Connect with us

Headline

FULL LIST: 2024 Nobel Prize Winners, Groundbreaking Contributions

Published

on

The Nobel Prizes, established by the will of Alfred Nobel, continue to recognise the most outstanding achievements across various fields.

Spanning six prize categories—Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, Peace, and Economic Sciences—the Nobel Prizes are announced every October and presented in a grand ceremony on 10 December.

In 2024, the laureates honoured will have made remarkable contributions to humanity, advancing knowledge and innovation.

Advertisement

This year’s winners have pushed the boundaries of science, deepened our understanding of the world, and driven social change through their work, says the organising body.

The 2024 Nobel Prize announcements kicked off on Monday, October 7, with one prize revealed each day through Friday, October 11. The final announcement, for the Economics prize, was made earlier today, Monday.

Chair of the Nobel Committee, The Swedish Academy, Anders Olsson, made the announcements, as obtained from its official website.

Advertisement

Below is the full list of the 2024 Nobel Prize winners and a look into their groundbreaking innovations:

Physics:

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics to John J. Hopfield and Geoffrey E. Hinton “for foundational discoveries and inventions that enable machine learning with artificial neural networks.”

Advertisement

This year’s two Nobel Prize laureates in physics have used tools from physics to develop methods that are the foundation of today’s powerful machine learning.

John Hopfield created an associative memory that can store and reconstruct images and other types of patterns in data.

Geoffrey Hinton invented a method that can autonomously find properties in data, and perform tasks such as identifying specific elements in pictures.

Advertisement

Chemistry:

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded for groundbreaking work on proteins, life’s essential chemical tools.

Half of the prize goes to David Baker for his pioneering work in computational protein design, while the other half is shared by Demis Hassabis and John M. Jumper for their breakthrough in protein structure prediction.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Frustration As Fuel Sells Between N1150 And N1500 Per Litre In Bayelsa

David Baker has achieved the remarkable feat of designing entirely new proteins, using the 20 amino acids that typically make up these molecules.

His creations have vast potential applications, including pharmaceuticals, vaccines, nanomaterials, and sensors.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Demis Hassabis and John Jumper made a major advancement in 2020 with their development of AlphaFold2, an AI model that predicts the complex 3D structures of proteins based on their amino acid sequences.

This solved a 50-year-old problem in biology, enabling scientists to predict the structure of nearly all known proteins and further research in areas like antibiotic resistance and plastic-degrading enzymes.

These discoveries open up incredible possibilities for science and medicine, enhancing our ability to understand life at a molecular level and design proteins that benefit humankind.

Advertisement

Physiology or Medicine:

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun for their discovery of microRNA and its crucial role in post-transcriptional gene regulation.

Their groundbreaking research unveiled a new class of tiny RNA molecules that play a pivotal role in regulating gene activity, which is essential for the proper development and functioning of multicellular organisms, including humans.

Advertisement

Gene regulation allows different cell types, like muscle and nerve cells, to have distinct characteristics despite containing the same genetic instructions.

Ambros and Ruvkun’s discovery of microRNA introduced a new dimension to this process, showing how these small molecules help control which genes are active in each cell.

Today, it is known that the human genome codes for over 1,000 microRNAs, which are fundamental to the regulation of gene expression, shaping the development and function of organisms.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Nigeria Is Well Placed To Be West Africa’s Tech Hub Says HP Executive 

Literature:

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to South Korean author Han Kang for her “intense poetic prose that confronts historical traumas and exposes the fragility of human life.”

Advertisement

Born in Gwangju in 1970 and later moving to Seoul, Han Kang grew up in a literary family, with her father being a well-known novelist.

Her career began in 1993 with the publication of poems in the magazine Literature and Society, and her prose debut followed in 1995 with the short story collection Love of Yeosu.

Han Kang’s international breakthrough came with The Vegetarian (2007), a novel exploring the violent consequences of a woman’s refusal to conform to societal norms.

Advertisement

Her work often intertwines mental and physical pain, reflecting a deep connection to Eastern philosophies.

Han’s prose is marked by a unique sensitivity to the relationship between body and soul, the living and the dead, and the invisible rules that govern life.

Through her poetic and experimental style, she confronts historical trauma and human fragility, making her a significant voice in contemporary literature.

Advertisement

Peace:

The 2024 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Nihon Hidankyo, the Japanese organisation representing atomic bomb survivors (Hibakusha) from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

This grassroots movement has been recognised for its tireless advocacy for a world free of nuclear weapons and for effectively conveying the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear warfare through personal testimonies.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: CNG: NNPC Signs Gas Supply Deal For $3.3bn Methanol Plant In Bayelsa

Since the atomic bombings in 1945, Hibakusha have played a crucial role in establishing a powerful international norm, known as the “nuclear taboo,” which deems the use of nuclear weapons morally unacceptable.

Despite the significant progress made in raising awareness about the dangers of nuclear weapons, the Nobel Committee warns that this taboo is currently under threat as nuclear powers modernise their arsenals and new nations seek to acquire nuclear capabilities.

Advertisement

The committee acknowledges the Hibakusha’s vital contributions to this cause and honours their commitment to peace, emphasising that no nuclear weapon has been used in war for nearly 80 years.

As the Hibakusha age, it is imperative that their experiences and messages are preserved and passed on to future generations, ensuring the continued fight for nuclear disarmament.

The award to Nihon Hidankyo aligns with Alfred Nobel’s vision of recognising those whose efforts significantly benefit humanity, joining a legacy of previous laureates dedicated to nuclear disarmament.

Advertisement

Economic Sciences:

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson for their groundbreaking research on the role of institutions in shaping the wealth and development of nations.

Their work emphasises that institutions established to exploit the masses hinder long-term economic growth, while inclusive institutions that uphold economic freedoms and the rule of law foster prosperity.

Advertisement

Despite short-term gains for elites under extractive systems, the transition to inclusive institutions is blocked due to a “commitment problem” — elites fear they will lose economic power and that promises of reform won’t be honoured.

The laureates’ model identifies three key components: the struggle over resource allocation and political power, the potential for mass mobilisation as a threat to the ruling elite, and the difficulty of credible commitments.

Their work explains why some countries oscillate between democracy and authoritarianism and why elites may block technological progress to maintain control.

Advertisement

This insight sheds light on the persistent inequality between countries with inclusive institutions and those without.

Nobel Foundation

The Nobel Foundation, responsible for managing Nobel’s fortune, ensures that his vision—”to reward those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind”—is realised.

Advertisement

Since the first awards in 1901, the Nobel Prizes and the Economic Sciences Prize have been awarded 623 times to 1,004 laureates, with a total of 969 individuals and 27 organisations having been honoured.

Each year, the selection process begins with thousands of academicians, scientists, and parliamentary members worldwide submitting nominations.

These nominations must have remained confidential for 50 years, preserving the integrity and mystique of the Nobel process. Details gathered from the Nobel Prize website were revealed to PUNCH Online.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments

Headline

Antitrust Trial: US Asks Court To Break Up Google’s Ad Business

Published

on

By

Google faces a fresh federal court test on Monday as US government lawyers ask a judge to order the breakup of the search engine giant’s ad technology business.

The lawsuit is Google’s second such test this year, following a similar government demand to split up its empire that was shot down by a judge earlier this month.

Monday’s case focuses specifically on Google’s ad tech “stack” — the tools that website publishers use to sell ads and that advertisers use to buy them.

Advertisement

In a landmark decision earlier this year, Federal Judge Leonie Brinkema agreed with the US Department of Justice (DOJ) that Google maintained an illegal grip on this market.

READ ALSO:Google Fined $36m In Australia Over Anticompetitive Search Deals

Monday’s trial is set to determine what penalties and changes Google must implement to undo its monopoly.

Advertisement

According to filings, the US government will argue that Google should spin off its ad publisher and exchange operations. The DOJ will also ask that after the divestitures are complete, Google be banned from operating an ad exchange for 10 years.

Google will argue that the divestiture demands go far beyond the court’s findings, are technically unfeasible, and would be harmful to the market and smaller businesses.

We’ve said from the start that DOJ’s case misunderstands how digital advertising works and ignores how the landscape has dramatically evolved, with increasing competition and new entrants,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Google Introduces Initiative To Equip 1,000 Nigerian Developers

In a similar case in Europe, the European Commission, the EU’s antitrust enforcer, earlier this month fined Google 2.95 billion euros ($3.47 billion) over its control of the ad tech market.

Brussels ordered behavioral changes, drawing criticism that it was going easy on Google as it had previously indicated that a divestiture may be necessary.

Advertisement

This remedy phase of the US trial follows a first trial that found Google operated an illegal monopoly. It is expected to last about a week, with the court set to meet again for closing arguments a few weeks later.

The trial begins in the same month that a separate judge rejected a government demand that Google divest its Chrome browser, in an opinion that was largely seen as a victory for the tech giant.

That was part of a different case, also brought by the US Department of Justice, in which the tech giant was found responsible for operating an illegal monopoly, this time in the online search space.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Iran Hackers Target Harris And Trump Campaigns – Google

Instead of a major breakup of its business, Google was required to share data with rivals as part of its remedies.

The US government had pushed for Chrome’s divestment, arguing the browser serves as a crucial gateway to the internet that brings in a third of all Google web searches.

