Connect with us

News

Eviction: We Didn’t Choose This Life, Beggars Reply Wike

Published

on

“What have we done?” a beggar, Ali Bappa, exclaimed in disbelief when The PUNCH correspondent informed him about the Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike’s directive to arrest beggars in the nation’s capital.

Wike had during the flag-off ceremony for access road construction in the Katampe District on Tuesday threatened a crackdown on beggars.

Advertisement

Lamenting the increasing population of beggars in the FCT, the former Rivers State governor ordered law enforcement agents to start apprehending them from Monday.

Let me state clearly that we have declared war; Abuja is turning into a beggar city. If you know you have a sister or brother who is a beggar, please, from next week, we will take them away. It is embarrassing that people will come in and the first things they will see are just beggars on the road,” Wike had said.

Not done, Wike accused some of them of being criminals, adding that they had till Sunday to find their way out of the nation’s capital.

Advertisement

Though unaware of the new order, Bappa wondered if any plan had been made to provide them with alternative means of livelihood, expressing concern over their uncertain future.

According to him, begging was never something he took pleasure in, adding that he hated the discrimination attached to being a beggar in the nation’s capital.

He said, “This situation I find myself in is not something I wanted. It can happen to anyone who is still alive. Some people see us coming and run away.

Advertisement

“In public vehicles, nobody wants to sit close to us. You see, there are people who think that just by interacting with me, they will become blind.”

At the moment, Bappa says he and his family rely on the kindness of strangers for survival. With the economy in such dire straits, he fears they may face starvation if no alternative comes their way.

“We depend on what I get from begging. With the current economy, where people are suffering and there’s no food, my family and I will have to stay at home and wait for death because there will be nothing to live on—no food,” he said.

Advertisement

Asked what else he could do if supported, he says he knits well, urging the government to empower beggars instead of locking them up.

“I can knit very well, forget that I am blind. The government should empower us instead of arresting and detaining us. We have many of us who are gifted.”

Unlike Bappa, Safiyanu Bako, another beggar, is aware of the order and plans to leave the nation’s capital for Kebbi, his home state, to continue his trade.

Advertisement

Bako, who has multiple disabilities, believes arresting beggars is far from the right solution, especially in the face of severe hardship he and his colleagues have been experiencing.

He said, “I came from Kebbi to look for a means of livelihood. I didn’t have anything to do, which is why I started begging. I heard the news on the radio yesterday. I don’t want any problems, so I’m going back to my hometown because if I stay here, there will be nothing for me to do.

“I have three children and a wife. Even if I return, I don’t know what I’m going to do. Many of us are willing to work but have no opportunity. If they say we shouldn’t beg anymore, there should be something else in place for us. I am not happy about begging.”

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Rivers Crisis: It’s Up To Him – Wike Gives Conditions For Peace With Fubara

Once thriving, Muhammed’s life took a devastating turn when bandits kidnapped him and his family.

Despite his visual impairment, the beggar, who was in the Maraba area of the FCT when The PUNCH visited, said he always worked hard within the bounds of the law to cater to his family.

Advertisement

But everything he built was lost—sold off to pay the ransom that secured their release from the hands of the bandits.

“I was a farmer, reared chickens and goats as well despite my condition. I was able to take care of my family before we were kidnapped by bandits three years ago. We spent a month with the bandits because we could not afford the amount they demanded. My people sold everything we had to get us out. I left Zamfara for Abuja to see if I could start my life afresh. But things aren’t as easy as I thought they would have been in Abuja,” he said.

He urged the Federal Government to restore peace in his state, expressing readiness to return to farming if his safety could be assured.

Advertisement

“I am ready to return to my state to start farming again, but it is not safe because bandits are still disturbing us. If insecurity is gone, many of us will go back to our farms. The government should help us restore peace in my state,” he added.

Begging as business

For some, begging has evolved into a profitable business rather than a necessity. This is particularly evident among individuals without any form of disability or visible hardship.

Advertisement

The PUNCH observes that these individuals often position themselves in strategic locations across the city, capitalising on the compassion of well-meaning citizens.

Residents of the FCT say this set of people deserves to be kicked out of the territory.

