Connect with us

News

World Seed Day: Withdraw From UPOV, Groups Urge Nigerian Govt

Published

on

By Joseph Ebi Kanjo

Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) and Environmental Rights Action, have called on the Federal Government to withdraw from the International Union for the Protection of New Plant varieties (UPOV 1991), arguing that the Law, which is line with the UPOV’s provisions, undermines traditional agricultural practices and threatens farmers rights and freedom by opening the door for corporate control.

In a statement issued by Kome Odhomor Media/Communications Lead, HOMEF, to commemorate this year’s World Seed Day, the organizations, while acknowledging the resilience, knowledge and ingenuity of small holders farmers all over the world who have for generation preserved the biodiversity of seeds and food sovereignty, said they have been campaigning against UPOV since 2021.

Advertisement

With the 2025 World Seed Day themed ‘Empowering Farmers-Protecting Biodiversity,’ the Ecological Think Tank, urged the Nigerian government to promote farmer-managed seed systems and invest in local, resilient seed networks that secure food and ecological justice.

In the statement, Nnimmo Bassey, Executive Director, HOMEF, stated that the Nigerian Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Law fails to recognize the country’s unique agricultural landscape.

READ ALSO: World Earth Day: HOMEF Holds Climate Justice Assembly, Tasks N’Delta Activists On Unity

Advertisement

“HOMEF in partnership with other national and international organizations has since 2021 campaigned against the set up of the Nigeria’s Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Law which was developed as a requirement for membership in UPOV.

“The PVP Law threatens farmers right, biodiversity and our food sovereignty.

“Despite our collective voice and a lawsuit against some key components of the law, The Nigerian government on 27th February 2025, deposited the instrument of accession and Nigeria was approved as the eightieth member of UPOV on 27th March 2025.”

Advertisement

Bassey, who argued that the law creates an imbalanced environment where Intellectual Property Rights override farmers’ rights, added: “It promotes the dominance of commercial seed systems over farmers’ and indigenous seed systems, thereby marginalizing the very people who have sustained our food systems for generations.”

READ ALSO: HOMEF Charges Speedy Clean Up Of Ogoniland, N’Delta

Also lending her voice in the statement, Joyce Brown, Project Lead on Hunger Politics, HOMEF, noted that careful analysis of the PVP Law has shown that it places severe restrictions not only on the use of farm-saved seed (propagating material) but extends to harvested material (e.g., grain) and even further to products made directly from harvested material (e.g., milled maize).

Advertisement

Brown further argued that the PVP law encourages the genetic modification of crops which have direct implications on human (use of herbicides and pesticidal crops) and environmental health (monocultures) as well as on biosafety (destruction of non-target organisms).

On her part, food sovereignty activist and Deputy Director of Environmental Rights Action, Mariann Bassey-Orovwuje highlighted that “the process of development of the PVP law was less than transparent, with no public hearings and lack of consultations and participation of smallholder farmers. This is in contrast to the Nigerian Constitution of 1999 which provides for democracy and social justice as per Article 14 (1) and 14(2) (c ).”

In addition, she pointed out that “the law grants final decision-making power to the Minister of Agriculture, particularly in cases of appeal regarding breeder’s rights.

Advertisement

“This provision violates Section 36 of the Nigerian Constitution, which guarantees every citizen the right to a fair hearing and access to justice through the courts.

READ ALSO: International Day For Biological Diversity: HOMEF Calls For Preservation, Reconnection To Nature

“Concentrating such powers in the hands of a single authority undermines democratic principles and judicial independence.”

Advertisement

The groups, therefore, advised that “Nigeria should develop a “sui generis” plant variety protection system tailored to Nigeria’s unique agricultural context, drawing from the African Model Law.

“Such a system should ensure that protection mechanisms do not privilege commercial interests at the expense of communal, farmer-driven seed systems.

“It is essential that this law be developed through inclusive, bottom-up consultations with farmers, indigenous communities, civil society, and public research institutions.

Advertisement

“This seed law must guarantee farmers’ rights, including the right to save, use and exchange farm-saved seeds without criminalization; ensure full transparency and public access to breeder applications to protect against exploitation and safeguard indigenous knowledge; support smallholder farmers through credible credit facilities, infrastructure, and support for public research institutions that serve farmers’ needs.

“Also, Nigeria should prioritise the set up of seed banks at community, local government and state levels to ensure the preservation of indigenous varieties.”

Advertisement

News

IELTS Speaking: How Nigerian Candidates Can Improve Their Band Score

Published

on

For most Nigerian candidates applying to study, work or migrate abroad, the IELTS Speaking test is the single most nerve-wracking 11 to 14 minutes of the entire exam.

Unlike Listening or Reading, there is no answer sheet to fall back on, and the pressure of speaking directly to a trained examiner can make it easy to freeze or, just as damagingly, over-prepare until you sound robotic.

The good news is that the test is graded against four public, named criteria, rather than a vague impression of how confident you sounded. Understanding exactly what each criterion rewards can therefore be one of the fastest ways to improve your band score.

Advertisement

Understand what the examiner is listening for

Every Speaking test is scored equally across four categories: Fluency and Coherence, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy, and Pronunciation, each worth 25 percent of the final band.

Fluency and Coherence measures whether you can keep talking without excessive hesitation, and whether your ideas connect logically rather than jumping around.

Advertisement

Lexical Resource measures the range and precision of your vocabulary, including whether you can paraphrase a question instead of repeating the examiner’s own words back at them.

Grammatical range and accuracy looks at how varied and accurate your sentence structures are, from simple statements to more complex clauses using words like although, because, or if.

Pronunciation covers clarity, stress, and intonation, not whether you sound like a native speaker from a particular country.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: New Air Traffic Control Failure Delays Flights At UK Airports

This last point matters enormously for Nigerian candidates specifically: a Nigerian accent does not lower your score. IELTS examiners are trained to assess intelligibility, not accent neutrality, and both the British Council and IELTS Australia explicitly confirm that speaking with an accent is not penalised as long as your pronunciation is clear enough to be understood without strain.

What actually costs marks is mumbling, running words together so meaning is lost, or shifting stress patterns so unpredictably that the examiner has to work to follow you. Focus your practice on clarity, not on erasing an accent that was never the problem.

Advertisement

Never memorise answers

One of the biggest mistakes candidates can make in the Speaking test is relying on a memorised response, particularly in Part 2, the two-minute monologue based on a task card.

Examiners listen to many candidates and are trained to recognise rehearsed language, whether it is a pre-written answer or a generic template adapted to whatever topic appears.

Advertisement

A scripted answer can sound stiff, contain unnaturally advanced vocabulary that does not match the rest of the candidate’s speech, or ignore the specific details of the task card in favour of prepared content.

When an examiner detects this, it can affect your Fluency and Coherence score because genuine coherence comes from responding directly to what was asked, rather than delivering a monologue prepared in advance.

The solution is not to avoid preparation. Instead, prepare a structure rather than memorising sentences.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Race To Find Survivors As Morocco Quake Deaths Top 1,300

For Part 2, practise a flexible structure that covers the setup, specific details, a turning point or reflection, and what you think about the subject now. Then fill that structure with fresh details based on the topic you receive on test day.

This gives you the organisation examiners reward without the unnatural delivery of a memorised script.

Advertisement

Use natural fillers and steady pace, not dramatic slowdown

It is perfectly acceptable to pause briefly to think. Natural fillers such as “That’s an interesting question” or “Let me think about that” can give you time to organise a more complex response without necessarily costing you marks.

Used sparingly, such phrases can sound like normal discourse markers rather than signs of weakness.

Advertisement

However, dramatically slowing down your speech to avoid mistakes is not a good strategy.

Multiple examiner-facing sources emphasise that speaking too slowly can be just as problematic as speaking too quickly. Fluency and Coherence partly involve how naturally your language flows, and an overly cautious pace can make your speech sound unnatural or uncertain.

READ ALSO: UK Skilled Worker Visa: 10 Ways To Prepare For Your Interview

Advertisement

The target is a steady, natural pace — similar to how you would explain something to a friend. You do not need to race through your answers, but you also should not deliberately stretch every sentence.

If you genuinely do not understand a question, do not guess or pretend you do. Politely asking the examiner to repeat or rephrase the question is explicitly stated by the British Council to have no effect on your score.

That is safer than answering a question you did not understand, because an irrelevant or confused response can affect your coherence more than a brief request for clarification.

Advertisement

Use idioms only when they actually fit

Rare or idiomatic vocabulary can contribute to a strong Lexical Resource score, as the official descriptors reward the natural use of less common and idiomatic vocabulary.

The key word, however, is naturally.

Advertisement

Using an idiom simply because you memorised it from a study list can work against you if it does not fit the context, is mispronounced or sounds rehearsed.

An expression that is forced into an answer can make your speech sound unnatural and may suggest that you are relying on memorised language rather than demonstrating genuine vocabulary range.

READ ALSO: Putin Issues ‘Veiled Threat’ To UK Over Support For Ukraine

Advertisement

One or two well-placed idiomatic expressions used correctly and naturally can therefore be more useful than filling your answers with several memorised phrases.

If you are not confident about an expression or it does not come to you naturally, use a clear, simple sentence instead. A natural response is preferable to a complicated phrase that is confused, forced or mispronounced.

FAQs

Advertisement

Does a strong Nigerian accent negatively impact an applicant’s final IELTS speaking score?

No. Examiners assess pronunciation for clarity and intelligibility, not for how closely you sound like a native speaker of a specific variety of English. A Nigerian accent is not penalised as long as your speech is clear enough to be easily understood; unclear articulation or unpredictable stress patterns are what actually cost marks, regardless of accent.

