Connect with us

News

OPINION: The Politics Of Protest In Nigeria [Nation’s Pulse]

Published

on

By Israel Adebiyi

Nigeria is a paradox wrapped in pain and promise — a country with vast resources, fertile soil, and brilliant minds, yet locked in the chains of systemic failure and elite manipulation. Milk and honey may flow across its landscapes, but the people remain hungry — not for food alone, but for justice, dignity, and a government that works.

Advertisement

Why is it that a nation so blessed seems to curse its people with poverty, insecurity, and hopelessness? Apathy? Maybe. Complicity? Definitely.

The truth is, many Nigerians have stopped holding their leaders accountable. Some are simply waiting for their turn at the table of loot, convinced that justice is no longer a collective pursuit but a personal ambition. Yet, there remains a vast population of everyday Nigerians who wake up each day to survive — not thrive. These are the people with every reason to protest. If not for today, then for tomorrow’s children, who risk inheriting a more broken nation than the one we live in now.

The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) grants every citizen the right to peaceful assembly and protest. Section 40 explicitly states: “Every person shall be entitled to assemble freely and associate with other persons…” More so, Section 14(2)(b) is unambiguous about the purpose of government: “The security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.”

Advertisement

If the government fails in this duty — and it has, tragically and consistently — then the people are not only justified to protest; they are obligated to.

READ ALSO: OPINION: Tinubu Is The Law!

But what do we see instead? We see silence — not the silence of peace but the silence of resignation. We hear nothing from the elite whose mouths are full but consciences hollow. These are the ones who dine with oppressors but ask the oppressed to “show understanding.” Understanding for what, exactly? For rising food prices? For fuel subsidies that vanish into thin air? For lives lost in Plateau, Benue, Zamfara and countless unreported communities across Nigeria?

Advertisement

And when voices dare to rise, when the streets start to stir, when placards are raised, what happens?

Another crowd appears — not in solidarity, but in opposition. Paid counter-protesters. Men and women bought for the price of a meal, waving banners that defend the very system crushing them. This is the politics of protest in Nigeria: a tragic theatre where hunger is weaponized, and voices are drowned in a sea of rented noise.

On Monday, April 7, 2025, young demonstrators under the banner of the Take-It-Back Movement defied police orders and took to the streets in Abuja, Lagos, Oyo, Rivers, and other states. Clad in signature orange berets, these protesters sang solidarity songs as they marched through major roads, demanding better governance and the fulfillment of Nigeria’s democratic promise.

Advertisement

Their defiance came despite a warning from the Nigeria Police Force, which labeled their protest “ill-conceived and mischievous.” Unsurprisingly, turnout was low. More disturbingly, police officers—who ought to protect peaceful demonstrators—unleashed canisters of teargas on them. In Port Harcourt and Abuja, protesters scattered in panic. Sadly, this is nothing new in a nation where dissent is often treated as a threat rather than a right.

READ ALSO: OPINION: Tinubu, Atiku And The Lion’s Share [Monday Lines 2]

Nigeria is no stranger to protest. Our history is marked by brave men and women who rose against oppression: the Aba Women’s Riot (1929), the Abeokuta Women’s Revolt (1947), the Ali Must Go protests (1978), the anti-SAP riots (1989), the June 12 protests (1993), Occupy Nigeria (2012), End SARS (2020), End Bad Governance (2024), and now the Take-It-Back Movement (2025). Each was a cry for justice — a demand for better governance and dignity.

Advertisement

But with every protest comes a familiar pattern: counter-protests mysteriously spring up, police brutality follows, and then, silence returns.

There is a peculiar madness to the Nigerian situation: citizens who should be protesting against hunger, insecurity, and misgovernance are instead recruited to counter such protests. Sponsored by political actors, these counter-demonstrations are often manned by the very people being plundered. Poverty becomes a currency of control. The politicians understand that controlling the purse means controlling the pulse of the nation.

It’s not uncommon to see protesters sharing cash “appreciation” after an outing. When the promised payment falls short, arguments erupt — sometimes violently — over stipends. This turns a supposed civic action into a spectacle. The powerful know: feed the hunger, and you silence the anger. It is political theatre masked as civil resistance.

Advertisement

How can a people march against poverty in the morning and return in the evening to counter the same protest — cheering the very suffering they denounced? It is not ignorance — it is a system that has made survival more urgent than liberty.

While the poor are manipulated, the elite remain eerily silent. Those who should speak truth to power would rather urge “understanding” — the same understanding that sent their fathers to the grave, unremembered.

We’ve also allowed cultural and religious narratives to dilute our collective courage. “Respect authority,” they say. “Do not rebel against God’s anointed.” But does obedience mean silence in the face of injustice? If our forebears showed this same understanding and retired to their early graves penniless, must we die the same way?

Advertisement

READ ALSO: OPINION: Natahsha’s Apoti Is Not Godswill For Apkabio

Let’s be clear: silence is not spiritual. Submission is not sainthood. A people cannot fear both God and their government — one must give way.

Can Nigeria break free? Can Nigerians demand a system where lawmakers represent us, not themselves? Can we insist that those elected are the best among us, not the wealthiest or most connected? Can we rise above tokenism and stop celebrating crumbs from those who stole the bakery?

Advertisement

The politics may never end — the elite will always find a way to protect their privilege. But the people must become wiser. The price of silence is higher than the risk of protest.

Until Nigerians rise not just in anger but in strategy — not just in numbers but in purpose — we will remain trapped in this vicious cycle of elite manipulation and manufactured consent.

The pulse of this nation beats faintly, but it still beats.

Advertisement

Let us protest — not just with placards but with our voices, our votes, our pens, and our principles. Let us remind those in power that the people are not spectators in the theatre of governance — we are the soul of the nation.

And when the people rise — truly rise — no paid protest, no media spin, no bullet can stop them. The elite must speak louder. And the youth must march — more organized, more informed, and more relentless.

History is watching. And the future is listening.

Advertisement

Until next week, keep your finger on The Nation’s Pulse.

Advertisement

News

W’Cup Qualifiers: Super Eagles Edge Rwanda 1-0 To Revive Qualification Hopes

Published

on

By

In a high-stakes 2026 FIFA World Cup qualifier at the Godswill Akpabio International Stadium in Uyo, Nigeria secured a vital 1–0 victory over Rwanda, breathing new life into their qualification hopes.

The only goal of the match came in the 51st minute when Tolu Arokodare capitalized on a loose ball in the penalty area, slotting it past Rwanda’s goalkeeper to give Nigeria a crucial lead.

Advertisement

The first half ended goalless, with both teams cautious in their approach. Nigeria’s defense, marshalled by Calvin Bassey, held firm despite Rwanda’s tactical shifts in the second half.

READ ALSO:

Nigeria suffered a blow as star striker Victor Osimhen limped off in the first half, replaced by Cyril Dessers. Despite the setback, the Super Eagles maintained pressure to secure the vital win.

Advertisement

The victory moves Nigeria to 10 points from 7 matches in Group C, while Rwanda remains on 8 points, making the race for World Cup qualification even tighter.

Fans reacted passionately on social media platforms, with many praising the team’s resilience and expressing concern over Osimhen’s injury.

Looking ahead, Nigeria will aim to build on this momentum in their upcoming fixtures to secure a spot at the 2026 World Cup.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

NCDC Alerts Nigeria As DR Congo Declares Ebola Outbreak

Published

on

By

The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has issued a public health advisory following the confirmation of a new Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

As of September 4, 2025, the DRC has reported 28 suspected cases and 15 deaths, including four health workers, in the Kasai Province.

Advertisement

The Director-General of NCDC, Dr. Jide Idris, said the agency will continue to monitor the regional and global situations as there are no cases of Ebola virus disease in Nigeria, as of now.

However, the NCDC is taking proactive measures to prevent the spread of the disease, and it is working closely with relevant Ministries, Departments, Agencies, and Partners to strengthen preparedness and response measures in Nigeria.

READ ALSO:Ebola In Uganda: NCDC Ups Preparedness, Cautions Nigerians On Travel

Advertisement

Idris urged Nigerians to practice good hand hygiene by washing their hands regularly with soap under running water or using hand sanitisers. He also advised Nigerians to avoid physical contact with anyone showing symptoms of infection or an unknown diagnosis.

Additionally, individuals should handle animals with gloves and protective clothing, and cook animal products thoroughly to reduce the risk of wildlife-to-human transmission.

Furthermore, people should avoid direct contact with the blood, saliva, vomit, urine, and other bodily fluids of suspected or confirmed EVD cases.

Advertisement

The NCDC advises Nigerian citizens and residents to avoid all but essential travel to countries with confirmed Ebola cases. Those with recent travel history to affected areas who experience symptoms should promptly call the NCDC hotline (6232) or their State Ministry of Health hotline for assessment and testing.

READ ALSO:NCDC Confirms 80 Deaths From 413 Lassa Fever Cases In 11 States

They should also shelter-in-place to avoid further spread through shared transport systems and await dedicated responders for assessment and possible transport to a treatment centre.