A resident of Lugbe in Abuja, Philip Anjorin, said those engaging in begging as a business should be prosecuted as well.

Advertisement

He said, “We have a lot of them here. You know, with Abuja being seen as a city for the rich, many of them come here to see how they can make it. They can succeed here if they are creative and hardworking, not by deceiving people into giving them money. Personally, I look carefully before giving anyone my money. Those who beg as a business should not only be kicked out but also prosecuted.”

READ ALSO: Top 5 Innovative Countries In Africa

A resident of Kuje, Joshua Friday, shared a similar view. According to him, corporate begging should be considered a crime.

Advertisement

“It’s not just about individuals asking for help anymore; it’s becoming a business for some, exploiting people’s goodwill. We need stronger laws and stricter enforcement to address this growing issue in our society,” he added.

Wike’s predecessors and beggars

The clampdown that Wike ordered on beggars in the FCT isn’t a new phenomenon; similar efforts have been made in the past.

Advertisement

However, these measures often end in futility as beggars inevitably find their way back to the streets of the nation’s capital.

In May 2016, the immediate past FCT minister, Muhammad Bello, declared war on beggars and hawkers. In September of the same year, Bello banned begging in the FCT. While he was in office, over 200 beggars were arrested and returned to their states.

Under Dr Aliyu Umar, who was the FCT minister between 2007 and 2008, 395 beggars were returned to their states while 113 were prosecuted.

Advertisement

His predecessor, Nasiru El-Rufai, who served between 2003 and 2007, rid the city of beggars and repatriated a large number of them to their various states.

Similarly, under Bala Muhammad, there was a clampdown on beggars. In July 2014, 172 beggars were arrested.

Adamu Aliero, who was the minister between 2008 and 2010, also banned street begging and raised a 150-member corps to arrest offenders.

Advertisement

This suggests that Wike’s actions may meet the same fate without addressing the underlying issues driving people to beg, such as poverty and lack of opportunities.

Begging illegal?

States like Kano took proactive measures to address street begging by enacting laws aimed at curbing the practice in 2013.

Advertisement

In a similar vein, the Lagos State House of Assembly deliberated on the idea of introducing a law to curb street begging during a plenary session in 2023.

However, existing legal frameworks already made provisions against street begging in different parts of Nigeria. Under sections 249(b) and 250(1), (2), (3), and (6) of the Criminal Code, street begging is criminalised in the Southern region of the country. Likewise in the Northern region, Section 405 of the Penal Code also criminalises street begging, showing that both the northern and southern parts of Nigeria have legal grounds to combat the problem.

However, the National General Secretary, Committee for the Defence of Human Rights, Gerald Katchy, attributed the widespread prevalence of begging to the government’s failure to fulfil its constitutional responsibilities.

Advertisement

He further noted that taking a hardline approach against beggars alone would not solve the problem.

READA ALSO: ‘Your Leg No Good, You Need Prayer’ – Portable Blasts Babymama, Ashabi

Katchy said, “You are talking about a law prohibiting street begging. Is our government also abiding by the part in the constitution that it must ensure the welfare of citizens? Their failure has brought about hardship. You can’t have more hardship and not expect people not to resort to begging. It is like beating a child and telling him not to cry. That is the highest form of wickedness.

Advertisement

“The government should look at what they are doing that is making people to beg and not to go hard on people begging. It is not justifiable. People are begging because they have no job to do. Address that and you won’t see people begging. Establish them; create a market for them if you cannot employ them. ‘’

The Country Director of Amnesty International, Sanusi Isa, criticised the minister for criminalising poverty with his statements.

He said, “We believe that the minister should not try to criminalise poverty. That approach is very wrong, goes against the rule of law, and fails to recognise that society plays a role in creating people’s circumstances. Presenting them as a nuisance or as unwanted human beings is unfortunate, and it portrays the government as being unaware of how societies evolve.

Advertisement

“We call on the minister to retract his statements and instead focus on protecting all segments of society, including those he refers to as beggars. No one chooses to be a beggar; it’s not something prestigious that people aspire to. Many people are victims of years of corruption, bad policies, and the rampant misappropriation of public funds that deprived them of protection, leaving them vulnerable to such conditions.