Advertisement

Shares in Google-parent Alphabet have skyrocketed by more than 20 percent since that decision.

Judge Brinkema has said in pre-trial hearings that she will closely examine the outcome of the search trial when assessing her path forward in her own case.

These cases are part of a broader bipartisan government campaign against the world’s largest technology companies. The US currently has five pending antitrust cases against such companies.

Advertisement

AFP

Continue Reading

Headline

Google Faces Court Battle Over Breakup Of Ad Tech Business

Published

on

By

Google faces a fresh federal court test on Monday as US government lawyers ask a judge to order the breakup of the search engine giant’s ad technology business.

The lawsuit is Google’s second such test this year after the California-based tech juggernaut saw a similar government demand to split up its empire shot down by a judge earlier this month.

Monday’s case focuses specifically on Google’s ad tech “stack” — the tools that website publishers use to sell ads and that advertisers use to buy them.

Advertisement

In a landmark decision earlier this year, Federal Judge Leonie Brinkema agreed with the US Department of Justice (DOJ) that Google maintained an illegal grip on this market.
Monday’s trial is set to determine what penalties and changes Google must implement to undo its monopoly.

According to filings, the US government will argue that Google should spin off its ad publisher and exchange operations. The DOJ will also ask that after the divestitures are complete, Google be banned from operating an ad exchange for 10 years.

READ ALSO:Google Fined $36m In Australia Over Anticompetitive Search Deals

Advertisement

Google will argue that the divestiture demands go far beyond the court’s findings, are technically unfeasible, and would be harmful to the market and smaller businesses.

We’ve said from the start that DOJ’s case misunderstands how digital advertising works and ignores how the landscape has dramatically evolved, with increasing competition and new entrants,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs.

In a similar case in Europe, the European Commission, the EU’s antitrust enforcer, earlier this month fined Google 2.95 billion euros ($3.47 billion) over its control of the ad tech market.
Brussels ordered behavioral changes, drawing criticism that it was going easy on Google as it had previously indicated that a divestiture may be necessary.

Advertisement

This remedy phase of the US trial follows a first trial that found Google operated an illegal monopoly. It is expected to last about a week, with the court set to meet again for closing arguments a few weeks later.

READ ALSO:Perplexity AI Makes $34.5bn Surprise Bid For Google’s Chrome Browser

The trial begins in the same month that a separate judge rejected a government demand that Google divest its Chrome browser, in an opinion that was largely seen as a victory for the tech giant.

Advertisement

That was part of a different case, also brought by the US Department of Justice, in which the tech giant was found responsible for operating an illegal monopoly, this time in the online search space.
Instead of a major breakup of its business, Google was required to share data with rivals as part of its remedies.

The US government had pushed for Chrome’s divestment, arguing the browser serves as a crucial gateway to the internet that brings in a third of all Google web searches.
Shares in Google-parent Alphabet have skyrocketed by more than 20 percent since that decision.

Judge Brinkema has said in pre-trial hearings that she will closely examine the outcome of the search trial when assessing her path forward in her own case.

Advertisement

These cases are part of a broader bipartisan government campaign against the world’s largest technology companies. The US currently has five pending antitrust cases against such companies.

Continue Reading

Headline

Peru Anti-government Protesters Clash With Police

Published

on

By

Hundreds of anti-government protesters clashed with police in the Peruvian capital Lima on Saturday, throwing stones and sticks as officers fired tear gas on the demonstrators, AFP journalists reported.

The protest, organized by a youth collective called “Generation Z”, is part of growing social unrest in Peru against organized crime, corruption in public office, and a recent pension reform.

“Today, there is less democracy than before. It’s getting worse… because of fear, because of extortion,” said 54-year-old protester Gladys, who declined to give her last name.

Advertisement

Around 500 people gathered in the city center, under heavy police presence.

READ ALSO:FULL TEXT: US Govt Releases Text Messages Between Charlie Kirk’s Suspect, Roommate

Congress has no credibility, it doesn’t even have the approval of the people… It is wreaking havoc in this country,” said protester Celene Amasifuen.

Advertisement

The clashes broke out as demonstrators tried to approach executive and congressional buildings in Lima.

The radio station Exitosa said that its reporter and a cameraman were hit by pellets, commonly fired by law enforcement.

READ ALSO:‘Over 7,000 Nigerians Sought Asylum In Sweden In 24 Years’

Advertisement

Police said at least three officers were wounded.

Approval ratings for President Dina Boluarte, whose term ends next year, have plummeted amid rising extortion and organized crime cases.

Several opinion polls show the government and conservative-majority Congress are seen by many as corrupt institutions.

Advertisement

This week, the legislature passed a law requiring young adults to join a private pension fund, despite many facing a precarious working environment.

AFP

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version