Headline
German Caution On Arms To Ukraine Rooted In History, Energy

Germany’s refusal to join other NATO members in providing weapons to Ukraine has annoyed some allies and raised questions about Berlin’s resolve in standing up to Russia.
The issue rose to the fore over the weekend following a report that Berlin had gone so far as to block Estonia from supplying old German howitzers to Kyiv to help defend itself against Russian troops massing near the Ukrainian border.
Germany’s stance on arms supplies does “not correspond to the level of our relations and the current security situation,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said on Twitter.
Speaking to reporters Monday in Berlin, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz denied a decision had been made on the howitzers and insisted that his country stands with its NATO and European Union allies in opposing any Russian incursion into Ukraine.
“Should this situation occur, we will jointly act,” he told reporters. “There would be a high price.”
Still, while Germany would continue to provide help to Ukraine, there would be one exception, he said: “We don’t provide any lethal weapons.”
READ ALSO: Biden Caught On Hot Mic Swearing At Fox News Reporter
That stance, criticized in Kyiv and — less loudly — in Washington and London, has caused consternation among some in Germany who worry that their country may not be considered a reliable partner.
“How many in Berlin are actually aware how our seemingly confused Ukraine policy harms not just (Germany) but the entire EU?” asked Wolfgang Ischinger, Germany’s former ambassador to the United States and now head of the annual Munich Security Conference.
Experts say Germany’s position is partly rooted in its history of aggression during the 20th century.
“There’s the obvious legacy of Germany’s own militarization in Europe during two World Wars that has led many German leaders to view any military response as the last resort,” said Rachel Ellehuus, deputy director of the Europe, Russia and Eurasia program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
That attitude could backfire, she said. “The current government does not seem to grasp that sending defensive weapons to Ukraine might actually deter further Russian aggression.”
And while Germany has pointed to its restrictive position on arms exports to conflict zones in the past, analysts say the rule has not been consistently applied.
“There have always been borderline cases here, such as the Kosovo war or support for the Kurds against IS in Syria,” said Sabine Fischer, a senior Russia expert at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
The debate over German weapons is unfolding days after the head of the German navy resigned following criticism at home and abroad for comments he made on Ukraine and Russia. Speaking Friday in India, Vice Admiral Kay-Achim Schoenbach said it was important to have Russia on the same side as the EU against China and suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin deserved “respect.”
With Scholz’s Social Democrats are steeped in the legacy of Cold War rapprochement pursued by his predecessor Willy Brandt, his governing partner the Greens are rooted in a tradition of pacifism. That means two out of Germany’s three governing parties would balk at the idea of supplying arms to a non-NATO country in a conflict with Russia. But letting Estonia pass on the old Soviet-designed 122-mm D-30 howitzers to Ukraine might be an acceptable compromise.
READ ALSO: Biden Caught On Hot Mic Swearing At Fox News Reporter
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock made clear that, qualms about exporting arms to Ukraine aside, Berlin takes a dim view of Russia’s recent behavior.
“In recent weeks, more than 100,000 Russian troops with tanks and guns have gathered near Ukraine for no understandable reason. And it’s hard not to see that as a threat,” she said during a visit to Moscow.
Speaking alongside her Russian counterpart, Baerbock acknowledged the “suffering and destruction that we Germans brought upon the peoples of the Soviet Union” during the Nazi era, but warned that Germany was willing to consider tough steps if Russia acts against Ukraine.
This includes calling into question the future of the new Nord Stream 2 pipeline meant to bring natural gas from Russia to Germany.
Such a move against its biggest energy supplier would come at a high price for Germany, too.
With plans to switch off its last three nuclear power plants this year and phase out the use of coal by 2030, Germany’s reliance on gas will increase in the short term until enough renewable energy comes online, said Georg Zachmann, a senior fellow at the Bruegel economic think tank in Brussels.
Yet German officials believe that being a large customer of Russian gas can give it leverage, as Moscow won’t want to harm its reputation as a reliable supplier.
Germany’s neighbors, however, aren’t convinced that tactic will work.
“For almost three decades, Germany has been pushing for a more inclusive approach to Russia based on the Wandel durch Handel (change through trade) approach. But it didn’t change Russia,” said Slawomir Debski, director of the Polish Institute of International Affairs, a think tank in Warsaw.
But the bickering now among NATO and EU allies doesn’t help either, he said.
If Berlin wants to focus on putting economic pressure on Moscow while others provide military aid to Ukraine, such a ‘good cop, bad cop’ approach could work, said Debski, “provided there is part of an agreed allied strategy and agreement on the fundamental endgame.”
READ ALSO: Guns Selling Out As US Residents Panic-buy Weapons Ahead Biden Inauguration
Speaking Monday at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels, Baerbock said the German government’s priority is to deescalate the situation over Ukraine, dampening allies’ calls for military support to Kyiv and swift new sanctions against Moscow.
“Berlin will have to deal with the criticism that is now coming from Ukraine, other European countries and Washington,” Fischer said.
“At the same time, Germany remains an important player in the negotiations surrounding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and, I predict, will continue to support sanctions and other measures in the future.”
AP
Headline
UK Supported US Mission To Seize Russian-flagged Oil Tanker – Defense Ministry

The British Ministry of Defence said on Wednesday that it provided support to the United States in its operation to seize a Russian-flagged oil tanker in the North Atlantic.
US seized the tanker, which was being shadowed by a Russian submarine on Wednesday, after pursuing it for more than two weeks across the Atlantic as part of Washington’s efforts to block Venezuelan oil exports.
According to Britain, its armed forces gave pre-planned operational support, including basing following a US request for assistance.
READ ALSO:UK Introduces Powers To Seize Phones, SIM Cards From Illegal Migrants
The UK also said a military vessel provided support for the US forces pursuing the tanker, and the Royal Air Force provided surveillance support from the air.
Defence Secretary John Healey stated that the operation targeted a vessel with a nefarious history linked to Russian and Iranian sanctions evasion networks.
“This action formed part of global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting,” he said in a statement.
READ ALSO:Venezuelan Deportees: US Embassy Gives Reason For Reducing Visa Validity For Nigerians
According to him, the US was Britain’s closest defence and security partner.
“The depth of our defence relationship with the US is an essential part of our security, and today’s seamlessly executed operation shows just how well this works in practice,” he added.
The British government said that the Bella-1 tanker, now renamed Marinera, is sanctioned by the US under its counter-Iran sanctions,
The MoD statement said the support was provided in full compliance with international law.
Headline
Russia Deploys Navy To Guard Venezuelan Oil Tanker Chased By US In Atlantic

Russia has deployed naval assets to escort a sanctioned oil tanker across the Atlantic following reported moves by the United States to seize the vessel.
US forces were said to be preparing to board the ship, which has a history of transporting Venezuelan crude oil and was last believed to be sailing between Scotland and Iceland.
CBS News reported that Russia stepped in to protect the tanker, raising the prospect of a direct confrontation between the two powers at sea.
READ ALSO:Russia Calls up 135,000 Military Personnel
By sending naval ships into the North Atlantic, Russian President Vladimir Putin is signalling to United States President Donald Trump that any US action would carry consequences, coming after the US president threatened that he might use the military to seize Greenland.
The tanker, currently empty, previously operated under the name Bella 1. Last month, the US Coast Guard attempted to board it in the Caribbean with a warrant over alleged breaches of US sanctions and claims that it had shipped Iranian oil.
The vessel later changed course, renamed itself Marinera and reportedly reflagged from Guyana to Russia.
READ ALSO:Venezuela Frees Eight Opposition Leaders
Trump last month said he had ordered a ‘blockade’ of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, a policy the government in Caracas branded ‘theft’.
Ahead of the US seizure of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro on Saturday, Trump accused the country’s government of using ships to smuggle drugs into the United States.
Two US officials told CBS News on Tuesday that American forces were planning to board the Marinera, adding that Washington would prefer to seize the tanker rather than sink it.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry said it expects Western countries to respect principles of freedom of navigation.
(Daily Mail News)
Headline
UK Introduces Powers To Seize Phones, SIM Cards From Illegal Migrants

The United Kingdom has rolled out expanded enforcement powers allowing authorities to confiscate mobile phones and SIM cards from migrants who enter the country illegally.
The new measures, which do not require an arrest, came into force on Monday at the Manston migrant processing centre in Kent and represent a significant tightening of border controls.
According to the Home Office, the powers are intended to support intelligence-gathering operations aimed at disrupting criminal networks that organise and profit from dangerous Channel crossings.
Officials at the centre are equipped with technology that enables them to extract and analyse data from seized devices, a move the government says will help track and dismantle smuggling rings.
READ ALSO:Russia-Ukraine War: Pope Leo Calls For Global Christmas Truce
Under the revised rules, migrants are permitted to be asked to remove outer garments if there is suspicion that phones are being concealed.
In certain circumstances, officers may also check mouths for hidden SIM cards or small electronic items.
The National Crime Agency said information recovered from devices could accelerate investigations and improve the effectiveness of action against organised crime groups.
Border Security Minister Alex Norris said the policy was necessary to regain control of the UK’s borders and confront human trafficking operations.
“We are committed to restoring order and tackling the people-smuggling gangs behind this lethal trade,” Norris said.
READ ALSO:
“These stronger laws give authorities the tools to disrupt, intercept and dismantle these networks more quickly and effectively,” he added.
The legislation also introduces tougher criminal penalties linked to illegal crossings.
Individuals found storing or supplying boat engines for unauthorised journeys could face prison terms of up to 14 years, while those involved in researching equipment or plotting routes may be liable to sentences of up to five years.
Government officials stressed that the powers would be exercised with discretion.
READ ALSO:UK Unveils Record-breaking Bid For 2035 Women’s World Cup
The Minister for Migration and Citizenship, Mike Tapp, said devices could be returned depending on individual circumstances and the relevance of the information obtained.
“If a device may contain intelligence that helps combat smuggling, it is right that it can be seized,” Tapp said, adding that the approach would not undermine compassion toward migrants.
However, humanitarian organisations have expressed unease about the impact of the policy.
The Refugee Council warned that mobile phones often serve as vital lifelines for migrants, enabling contact with family members and access to support services, and urged authorities to ensure the measures are applied in a proportionate and humane manner.
News3 days agoWhat I Saw After A Lady Undressed Herself — Pastor Adeboye
Headline3 days agoPROPHECY: Primate Ayodele Reveals Trump’s Plot Against Tinubu
Metro3 days agoArmed Robbers Shot PoS Operator To Death In Edo
Metro2 days agoAAU Disowns Students Over Protest
Metro2 days agoNine Soldiers Feared Dead In Borno IED Explosion
Business2 days agoNNPCL Reduces Fuel Price Again
Metro3 days agoJoint Task Force Kills 23 Bandits Fleeing Kano After Attacks
Politics3 days ago2027: Rivers APC Pledges To Follow Wike’s Instructions
Metro2 days agoEdo: Suspected Kidnappers Kill Victim, Hold On To Elder Brother
Entertainment3 days agoPHOTOS: Anthony Joshua Makes First Social Media Post After Surviving Deadly Car Crash