Advertisement

The NCDC is strengthening surveillance across the country, including borders and airports, and enhancing laboratory capacities for quick testing of suspected cases.

Idris assured that the agency will continue to provide periodic updates on the situation as the Ebola outbreak in the DRC is caused by the Zaire strain, with a mortality rate estimated at 57%.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has deployed experts to support response efforts, and the DRC has activated its Public Health Emergency Operations Centre.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

5% Fuel Surcharge: What Nigerians Should Know

Published

on

By

File Copy: Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Tax Policy and Fiscal Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele

Confusion has erupted online over a supposed 5% fuel surcharge under Nigeria’s new tax laws, with many fearing a sudden increase in fuel prices.

The chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, on Saturday through a post on X, clarified what is fact and what is fiction.

Advertisement

The controversy arises from the recent passage of the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025, which consolidates and harmonises previous tax laws.

Some social media posts suggested that President Bola Tinubu’s administration had introduced a new surcharge on fuel, sparking public concern.

Oyedele clarified: “The charge is not a new tax introduced by the current administration. The provision already exists under the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (Amendment) Act, 2007. Its restatement in the new Tax Act is for harmonisation and transparency rather than immediate implementation.”

Advertisement

According to Oyedele, the surcharge is meant to fund road infrastructure, an area that has historically suffered from underfunding.

Over the years, Nigeria’s road network has faced chronic maintenance challenges, resulting in potholes, travel delays, and higher vehicle operating costs.

Oyedele further noted that the surcharge is intended to create a dedicated, predictable funding source for road construction and maintenance.

Advertisement

READ ALSO:Nigerian Lawmakers Approve Tinubu Tax Reform Bills

Oyedele addressed key questions raised by citizens:

Will the surcharge start automatically in January 2026?

Advertisement

No. It will only take effect when the Minister of Finance issues an order published in the Official Gazette:

“The surcharge does not take effect automatically with the new tax laws. It will only commence when the Minister of Finance issues an order published in the Official Gazette as stated under Chapter 7 of the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025. This safeguard ensures careful consideration of timing and economic conditions before implementation,” Oyedele stated.

Does it apply to all fuels?

Advertisement

No. Household energy products such as kerosene, LPG, and CNG are exempt. Clean and renewable energy products are also excluded to support Nigeria’s energy transition agenda.

Why maintain the surcharge amid economic hardship?

Oyedele explained that the fund is meant as a dedicated mechanism for road maintenance:

Advertisement

READ ALSO:FG Sues Binance For $81.5bn In Economic Losses, Back Taxes

He said, “The surcharge is designed as a dedicated fund for road infrastructure and maintenance. If implemented effectively, it will provide safer travel conditions, reduce travel time and cost, lower logistics costs and vehicle maintenance expenses, which will benefit the wider economy. This practice is virtually universal with over 150 countries imposing various charges ranging between 20% to 80% of fuel products to guarantee regular investment in road infrastructure.”

Could subsidy savings cover road funding instead?

Advertisement

The Chairman of theCommittee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms said: “While subsidy savings will provide some funding, they are insufficient to meet Nigeria’s huge and recurring road infrastructure needs among other public finance needs. A dedicated fund ensures reliable and predictable financing for roads, complementing the budget and ensuring roads are not left underfunded.”

Does this contradict the tax reform objective of easing citizens’ burden?

READ ALSO:Tax Reform Bills Offer 55% To States In New Sharing Formula

Advertisement

Oyedele reassured: “The reforms have already reduced multiple taxes and removed or suspended several charges that directly affect households and small businesses, such as VAT on fuel, excise tax on telecoms, and the cybersecurity levy. By harmonising earmarked taxes, government is reducing duplication and ensuring a more efficient tax system.”

Why not remove the surcharge entirely?

He clarified: “Yes, the surcharge has been removed from the FERMA Act and incorporated into the new tax laws which are designed to provide a forward-looking legal framework for Nigeria. Keeping this provision in place within a harmonised legal framework ensures Nigeria is prepared to address critical challenges, such as sustainable road financing and even climate change impacts. It is not about immediate implementation, but to ensure the law provides a clear and effective framework for when it becomes necessary in the future.”

Advertisement

In summary, Oyedele stressed that the surcharge is not new, not immediate, and selectively applied. Its inclusion in the law is about transparency, preparedness, and sustainable funding for Nigeria’s roads, and it aims to address long-standing gaps in infrastructure financing.
(PUNCH)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version