“Rather than resorting to arrests, which solve nothing, the minister should consider establishing a social protection scheme for beggars. If these measures were in place, they wouldn’t be on the streets. What I expected from the minister was an announcement about initiating a social protection program, not arrests.”

Reacting to the criminalisation of begging by both the criminal and penal codes, Isa said, “There are many criminalised activities in the constitution that people engage in every day. Why are we more focused on what the poor are doing? The constitution mandates the government to protect its people. Is the government protecting them? Are people not paying ransoms every day in Nigeria? If we want to uphold the law, we should also work to eliminate the outdated laws from colonial times.”

Advertisement

On its part, the Socio-Economic Rights Accountability Project threatened to sue Wike if he makes good his threat of arresting beggars.

In a post on its official X handle, #SerapNigeria, on Wednesday, it stated that no one should be criminalised for their socio-economic status.

The group urged him to address the socio-economic rights of marginalised individuals in the FCT.

Advertisement

“The Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike, must immediately withdraw his apparently unlawful threat to arrest beggars in Abuja or face legal action. No one should be criminalised for engaging in life-sustaining economic activities or because of their economic or social status.

“Mr Wike must address the plight of those experiencing homelessness and those living in poverty in Abuja and not demonise and criminalise them,” the post read.

Multiple calls to the Head of Media and Public Relations at the FCT Social Development Secretariat, Sunday Shaka, on Thursday went unanswered.

Advertisement

The unit, which oversees matters related to beggars, the poor, and the destitute in the FCT, was contacted to inquire about any potential plans to empower beggars in the nation’s capital. But no response was given.
PUNCH

Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments

News

Oba Of Benin Suspends Palace Chiefs

Published

on

The Oba of Benin, Ewuare II, has suspended two of his chiefs for falling for dereliction of duties.

This was contained in a statement signed by the Secretary to the Benin Traditional Council (BTC), Frank Irabor and made available to journalists in Benin City.

Advertisement

He said their suspension was as a result of their long absence from the palace, resulting in their failure to carry out their palace responsibilities.

The suspended persons are: Chief John Igiehon, the Izuwako of Benin and chief Aimiukpomonyako Oghogho (Ebengho), the Oyenmwensoba of Benin.

READ ALSO: Oba Of Benin Suspends 67 Dukes

Advertisement

“The under-mentioned two (2) chiefs have been suspended from the Palace of the Oba of Benin.

“This is as a result of their long absence from the Palace, resulting in their failure to carry out their Palace responsibilities.

“The public is advised to be wary of unscrupulous chiefs that are no longer functioning in the Palace. His Royal Majesty has approved their _ Suspension and directed the public be duly informed. 

Advertisement

“The names of the chiefs are: – ; 1. CHIEF JOHN IGIEHON, THE IZUWAKO OF BENIN and, _ 2 CHIEF AIMIUKPOMONYAKO OGHOGHO (EBENGHO), THE OYENMWENSOBA OF BENIN”, the statement said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Lawyers Fault EFCC Statement, Say It’s Misleading

Published

on

Some legal practitioners in Bauchi state have faulted the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) official statement about their client on Wednesday, adding that it was erroneous, false and misleading.

It could be recalled that EFCC posted on its official Facebook handle that a Bauchi State High Court has cleared the commission to proceed with its investigation of a former Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party in Bauchi State, Hamza Koshe, and his company, Pentech Engineering Nigeria Ltd.

Advertisement

According to the EFCC statement, the commission said Justice Aliyu Baba, in a judgment delivered on July 30, 2025, dismissed an application by Koshe seeking to restrain the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission from probing him.

However, in a statement jointly signed and made available to newsmen in Bauchi on Thursday by Jibrin S. Jibrin Esq, M.M. Usman Esq, H.B. Pali Esq, Abbas Ibrahim Esq, I.G. Agwam Esq and Salome Audu Esq all counsel to Pentech Engineering Nigeria Ltd & Anor as well as Koshe insisted that the statement was misleading.

READ ALSO: EFCC Orders Arrest Of Dismissed Officer On Lege Miami’s Show

Advertisement

According to them, the EFCC owed the public the duty of relating only the truth of what the courts decided as regards the contract financing agreement in the issues their clients were parties.

“Our attention as the legal representatives of Pentech Engineering Nigeria Ltd & Alhaji Hamza Koshe in respect of suit No. BA/271/2024 has been drawn to the statement posted on the official page of the EFCC on Wednesday, where the Commission supposedly rendered an analysis of the judgement delivered by the High Court of Justice No. 4 Bauchi Presided by Justice Aliyu Usman on the 30th July 2025.

“Now against the background of the erroneous, false and misleading publication by the EFCC on the matter, we deem it necessary to set the records straight by stating what actually is the truth of the matter in terms of the enrolled judgment Order of the Court to which this press release is attached.

Advertisement

“It is proper to state as a fact that in an earlier judgement relating to the subject of this release, the verdict of the High Court of Justice No. 10 Bauchi presided by Justice M. M. Abubakar delivered on the 19th December, 2024 is to the effect that the Contract Financing Agreement the subject matter of the suit having been found to be valid and not contravening any law remains enforceable hence, Pentech Engineering Nigeria Ltd is accorded the applicable injunctive reliefs as regards the activities of the Commission.

READ ALSO: Things To Know About Procurement Fraud As A Nigerian – EFCC

“We state as a fact that the main question of law determined in Justice Aliyu Baba Usman’s judgment is to the effect that the Contract Financing Agreement the subject of the suit is valid.

Advertisement

“The EFCC failed to state in its statement in reference the fact that many parties and contractors concerned or involved in the Contract Financing Agreement in the issue have been invited by the Commission with virtually all of them responding, honoring its invitation on the matter and thereby discharging their legal obligation speak volumes of ‘the bidding of some’ which the publication seeks to achieve ab initio,” said the lawyers.

The counsel added that the mischief and deliberate misrepresentation in EFCC’s statement could be seen when not only did it make no mention of this fact but also created the impression that their clients went to Court to evade investigation on the matter.

They said that Koshe was a guest of the Commission having honored its invitation in September 2024 which he was released on administrative bail, the terms and conditions applicable to which he has been observing.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: EFCC Recovers Funds Lost To CBEX Fraud, Forfeiture Process Underway — Olukoyede

“It is also important to clarify as a fact that there is no truth at all in the Commission’s statement to the effect that our client sought a perpetual injunction of general nature against the Commission’s activities.

“The truth about the reliefs sought by our clients is as contained in the Court’s processes filed in the suit in reference.

Advertisement

“We challenge the Commission to provide evidence of where our client ever sought a perpetual injunction at large or of general nature against it or any other body duly established by law.

“We urge members of the public to disregard in its entirety EFCC’s statement on the subject and be guided in its stead by the facts as contained in the relevant court processes to which this release is attached,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Tricycle Riders Sentenced To Five Years Over WhatsApp Group Mobilising Protest Against Nigerian Gov

Published

on

Borno State Governor Babagana Umara Zulum has been accused of being power-drunk following allegations that he ordered the arrest and conviction of two members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and tricycle operators for creating a WhatsApp group to mobilize a protest against his administration.

Crack police operatives carried out the arrests in Maiduguri before the scheduled End Bad Governance protest.

Advertisement

The two men, identified as Mohammed Bukar (alias Awana) and Ibrahim Mohammed (alias Babayo), were convicted on June 30, 2025, by Hon. Justice A.M. Ali and handed a five-year prison sentence.

Court documents with reference number BOHC/MG/CR/2150/CT10/2024 revealed that the men were accused of creating a WhatsApp group called “Zanga Zanga Group”—translated as Protest Group—to mobilize Keke Napep (tricycle) operators for a planned demonstration against the Borno State Government.

Mohammed Bukar and Ibrahim Mohammed were the 6th and 7th defendants in the case in which Governor Zulum accused them of using videos on the WhatsApp group to instigate Keke Napep (tricycle) operators in Borno State to join the protest against the government.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Zulum Calls For Prayers As Over 35,000 Boko Haram, ISWAP Terrorists Surrender

They were also accused of producing videos in Kanuri and Hausa languages, urging tricycle riders to come out en masse, declaring “no going back” on the planned protest against the Borno State Government.

On June 30, 2025, Hon. Justice A.M. Ali sentenced the duo to five years’ imprisonment for allegedly planning the protest on WhatsApp.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the seven defendants were charged with two counts: Count 1. That the defendants conspired to form a group named Zanga Zanga group (or protest group) on WhatsApp social media platform wherein they agreed to take up arms, to wit; guns, knives, bows and arrows and all forms of dangerous weapon against the Government thereby committing an offence contrary to Sections 60 and punishable under Section 79 of the Penal Code Laws of Borno State 2023.

Count 2. That the defendants formed a group named Zanga Zanga group (or. protest group) on WhatsApp social media platform and agreed to take up arms, to wit; guns, knives, bows and arrows and all forms of dangerous weapon against the Government thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 79 of the Penal Code Laws of Borno State 2023 All the defendants pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against them at their arraignment on April 11, 2024. The prosecution called four witnesses to prove their case.

However, all defendants pleaded not guilty when arraigned on April 11, 2024.

Advertisement

The prosecution called four witnesses, including Sgt. Isa Abubakar, an investigating police officer attached to the Crime Squad of the Nigerian Police, Borno State Command.

READ ALSO:Zulum Tasks Nigerian Military To Take War To Boko Haram’s Enclaves

Sgt. Abubakar testified that on July 21, 2024, the 6th defendant used one of the videos as his WhatsApp status to mobilize tricycle riders for the End Bad Governance protest.

Advertisement

He added that the 6th and 7th defendants also made another video in Hausa, saying, “Allah Yaisa Zulum two Billion Namu,” roughly translating to “May God punish Zulum for our two billion.”

He further testified that he downloaded the videos and arrested the two suspects on July 23, 2024, before handing them over to the Crime Squad office in Maiduguri.

Justice Ali said, “I have considered the pleas for leniency made by each of the convicts and the pleas made on their behalf by their counsel. The 5th convict is 17 years old, the 2nd convict is 14 years old, and the 3rd convict is 15 years old.

Advertisement

“The 5th, 2nd, and 3rd convicts are therefore young persons within the meaning of the Children and Young Persons Law of Borno State.

READ ALSO:Explosion Rocks Borno Military Barracks

It was held by the Apex court in the case of Aminu Tanko VS the State 2009 Legalpedia SC 61216 that where the sentence prescribed upon conviction in criminal charge is term of imprisonment then some extenuating factors, such as the age of the convict and whether he is a first offender can be taken into consideration in passing the sentence.

Advertisement

“It is in this regard that, on the 1st count charge, I sentence the 5th, 2nd, and 3rd defendants to community service specifically washing the toilets of General Hospital Maiduguri, for 3 months. Make an order that they be given 20 strokes of the cane each.

“On the 2nd count charge, the 5th, 2nd, and 3rd convicts are sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment. The 2nd and 3rd convicts are to be held at the children’s remand home, while the 5th defendant is to be remanded at the Maiduguri correctional centre. The period of imprisonment should commence today.”

Regarding the first convict, who is also a young man, he is hereby sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. The first convict is sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. The 6th convict is sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. The 7th convict is sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. All sentences should commence today, the 30/6/2025,” Justice Ali added.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Merson Reveals One Game That Will Determine If Arsenal Win Trophy This Season

Earlier, SaharaReporters reported that the families of two commercial tricycle operators had accused the state government, led by Governor Babagana Zulum, of ordering their arrest and prolonged detention after they allegedly planned a peaceful protest over the alleged mismanagement of funds contributed by riders.

The detained operators, identified as Muhammed Bukar and Ibrahim Muhammed—both members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC)—were arrested by the Police Crack Squad on the alleged orders of Borno State Commissioner for Youth and Sports Development, Saina Buba.

Advertisement

According to relatives, the riders were detained for three months and two weeks at a police facility before spending an additional two months in prison custody while facing trial.

At the centre of the dispute is a daily N100 ticket fee collected from tricycle operators, supposedly serving as insurance to provide financial support to any operator facing emergencies.

However, the riders alleged that officials managing the fund embezzled the money and failed to assist operators in need, prompting plans for the protest before their arrest.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending