Connect with us

News

Tribune At 75: A Bouquet Of Stories [Monday Lines]

Published

on

By Lasisi Olagunju

It happened that the NCNC-controlled Ibadan District Council (IDC) under the chairmanship of Alhaji Adegoke Adelabu chose a Saturday, 7 January, 1956, to sit. The council took a decision at that meeting to suspend the salaries of the Olubadan, Oba I. B. Akinyele; Otun Olubadan, Chief Yesufu Kobiowu and the Balogun, Chief Salawu Aminu. Councillor Yinusa Ladoja who moved the motion for the suspension said the offence of the three was that they had not been attending the council’s meeting regularly.

The council passed another motion declaring that Chief E.A. Adeyemo, its treasurer, “should henceforth be known as Mr. Adeyemo” and that if the Chief was against being called a Mr, he should resign his position as the IDC treasurer. The same IDC had earlier appointed and installed an ‘Olubadan’ without recourse to the regional government. The audacity of power in that action could not prevail, it failed. The war of salary suspension was a continuation of that botched putsch.

Advertisement

Some persons and institutions exist to fight other people’s wars. The archives are full of Nigerian Tribune’s wars against powers and principalities. The Olubadan vs IDC war above is one of such. From that point till victory came the way of the harassed, Tribune did not sheathe its sword. As the victims of power scrambled to ward off the impudence of local politics, the battle became that of the newspaper and its operatives. And, it needs not be said that the palm trees of Ijaye till today bear scars of Ogunmola’s war. Olubadan Isaac Akinyele and his chiefs prevailed on that occasion and on other matters. Indeed, each of those chiefs, at God’s appointed time, later rose to become the Olubadan.

What do you give an old man who has everything? Ralph Waldo Emerson asks the poet to bring his poem, the painter his picture, the shepherd his lamb. But how about presenting the old poet his own poem, the singer his song, and the painter his painting exploits as proof of their worthy existence? A newspaper lives by telling stories of events as they break – and commenting on them. The reports may be pleasant – they are seldom pleasant. They may be gory and bad – bad news are good news. How well they sing and how long they have stood against the elements tell of a bard’s success. I retold the story above in celebration of Tribune’s 75 years of consequential existence.

A good newspaper is a recorder of history and a predictor of the future. Let us go to another Tribune exclusive; the report of a crime that was committed 63 years ago:

Advertisement

‘The Head on A Bike’ was the lead story of the Nigerian Tribune of Tuesday, 7 November, 1961. It was the report of the murder of a 38-year-old Muslim priest who was killed on Saturday, 4 November, 1961 in Iperu, Remo Division of the old Western Region. The man met his death while he was going to the mosque for his early morning prayer. Who did it? One Kehinde, aged 27, did it and owned the crime. I reproduce, verbatim, the story as published by the Nigerian Tribune 63 years ago:

“A first-hand account of the development which followed the beheading of the priest was given the Tribune yesterday by Mr. Subomi Balogun, crown counsel in the Western Nigeria Ministry of Justice. He ran into the assassin while he (the assassin) was still conveying the preacher’s head on a bicycle. ‘It was a terrible situation,’ the counsel exclaimed.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: In Defence Of Nepotism [Monday Lines]

Advertisement

“Mr. Balogun said he was returning from Lagos when he found a man on a bicycle with a human head dripping blood. A crowd of people were trailing after him as he progressed towards the police station with a cutlass shining in his hand. The crown counsel then drove straight to the station, announced himself, and requested that the Nigeria Police be contacted immediately to take up the matter.

“‘Soon, the man came in, placed the head down and put his foot on it,’ the crown counsel added. The constables broke up in commotion and not until the assassin threw down his cutlass that the constable reentered the station. But there were no Nigeria Police around.

“On his way to Ibadan, however, the counsel saw some traffic policemen and instructed them to proceed to Iperu to take up the matter.

Advertisement

“’I asked them to report to my ministry as soon as investigations are completed but we are yet to receive a report,’ Mr. Subomi Balogun added.” End of story.

Now, you may be wondering why I picked that gory news report for this piece? The interest went beyond the oddity of a murderer holding aloft the head of his victim. The victim was neither a celebrity nor a public figure and the event happened in a small rural community where newspapers might not sell. Yet, the Tribune used the news as its lead story. Did you also notice the name of the crown counsel in the story? Subomi Balogun. I noted the lawyer’s impressive sense of duty – he didn’t have to do all he did there in pursuit of justice for the victim and the villain. The lawyer’s initiatives at that scene and his success going forward taught lessons in how diligence in youth could lead to greatness later in life.

When it turned 20 in 1969, the Nigerian Tribune ran an editorial in which it reminded itself of its founding promise and pledged itself to it: “When this newspaper was founded in November 1949, its founder chose for it an appropriate title. In Roman history the tribune of the people was one of two or ten officers chosen by the people to protect their liberties against senate and consuls. And this is the role which the Nigerian Tribune has been playing…The greatest tragedy that could befall a newspaper is for that newspaper to change its basic character and become mealy-mouthed in response to oppression and pressures. For that would be a gross and unforgivable betrayal of the trust of its readers and advertisers. That tragedy will NEVER befall this newspaper.”

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Petrol Price As Slow Poison [Monday Lines]

I was not there when the story of the Nigerian Tribune started 75 years ago. But if a child did not meet an event, he would meet its account. And I am here now. What birthday gift can be better for a 75-year-old than a recap of the good they have done? Here, today, I reproduce stories which even Tribune itself may not remember it ever told. Events may be local in setting but history teaches us that no event that has made it into a newspaper of value is, with the benefit of hindsight, local. That is why I started this tribute with the Ibadan story.

In politics, if the northern Nigerian woman voted yesterday and will vote tomorrow, she has the Nigerian Tribune to thank. You will find it difficult to believe that years after independence, the northern establishment still foot-dragged on granting women of that region the right to vote. And, you know, the northern region was not just today’s North East and North West. It started from Offa and Erin Ile, pure, secular Yoruba towns, stretching northwards through Benue, Plateau, to the borders with Niger Republic and Chad. Women in all those places were banned from voting in general elections. And they were in an independent country. The Nigerian Tribune went all out shouting from the rooftops: “Give them the votes.”

Advertisement

I quote from its editorial of Thursday, 25 March, 1965: “It has become a habit whenever we talk of the desirability of giving votes to the women in the North, the temporary rulers of that region will tell us that this inalienable right of the women would be conceded only when the Northern potentates want it. This is a wrong approach… After all, voting is not obligatory either in our constitution or statute. If the Sardauna and his co-travellers do not want their wives in purdah to go out for voting at election time, they can so order as husbands and wives. On the other hand those whose hands are not tied down by religious susceptibility MUST be given the right to vote. It is as simple as that.”

For making that noise, and championing that cause, the paper, its owners and its journalists were abused and accused of ‘goading’ the north into a precipitate action on a matter that was for the region to decide. But the Tribune said no, a citizen’s right to vote would never be a regional issue, it was constitutional and national. The newspaper fought and won that war. The results are in the millions of votes which today give the north bragging swags of numerical advantage. So, when we write and we are abused by today’s temporary rulers and their minions, we shrug them off because we have the past to reassure and console us that we are right, they are wrong.

When elections became very costly and increasingly scandalous as we have them now, the Nigerian Tribune did not keep quiet. I read a 1965 editorial carrying a brutal title: ‘White Elephant Elections.’ Sometime in the early 1960s, the northern regional government barred civil servants from acquiring more than one plot of land to build petrol stations. The Nigerian Tribune praised that action but declared, in another editorial, that politicians who made the law needed it more than the hapless civil servants.

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: The Waist Beads Of Olajumoke [Monday Lines]

Courage and diligence and abundance of grace are ingredients of success in life. Decades of loyalty to its goals, fidelity to truth garnished with the right dose of intransigence, gave the Nigerian Tribune reasons for its existence. It will be 75 years old on Saturday this week. The paper’s story is a story of struggle and survival in the midst of thorns and thistles of politics, of business and, even of life.

The Chicago Tribune was founded in 1847 – a century plus two years before the birth of its Nigerian namesake. It came clutching a statement of principles which emphasized a newspaper’s reason for existence: “…to present the news of the day, to foster commerce and industry, to inform and lead public opinion, and to furnish that vital check upon government which no constitution has ever been able to provide.” When it celebrated its 175th anniversary, it proudly announced that it had spent all its years “carrying out the mission of delivering the truth every day.” The Nigerian Tribune, since its birth in 1949, has been doing exactly that. It is a citizen of Nigeria domiciled in Ibadan, Western Nigeria. It has come a long way reporting local and national, fighting big and small wars that test the will of courage. Where and when it faltered, it admitted its errors, made amends and moved on. In all its battles, the integrity of its founder – and of all its owners, plus the incredibly fierce loyalty of generations of its workforce and readers have been the bulwark of its defence. It is the reason why it is alive to celebrate its 75th anniversary this week Saturday.

Advertisement

When I sauntered into Ibadan in May 1995 to pick up this job at the Tribune House, there were other options in that city. There was a newspaper called Third Eye which paid double what Tribune offered. There was the Daily Sketch nestled comfortably between Cocoa House and Kingsway building, and not far from a high-rise glass building called Broking House. Today, those other papers exist as mere memories. What killed them?

Leo Bogart’s ‘Newspapers in Transition’ published in The Wilson Quarterly in 1982 reads like it was written for the Lagos-Ibadan press of today. “The fallen giants in the business have been stricken by the sickness of their home cities…,” he wrote. When an American evening newspaper, the Minneapolis Star, was rested in April 1982, its editor, Stephen Isaacs, was asked by American monthly news trade magazine, Editor & Publisher (E&P), what he thought the future of the newspaper press looked like. Isaacs looked deep into space and said: “What do I see ahead? I talked to many publishers recently and was startled by the number who have in effect told me that the newspaper business is a dying industry. A dinosaur. Some will survive – the very big and the very small – but the in-betweens are going to face rough going in the electronic era…” His inner eye was sharp. Between that time – 42 years ago – and now, a lot of water has escaped the media dam down into nothingness.

Against all odds, the Nigerian Tribune has survived these past 75 years. What are the secrets? Lawrence Pinkham, professor of history and journalism, suggests that a newspaper won’t have problems safeguarding its existence if it manages to find ways to balance “the double necessity of staying in business and staying in journalism.” That is one dilemma that wracks the present as it wrecked the past and threatens the future.

Advertisement

By age and reputation, the Tribune is firmly established as Nigeria’s authentic newspaper of record. The sheer volume and the integrity of its archives qualify it as a national asset. The authenticity of its past and position, the wisdom in its age, the independence of its opinion and the audacity of its truth have combined to hoist it on a pedestal of importance. Go to the archives and check the names that have written for it: Bisi Onabanjo, Lateef Jakande, Gani Fawehinmi, Tai Solarin, Justice Adewale Thompson, Wumi Adegbonmire, Tola Adeniyi, Banji Ogundele, Banji Kuroloja, Biodun Oduwole, Folu Olamiti, Garba Shehu, Shehu Sani, Yinka Odumakin, Pius Adesanmi. What I have taken here is a risk. The list I wrote is incomplete. I beg for the forgiveness of the unlisted. I had to name names as a sample of the goodly heritage we carry.

At the DAME awards event in Lagos last year, Mr Eluem Emeka Izeze, many years Editor-in-Chief of The Guardian walked up to me, congratulated me on winning the Informed Commentary category of the awards the fourth time consecutively. He said the Tribune historically was famed as the king of uncompromising commentary and column writing in Nigeria. He particularly congratulated the newspaper and its columnists on their keeping alive the Ibadan content of the Lagos-Ibadan press axis. It is a privilege we have. We also owe it as a debt to the past and a duty to the future.

It is sweet to celebrate with Tribune at 75. But it is also a challenge, daunting in its demands. After it survived its darkest moment, its founder, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, christened the Nigerian Tribune Apamaku (survivor). What does it mean to refuse to die? Celebrating Tribune’s 50 years of existence in his Uncle Bola’s Column in the Sunday Tribune of 7 November, 1999, Chief Bola Ige wrote that the heritage we have defies fear. More importantly, our bequest
exalts excellence and promotes industry. Uncle Bola wrote: “Obafemi Awolowo and his Tribune have no place for lazy writers or those who could not research whatever they wrote. Every one of us who writes for or in the Tribune must never forget this, especially in today’s Nigeria which is befuddled with mediocrity and lack of seriousness.” This explains why we write what we write. Why we publish what we publish. It should also explain why the Tribune refused to die yesterday and won’t die tomorrow. Happy 75th birthday.

Advertisement

News

Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Tells FG To Retaliate Against South African Companies In Nigeria

Published

on

Senator Adams Oshiomhole has called on the Federal Government to retaliate against South African businesses operating in Nigeria following the recent attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

Speaking during plenary on Tuesday, Oshiomhole said the Federal Government should consider revoking the working license of South African owned companies such as MTN and DSTV.

He argued that Nigeria must respond firmly to what he described as persistent hostility against its citizens.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:South Africa To Investigate ‘Mystery’ Of Planeload Of Palestinians

“I am not going to shed tears. If you hit me, I hit you. I think it is appropriate in diplomacy. It is an economic struggle,” Oshiomhole said.

He argued that while some South Africans accuse Nigerians of taking their jobs, Nigerians should return home and take over employment opportunities created by major South African companies operating in the country, including MTN and DSTV.

Advertisement

When we hit back, the President of South Africa will not only talk but will also go on his knees to recognise that Nigeria cannot be intimidated.

READ ALSO:South African Ambassador Found Dead Outside Paris Hotel

We will not condone any life being lost. If a crime has been committed under the South African law they have the right to bring any such person to justice, but to kill our people as if we are helpless, we will not allow that,” Oshiomhole added.

Advertisement

DAILY POST reports that several Nigerians in South Africa have reportedly been attacked, and their businesses destroyed, in ongoing xenophobic attacks in the country.

Continue Reading

News

IGP Orders Officers Display Name Tag On Uniform, Gives Update On State Police

Published

on

The Inspector General of Police, IGP, Tunji Disu, has ordered all police personnel to always have their name tags on their uniforms for easy identification.

Disu disclosed that only police personnel who are undercover are exempted from displaying their name tags.

Speaking on Tuesday, Disu said: “All police officers should have their name tags. All of us on the high table have our names apart from the undercover among us so if you look at all the Commissioners of Police we have our name tags, so it’s not our standard.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:

All the Commissioners of Police are here and that is why we called this meeting, we have list of things like this that we will want to discuss with the Commissioners of Police, we have told them earlier and we will still let them know that every that happens within their area of jurisdiction falls under their control.”

On the issue of state police, the IGP said: “Since we got the signal that the Federal Government of Nigeria intend to establish State Police and since we are the federal police, we decided to take the bull by the horn and put down our own side of what we believe on how the state police should be run.

Advertisement

“A lot of things were taken into consideration, a lot of comparative analysis was done and it has been transmitted to the National Assembly.”

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Court Orders SERAP To Pay DSS Operatives N100m For Defamation

Published

on

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory has ordered a non-governmental organization, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, to pay N100 million as damaged to two operatives of the Department of the State Services, DSS, for unjustly defaming them in some publications.

The court also ordered SERAP to tender public apologies to the defamed officers,
Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, in two national newspapers, two television stations and its website.

Besides, the organization was also ordered to pay the two operatives N1 million as cost of litigation and 10 percent post-judgment interest annually on the judgment sum until it’s fully liquidated.

Advertisement

Justice Yusuf Halilu of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory gave the order on Tuesday while delivering judgment in a N5.5 billion defamation suit instituted against SERAP by the DSS operatives.

The judge found SERAP liable for unjustly defaming the two DSS operatives with allegations that they unlawfully invaded its Abuja office, harassed and intimidated its staff, in September 2024.

READ ALSO:How We Arrested Terror Suspect Who Threatened To Kill Students, Teachers In Abuja — DSS

Advertisement

In the offending publication on its website and Twitter handle, SERAP alleged that the two operatives unlawfully invaded and occupied its office with sinister motives.

The judge held that the publication was in bad taste especially from an organization established to promote transparency and accountability, as nothing in the publication was found to be truthful.

The DSS staff had listed SERAP as 1st defendant in the suit marked CV/4547/2024. SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, was listed as the 2nd defendant.

Advertisement

In the suit, the claimants – Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele – accused the two defendants of making false claims that they invaded SERAP’s Abuja office on September 9, 2024..

Counsel to the DSS, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, had while adopting his final address in the mater urged the judge to grant all the reliefs sought by his client in the interest of justice.

READ ALSO:DSS Arrests Suspected Gunrunner, Recovers 832 Rounds Of Ammunition

Advertisement

He admitted that although the names of the two claimants were not mentioned in the defamation materials, they had however established substantial circumstances that they are the ones referred to in the published defamation article by SERAP on its website.

The counsel submitted that all ingredients of defamation have been clearly established and the offending publication referred to the two officials of the secret police.

However, SERAP, through its counsel, Victoria Bassey from Tayo Oyetibo, SAN, law firm, asked the court to dismiss the suit on the ground that the two claimants did not establish that they were the ones referred to in the alleged defamation materials.

Advertisement

She said that SERAP used “DSS officials” in the alleged offending publication, adding that the two claimants must establish that they are the ones referred to before their case can succeed.

Similar arguments were canvassed by Oluwatosin Adefioye who stood for the second defendant, adding that there was no dispute in the September 9, 2024 operation of DSS in SERAP’s office.

READ ALSO:Alleged Cyberstalking: DSS Plays Video Evidence In Sowore’s Trial

Advertisement

He said that since SERAP in the publication did not name any particular person, the claimants must plead special circumstances that they were the ones referred to as the DSS officials.

Besides, he said that there is no organization by name Department of State Services in law, hence, DSS cannot claim being defamed adding that the only entity known to law is National Security Agency.

The claimants had in the suit stated that the alleged false claim by SERAP has negatively impacted on their reputation.

Advertisement

The DSS also stated, in the statement of claim, that, in line with the agency’s practice of engaging with officials of non-governmental organisations operating in the FCT to establish a relationship with their new leadership, it directed the two officials – John and Ogunleye – to visit SERAP’s office and invite them for a familiarization meeting.

The claimants added that in carrying out the directive, John and Ogunleye paid a friendly visit to SERAP’s office at 18 Bamako Street, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja on September 9 and met with one Ruth, who upon being informed about the purpose of the visit, claimed that none of SERAP’s management staff was in the country and advised that a formal letter of invitation be written by the DSS.

READ ALSO:DSS, Police Partner NCCSALW To End Terrorism, Mop Up Illegal Arms

Advertisement

John and Ogundele, who claimed that their interactions with Ruth were recorded, said before they immediately exited SERAP’s office, Ruth promised to inform her organisation’s management about the visit and volunteered a phone number – 08160537202.

They said it was surprising that, shortly after their visit, SERAP posted on its X (Twitter) handle – @SERAPNigeria – that officers of the DSS are presently unlawfully occupying its office.

The claimant added, “On the same day, the defendants also published a statement on SERAP’s website, which was widely reported by several media outfits, falsely alleging that some officers from the DSS, described as “a tall, large, dark-skinned woman” and “a slim, dark skinned man,” invaded their Abuja office and interrogated the staff of the first defendant (SERAP).

Advertisement

John and Ogundele stated that “due to the false statements published by the defendants, the DSS has been ridiculed and criticised by international agencies such as the Amnesty International and prominent members of the Nigerian society, such as Femi Falana (SAN)”.

“Due to the false statements published by the defendants, members of the public and the international community formed the opinion that the Federal Government is using the DSS to harass the defendants.”

READ ALSO:SERAP To Court: Stop CBN From ‘Implementing ‘Unlawful, Unjust ATM Fee Hike’

Advertisement

They added that the defendants’ statements caused harm to their reputation because the staff and management of the DSS have formed the opinion that the claimants did not follow orders and carried out an unsanctioned operation and are therefore, incompetent and unprofessional.

The claimants therefore prayed the court for the following reliefs: “An order directing the defendants to tender an apology to the claimants via the first defendant’s (SERAP’s) website, X (twitter) handle, two national daily newspapers (Punch and Vanguard) and two national news television stations (Arise Television and Channels Television) for falsely accusing the claimants of unlawfully invading the first defendant’s office and interrogating the first defendant’s staff.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N5 billion as damages for the libellous statements published about the claimants.

Advertisement

“Interest on the sum of N5b at the rate of 10 percent per annum from the date of judgment until the judgment sum is realised or liquidated.

“An order directing the defendants to pay the claimants the sum of N50 million as costs of this action.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending