurrency, POS Operations

“The Committee on Supply considered the request of Mr President and made these recommendations. Do we accept these recommendations,” he asked, to which members replied in the affirmative.

Adopting the recommendations of the committee, the House authorised the Federal Government to “Implement the external borrowing component of the 2025 Appropriation Act amounting to ₦1.84tn (approximately $1.23bn) at the budget exchange rate of ₦1,500 to $1.”

Lawmakers also approved for the government to access the loans through Eurobond issuance, loan syndication, bridge financing facilities, or direct borrowing from international financial institutions.

In addition, the House endorsed President Tinubu’s proposal to issue Nigeria’s first-ever Sovereign Sukuk bond of up to $500m in the international capital market, with or without a credit guarantee.

Recall that President Tinubu, in his earlier correspondence to the National Assembly, explained that the borrowing plan was necessary to bridge the gap between projected revenue and expenditure in the 2025 fiscal year and to enable the government to meet its debt obligations as they fall due.

A tense encounter unfolded at the National Assembly on Wednesday as officials of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board walked out of a session convened by the House of Representatives Committee on Basic Education and Examination Bodies.

The Committee, led by Bayelsa lawmaker, Oboku Oforji, had summoned the examination body to account for its 2023–2024 budget performance, internally generated revenue remittances, and other financial operations, including bank statements and evidence of transfers to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

In Nigeria, it is not uncommon for public agencies to ignore invitations from National Assembly committees, a development that often leads to conflicts between the legislature and executive branches. This pattern of non-compliance undermines the parliament’s oversight role, weakens accountability, and signals a troubling disregard for the legislature’s constitutional authority.

Often, agency heads treat summonses as optional, behaving as if they are not answerable to lawmakers. Many appear to rely on political connections or affiliations with the ruling party, assuming that little will be done if they fail to comply.

READ ALSO:Reps Raise The Alarm Over Terrorists’ Threat To Bomb N’Assembly Complex

Executive officials sometimes push back, arguing that repeated or seemingly unnecessary summonses disrupt their work.

A common workaround is for agency heads to send junior representatives in their place. However, lawmakers frequently reject this, insisting on direct engagement with the leaders themselves to ensure transparency and accountability.

Ultimately, these recurring clashes highlight a broader struggle: balancing the legislature’s constitutional duty to oversee public institutions with the practical challenges faced by agencies and private-sector actors.

At the hearing on Wednesday, the Committee noted that JAMB was formally invited in three separate letters dated October 6, 17, and 23, 2025, requesting the personal appearance of Registrar Prof Ishaq Oloyede and submission of the relevant documents. Instead of attending in person, Prof. Oloyede sent a representative, Director Mufutau Bello.

READ ALSO:Reps To Probe Edo, Delta Communal Crisis

Tension escalated when Bello demanded that National Assembly-accredited journalists leave the room, arguing that the documents contained sensitive financial information. The lawmakers refused, stating that the proceedings were public and that the Committee, not JAMB, had the authority to set the terms of the session.

Agitated by the insistence, Bello ordered his team to exit, leaving the lawmakers shocked. The Committee immediately instructed the Sergeant-at-Arms to detain the JAMB officials, only to find that they had already left the premises.

Describing the walkout as “Unacceptable and disrespectful,” Oforji emphasised that the Committee’s mandate is to ensure transparency and accountability, not to embarrass any agency.

“We sent three formal requests to the Registrar. Instead of complying, he sent a representative who accused us of trying to embarrass JAMB. That is unfortunate and cannot be tolerated,” he said.

READ ALSO:Reps Raise The Alarm Over Terrorists’ Threat To Bomb N’Assembly Complex

Consequently, the Committee gave Prof Oloyede until Tuesday, November 4, 2025, to appear in person with his management team and provide all requested documents. Failure to comply, the Committee warned, could trigger enforcement actions under Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

Several lawmakers condemned JAMB’s action as a contemptuous disregard for parliamentary oversight.

Abiante said the walkout demonstrated a troubling lack of accountability.

“Oversight is not a favour; it is a constitutional responsibility. If JAMB can ignore the National Assembly, it raises serious concerns about how public funds are managed,” Abiante said, alluding wryly to past controversies involving missing public money.

READ ALSO:Start A Small Business In These 7 Steps

On his part, Rodney Ambaiowei criticised the agency’s attempt to exclude the press, stressing that the public has a right to know how government funds are spent.

“No agency can dictate how parliament operates. Transparency is not optional when it comes to public resources,” he said.

Also speaking, Rivers lawmaker, Marie Ebikake, expressed surprise that the Registrar did not attend the hearing, noting that the identity of the representative was unclear.

“We do not even know who led the delegation. The Registrar must appear on Tuesday to clarify JAMB’s management of public funds,” she said.

The Committee adjourned the session until next Tuesday, warning that any further defiance by the examination body would invite strict parliamentary sanctions.