What should a candidate do if they completely misunderstand the examiner’s question?

Advertisement

Ask the examiner to repeat or rephrase it. This is explicitly permitted and, according to the British Council, does not affect your score. Guessing at an answer to a question you didn’t understand is far riskier, since it can produce an off-topic or confused response that damages your Coherence score.

How does using rare idioms correctly boost the Lexical Resource score in the IELTS exam?

Correctly used idiomatic language demonstrates the range and flexibility that the official Band 7 and above descriptors specifically call for, which can meaningfully lift a Lexical Resource score. The key word is correctly: a forced, mispronounced, or contextually awkward idiom has the opposite effect, since examiners are trained to notice when an expression sounds rehearsed or doesn’t fit the sentence around it.
(TRIBUNE)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Group Commends COREN For Training Engineers In Engineering Failure, Forensic Investigation In Nigeria

Published

on

Foundation for the Development of Shira Community (FODESCO) in Shira Local Government Area of Bauchi state has commended the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN) for conducting a pioneer training on Engineering Failure and Forensic Investigation (EFFI) for 50 licensed engineering practitioners across the country.

Engr. Shehu Wakili, the Chairman of the Foundation made the commendation in an interview with newsmen on Friday.

According to him, the training which was conducted by COREN in collaboration with the Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI) and the Chartered Institute of Forensic and Certified Fraud Investigators of Nigeria (CIFCFIN), was to equip engineers and professionals from academia, industry, and government MDAs with practical skills to investigate infrastructure failures and prevent recurring building collapses.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: ICPC, COREN Working To Curb Quackery In Engineering — Don

He added that the training was also to build a pool of trained specialists who could investigate building collapses and other engineering failures, determine their root causes, and recommend measures to prevent recurrence, saying that the trainees would form part of a register of trained and certified forensic engineering investigators.

He further lauded COREN for the subsequent induction of its member, Engr. Abdullahi Muhammad MNSE, who among the 50 participants, hails from Bauchi state as a Chartered Engineering Forensic and Failure Investigator (CEFFI), certified by CIFCFIN.

Advertisement

“FODESCO is proud of him and wishes him well in all his endeavours”, he prayed.

Wakili, also the Chairman, Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE), Bauchi state chapter, revealed that the training covered failure analysis, forensic investigation methodologies, risk assessment, and professional reporting.

“This initiative supports broader efforts by COREN and the National Assembly to enforce stricter building codes, identify quackery, and ensure accountability across the construction sector,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

NBS: Lagos, Rivers, Enugu Top List As States Generated N5.15trn In 2025

Published

on

The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) has disclosed that 36 states and the FCT generated a total of ₦5.15 trillion in 2025, indicating a growth rate of 40.93 percent from ₦3.65 trillion recorded in 2024.

NBS stated on Thursday citing the Nigeria Revenue Service ( NRS) as source of its information that Lagos emerged top on the list of states with the highest revenue generation in the sum of ₦1.77 trillion.

“Followed by Rivers state ₦428.42 billion and Enugu with IGR record of ₦406.77 billion in the period referenced.”

Advertisement

The. Bureau said Yobe, Ebonyi and Sokoto states reported the least revenues with ₦16.01 billion, ₦17.18 billion and ₦20.48 billion, respectively.

READ ALSO: Trump Bans CNN, Others From White House Coverage, Gives Reason

According to NBS, Pay As You Earn (PAYE) was the most tax revenue recorded during the period, valued at ₦2.64 trillion, representing 69.51 percent of the total tax revenue collected, while capital gains tax was the least with ₦12.40 billion while the share of total tax revenue to total IGR was 73.64 percent nationally.

Advertisement

“Other states and their share of IGR are FCT – N356.34 billion, Ogun – N252.36 billion, Delta – N202.49 billion, Edo – N132.21 billion, Oyo – N103.25 billion and Kano – N102.26 billion.

“Ten other states in lowest category of IGR include Yobe – N16.01 billion, Ebonyi – N17.18 billion, Sokoto – N20.48 billion, Taraba – N28.16 billion ; Benue – N29.57 billion, Zamfara – N30.07 billion, Kebbi – N31.23 billion, Nasarawa – N32.57 billion, Adamawa – N33.76 billion andcBorno – N36.36 billion “.

READ ALSO: Nigeria’s Economy Grew By 3.13% In Q1 2025 — NBS

Advertisement

NBS noted that the states generated their most and least revenue from taxes and other government sources. “PAYE was the dominant revenue source nationally, generating N2.64 trillion and accounting for 69.51% of total tax revenue for the year.

“Other sources included direct assessment, road taxes, stamp duties, withholding taxes and capital gains tax, which was the smallest contributor at N12.40 billion,” the Bureau stated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending