Connect with us

News

Presidential Tribunal: Tinubu Tenders 17 Exhibits To Defend His Election Victory

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu, on Tuesday, tendered 17 sets of exhibits in evidence to defend his eligibility to contest the presidential election that was held on February 25.

Tinubu, who maintained that he is the bonafide winner of the presidential contest, through his team of lawyers led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, tendered from the Bar, certified copies of bundles of documentary evidence before the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, sitting in Abuja.

Advertisement

He adduced the evidence to defend the petition the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, filed to nullify his election victory.

Among the exhibits that President Tinubu tendered before the court, included a letter dated February 3, 2003, which the Nigeria Police Force, NPF, wrote to the Consul General of the Embassy of the United States of America, in Nigeria, demanding for his criminal record.

As well as a reply the US Embassy sent to the NPF on February 4, 2003, which indicated that there was no criminal file against him.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Presidential Poll: Tinubu, APC Kick As Court Admits EU’s Report In Evidence

Other bundle of documents that President Tinubu tendered in court on Tuesday, were his academic records from Chicago State University, his travel records between 2012 and 2021, which was certified on July 3, 2023, by the Nigerian Immigration Service, as well as report of the Committee on the location of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT.

More so, President Tinubu tendered Forms EC8A of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, which represented the polling unit results of the presidential election in Kano State, and equally, Forms EC8D(A), which are the summary of results of the election from all the states of the federation.

Advertisement

Also admitted in evidence by the court was the certified true copy of an Originating Summons marked: SC/CV/354/2023, which the Attorneys-General of six PDP controlled states- Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Delta, Edo and Sokoto- filed at the Supreme Court on February 28 to void the outcome of the presidential election.

The last proof of evidence the President tendered in support of his election victory, were certified copies of six newspaper publications.

Whereas INEC and the All Progressives Congress, APC, through their team of lawyers led by Mr. Abubakar Mahmoud, SAN, and Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, respectively, did not oppose the tendering of all the documents, however, Atiku and the PDP, vehemently challenged the admissibility of all the exhibits.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: State Of The Nation: Those Commending Tinubu Are Hypocrites – Cleric

The Petitioners said they would adduce reasons behind their objections, in their final written address.

Meanwhile, despite the objection, the Justice Haruna Tsammani-led five-member panel of the court admitted all the documents in evidence and marked them as Exhibits RA 1 to RA 17.

Advertisement

It will be recalled that INEC had on March 1, announced Tinubu of the ruling APC as winner of the presidential poll, ahead of 17 other candidates that contested the election.

It declared that Tinubu scored a total of 8,794,726 votes to defeat the two major contenders, Atiku of the PDP who came second with a total of 6,984,520 votes and Mr. Peter Obi of the Labour Party, LP, who came third with a total of 6,101,533 votes.

However, dissatisfied with the outcome of the election, both Atiku and Obi, who are separately claiming that they won the presidential contest, approached the court to challenge Tinubu’s victory.

Advertisement

They both prayed the court to withdraw the Certificate of Return that was issued to President Tinubu by INEC.

Specifically, Atiku, in the joint petition he filed with his party, maintained that Tinubu “was at the time of the election, not qualified to contest.”

READ ALSO: Presidential Tribunal Adjourns INEC’s Defence To July 4

Advertisement

He contended that President Tinubu “demonstrated inconsistency as to his actual date of birth, secondary schools he attended (Government College Ibadan); his State of origin, gender, actual name; certificates evidencing Universities attended (Chicago State University).”

According to the petitioners; “The purported degree Certificate of the 2nd Respondent allegedly acquired at the Chicago State University did not belong to him but to a female (F) described as “F” in the Certificate bearing the name Bola Tinubu.

“The 2nd Respondent did not disclose to the 1st Respondent (INEC) his voluntary acquisition of the citizenship of Republic of Guinea with Guinean Passport No. D00001551, in addition to his Nigerian citizenship. The 2nd Respondent is hereby given notice to produce the original copies of his said two passports.”

Advertisement

He argued that the APC candidate did not meet the constitutional threshold and was “constitutionally disabled from contesting for office of President of Federal Republic of Nigeria”.

Besides, Atiku, challenged Tinubu’s eligibility to occupy the presidential seat, alleging that he was previously indicted and fined the sum of $460,000.00 by the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in Case No: 93C 4483, for an offence involving dishonesty and drug trafficking.

The petitioners closed their case after they produced 27 witnesses that testified and tendered documents before the court.

Advertisement

Likewise, INEC closed its defence with a lone witness, thereby, paving the way for Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima, who are 2nd and 3rd Respondents in the matter, to open their own defence to all the allegations.

The Justice Tsammani-led panel adjourned further proceedings in the matter till Wednesday.
VANGUARD

Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments

News

ASUU Directs Members To Begin Nationwide Strike Education

Published

on

…UNIJOS, UniAbuja join strike

The leadership of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has confirmed that a directive has been issued for all branches of the union nationwide to withdraw their services over the delay in the payment of June 2025 salaries to its members, citing the enforcement of “No Pay, No Work” resolution.

ASUU branches in two federal universities, the University of Jos and the University of Abuja, have already commenced strike action in compliance with the directive.

Advertisement

President of ASUU, Prof. Chris Piwuna, who confirmed the development to Tribune Online on Monday in Abuja, said what the institutions are doing is simply enforcing a National Executive Council (NEC) resolution of the union that any month in which salaries are delayed beyond three days, members should withdraw their services until the salaries are paid.

Piwuna lamented the lackadaisical attitude of government officials toward the issue of lecturers’ salaries, which he described as a paltry amount.

He explained that since the migration of university workers from the Integrated Personnel Payroll and Information System (IPPIS) to the Government Integrated Financial Management Information System (GIFMIS), union members have experienced significant hardship due to salary delays.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: 10 Die In Ogun Night Bus Crash

He disclosed that the leadership of the union has engaged relevant government officials, including the Minister of Education and the Accountant General of the Federation, without any positive result. Hence, the ASUU NEC resolved to enforce the “No Pay, No Work” policy.

He said: “What they are doing is just enforcing a NEC resolution. We have agreed at NEC that our members are going through a lot since our migration out of the Integrated Personnel Payroll and Information System. Certainly, our salaries are delayed for a week and sometimes 10 days before our members receive the paltry amount we get to help us carry out our duties well.

Advertisement

“Therefore, we agreed that if there is no pay, there will be no work,” Piwuna said.

On whether other universities are joining the strike action, the ASUU President said all institutions that have not been paid are expected to withdraw their services, insisting that this was the resolution at NEC and the only way to address the challenge, which he noted is being deliberately caused by some government officials, especially at the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation.

He said any institution that has not been paid will join the action because “we are tired of talking about this.”

Advertisement

“We have spoken to the relevant authorities—the minister is aware, the Office of the Accountant General is aware. All those concerned are aware that this thing has been happening. We’ve had meetings with them to express our dissatisfaction with the way our salaries are being paid, and they have not taken any action. We want to work, but we cannot because they have not allowed us to work,” he stated.

READ ALSO: Tragedy As Navy Boat Capsizes After Free Medical Outreach In Delta

Piwuna maintained that the government has no genuine reason for the delay in salary payments because the platform used for payments has no issues.

Advertisement

According to him, when the money finally gets to the universities, nobody has complained of being underpaid or not receiving their salary.

So, the platform through which the payment is effected has not been the problem. It’s just a deliberate effort by the Office of the Accountant General to delay the release of the funds. The platform is working well, but those who make it work are not willing to make it work. We think it’s a deliberate act; that is the point we are making,” the ASUU President added.

He, however, noted that the issue of salary delays is the immediate challenge facing union members and warned that the outstanding N10 billion Earned Academic Allowance (EAA) should be released promptly by the government to avoid another round of struggle.

Advertisement

He noted that the Federal Government was supposed to pay lecturers N50 billion in outstanding EAA but only released N40 billion, leaving a balance of N10 billion.

READ ALSO: FG To Spend N17bn On Lagos Bridge Damaged By Fire

On the EAA you talked about, the total amount was N50 billion, and what they gave to us is N40 billion. N10 billion is still outstanding. We hope that this is paid quickly so that we do not have to fight over it,” the ASUU President said.

Advertisement

Chairman of the University of Jos branch of ASUU, Jurbe Molwus, had announced the withdrawal of services by members of the union at the university, citing the delay in the payment of their June 2025 salaries.

Molwus said this followed the National Executive Council resolution directing branches to take action when salaries are not paid by the third day of a new month, and the congress affirming the position. He said union members have abstained from lectures and statutory meetings.

The chairman stated further that any time salaries are not paid by the third day of the month, there would be a continuous withdrawal of services by the lecturers.

Advertisement

He also said the strike monitoring team of the branch had been activated to ensure compliance.

Members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), University of Abuja branch, have also withdrawn their services on Monday as a result of the delay in the payment of their June 2025 salaries, Nigerian Tribune has gathered.

Chairman of the UniAbuja branch of ASUU, Dr. Sylvanus Ugoh, did not return calls to confirm the strike action by his members.

Advertisement

The spokesperson of the University of Abuja, Dr. Habib Yakoob, when contacted, however said he was not in a position to speak on the issue and advised that the question be directed to the branch chairman of ASUU.

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: FG Officially Releases Age Limit For Admission Into Tertiary Institutions

Published

on

The federal government has officially pegged entry admission year into the nation’s tertiary institutions at age 16.

This came as the government warned that any admission conducted outside of the Central Admission Processing System, CAPS, would be illegal and perpetrators would be prosecuted.

Advertisement

Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, said this on Tuesday while declaring open the ongoing Policy Meeting of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board, JAMB, in Abuja.

READ ALSO: From 158 To 351: Lagos Teen Excels In UTME After Initial Glitch

He warned that the heads of institutions found to be engaged in admission fraud would face prosecution.

Advertisement

Alausa declared that the official age of 16 set by the government is not negotiable.

Details coming…

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

OPINION: APC’s Leprosy Versus ADC’s Scabies

Published

on

By Suyi Ayodele

When an elderly supporter of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu tried to start a conversation about the opposition coalition party, African Democratic Congress (ADC), its membership and the ‘betrayal’ by the Acting National Secretary of the party, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, I politely turned down the conversation. Rather, I referred him to one of the lessons we learnt in our days about Ikú (Death) and how he lost the power to kill all princes.

Advertisement

The short story is clear in my head. I cannot remember the exact Ifa verse that speaks to the story, but I know it is derived from Òyèkú Méjì, the second biggest Odù, one of the 16 corpus of Ifá. The story is about the wife of Ikú called Olójòùngbodo and how she sold out her husband.

Worried about how Ikú was going about killing other people’s children, the elders of the community sat down to find a solution to the problem. Ikú had killed all the princes in the land leaving only Ayùnré. Should Ayùnré die, there would be no prince to be crowned Oba, and the kingdom will go into extinction. So, the elders took counsel and concluded that the woman’s pant is the closest item to her way of life, and decided that they would entice Olójòùngbodo, Ikú’s wife.

Early in the morning, the time of the morning my people call ìjímùjí (when one can barely see the lines on one’s palm), they sent some elders to meet Olójòùngbodo with gifts. The woman crawled out of her husband’s bed and met with the elders. She accepted the precious gifts and asked them what they wanted. The elders said they needed to know those food items that were forbidden to Ikú.

Advertisement

Without wasting time, Olójòùngbodo told them that her husband, Ikú, must not eat eku (rat), eja (fish), and a kind of vegetable known as ebòlò (very green with sweet aroma). The elders added more gifts and went away.

A few days later, the community called for a feast. All the elders were invited. Ikú was given a special table. He felt good by the special treatment. Two beautiful virgins were asked to serve him. Ikú savoured the delicacies given to him in the best carved calabashes. He ate, drank enough palm wine, belched and gave the closing remarks. Then he departed. The elders waited.

When the day for Ikú to kill Ayùnré came, the entire town was on edge. Morning came, and afternoon followed. It was dusk and the sun set. Yet nothing happened. The night crept in and there was no wailing from the palace. Prince Ayùnré was hale and hearty. Then another day broke, and the elders rejoiced, the people rolled out the drums; it was a celebration galore. The people rescued their kingdom from the grips of Death. They sustained the throne and the kingship lineage as Ikú could no longer kill the crown prince.

Advertisement

Permit me for reliving my childhood countryside years here. There were many lessons learnt; many of them learnt on the streets. The elders of those years were full of wisdom. They used parables, folktales and proverbs; all elements that combined to sharpen our sense of hermeneutics, to teach us the basic truth about life. The overall effect is that most ‘village boys’ of my era turned out to be streetwise.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: Col. Umar, Tinubu And Sycophants

Being an ará oko (yokel) -a derogatory term to describe someone from the interior- has its own advantages. In fact, one should be proud to be called an ará ìlú òkè (someone from the countryside). Those from the countryside have an edge over the ‘happening’ boys of the urban centres. One of such is that the storm that will fling the urban man is the one the countryside guy will savour as refreshing wind from the excruciating heat!

Advertisement

I draw inspiration from my native background today to counsel President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on the recent happenings in the nation’s political scene. Lasisi Olagunju, while doing a forensic analysis of Zainab Buba Galadima’s interview with Seun Okinbaloye on Saturday, called it a ‘storm’ (see Olagunju’s “From the North, ‘a storm is coming’”, published in the Nigerian Tribune on Monday, July 7, 2025). I see what is coming as being more serious than a storm.

Earlier on Sunday, July 6, 2025, two prolific columnists with the Tribune Titles, Festus Adedayo and Taiwo Adisa (both wrote in Sunday Tribune) dwelt on the same topic using different routes to get to the market of socio-political commentaries. I read Adedayo’s “ADC: Death, Onikoyi and hunter’s pouch”. I juxtaposed it with Adisa’s “APC, ADC, and some unhelpful narratives”, and I added Olagunju’s piece referenced above. Done, I came to Zainab’s conclusion that they “are not good reviews. It is bad; it is really bad.”

Adedayo alluded to ‘Death’ in his headline. I got scared by that name. Death (Ikú), in one of the stories I heard early in life as stated above, was once human, and he is more than the phenomenon that takes people away from the planet earth. Death does more than that; he ends plans, he eclipses people’s visions and aspirations. He is powerful, deadly, vicious, and mean!

Advertisement

But as powerful as Ikú is, he has his flaws, his weaknesses. Death, like most men of power or men-in-power, is also vulnerable. Ancient tradition teaches us that the greatest flaw of Death is his belief that everyone around him loves him and will die for, and with him. How wrong, how shallow Death could be to assume that he cannot be defeated.

Make no mistakes about it. The only Death in Nigeria’s political firmament today is President Tinubu. He is the rallying point for all those who aim to gain political power. He is equally the one-man squad that visits the homes of his enemies with deadly portions. He visited the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and planted seeds of internal destruction there. He went after the Labour Party (LP) and gave them eternal discord. For every seed of wahala Tinubu planted in the opposition, he left enough fertilizer to nourish it. The President has demonstrated, in the last two years, that he has all it takes to ruin the farms of those who share boundaries with him.

But in the last one week, it appears that the owners of the political IOUs are back to collect not only their invested capital but the accruing interests or capital interests. The formation, or rather, the consolidation of the opposition coalition against the re-election bid of Tinubu in 2027 with the coming on board of the ADC last Wednesday appears to be the greatest challenge the Tinubu political dynasty has ever faced in its political odyssey.

Advertisement

The reactions from the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and members of the Tinubu’s government to the ADC coalition reminds me of the old man and the leftover pounded yam. The old man, the saying goes, says he is not pained that someone else ate the leftover pounded yam, but he keeps removing his clothes ready for a fight over the same food he calls useless (kòdùn mí, kòdùn mí, àgbàlagbà únbó èwù ní èèmefà nítorí iyán àná). Many of Tinubu’s ‘friends’ who have spoken against the ADC coalition said that the party would amount to nothing. Ironically, they refuse to rest, eat popcorn and lick ice cream! If the coalition is useless, why bother about it?

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: Recommending Oba Erediauwa To President Tinubu

One of the narratives against the coalition is the aspersions cast on the person of the Acting National Secretary of the ADC, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola. Today, Aregbesola is regarded as a betrayer and a Yoruba outcast. In all honesty, no one in his right mind will lift a finger in defence of Aregbesola. He is not alone. I find it appalling that any common man would want to defend any politician given what these locusts have done to our collective wellbeing as a people!

Advertisement

I shared the Ikú story above with the elderly Tinubu man. I told him that Aregbesola should be one of their least worries. Rather, Tinubu and his men should look inwards. How many Aregbesola are in the house? How many Olójòùngbodo are sharing the same bed with the Jagaban? If indeed Aregbesola is a betrayer, can we ask Ikú (Tinubu) what he was doing, and where he was, when his wife crawled out of his bed to meet with the enemies?

Ikú, in Yoruba cosmology, is a very rich deity. This is why they say a kìí wá orí tì nílé Ikú (heads are not in short supply in Ikú’s abode). If that is so, what did Tinubu deny Aregbesola such that the enemies could entice him with gifts to join the coalition? The Ikú fable teaches us that every strongman must pay attention to his household. This is what Tinubu should do instead of listening to the clappers telling him that the coalition is nothing.

Again, Tinubu should also know that it is not every prince that Death can kill. When Tinubu, like Ikú, went after the opposition and decimated them with governors being compelled to join the APC, what did he expect? That the people would sit by and allow him to run Nigeria to a one-party State? What type of strategy is that; one that will leave nothing even for the fowls of the air to glean and eat? When APC was displaying that sense of rapacity for power, did it not expect a reaction from the people? What Tinubu is getting today from the ADC is exactly what the people of yore did when Ikú killed all the princes of the land but one! Our elders are right when they posit that the owner of the hut will not allow it to be pulled down by hostile neighbours.

Advertisement

And if we may go down a bit, what is ADC doing today or going to do tomorrow that the APC did not do in the past? Before Tinubu became the sole proprietor of the APC, did he not betray a whole clan? Where is Afenifere today? Where are the founding fathers of the defunct Alliance for Democracy (AD)? How did AD die, or who pierced the heart of the party with the long poisonous knife of betrayal? How many former loyalists of President Tinubu are in some nondescript corners today licking their wounds?

It is rather unfortunate that Nigeria is at a stage when the likes of Aregbesola, Rotimi Amaechi, Atiku Abubakar, Nasir el-Rufai and other hawks are the topics of discourse in our political system. That itself is a big shame! But when you have two terrible items to choose from, is it not true that the people will look for the lesser of the evils?

Ask me a million times. I will tell you that the APC and its twin evil brother, the ADC, are leprosy and scabies. And this again, reminds me of one of the songs by the hunters during rites of passage for a departed hunter (Eré ìsípa ode) about leprosy and scabies.

Advertisement

During those dirge possessions, especially when it got dark, the lead chanter would warn that the non-initiates should retire home as the hunters’ masquerade had nothing good to offer. Once the chief chanter raised the song: Èté òhun èyi, abiyamo yàn kàn h’ómo rè (between leprosy and scabies, let mothers choose one for their children), we knew that the time to go home had come.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: The Genocide In Benue

This is the exact song the political class is singing for Nigerians today. The choices before us as represented by the ruling APC and the coalition ADC, are leprosy and scabies. My elders say the gun births no good child because just as the pellet kills, the bullet kills also. Either APC or ADC, it is the same skin of the cobra; it cannot be used to sew waist amulets (awo oká ni, kò seé rán ìbànté)!

Advertisement

However, one beautiful thing about the ADC to me is the way the David Mark group has left the moribund PDP for the former governor of Rivers State and current Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FTC), Nyesom Wike. Like my former boss is wont to say the thing sweet my belle!

Now, Wike has the entire PDP to play with. The coalition has solved the problem of the despicable promise to remain in the PDP and work for Tinubu in 2027 for him! What a man, what a character! Since the ADC unveiled its plan on Wednesday last week, Wike has been running here and there like Sisyphus in Hades, bashing, castigating and insulting every leader of the group. Wike, like the proverbial dog with skin rashes, has spoken against the coalition more than the APC Itself. There are no names he has not called those behind the coalition. Yet he says the coalition will fail! Shouldn’t Wike be happy that he has succeeded in taking over the PDP; why is he whining by the nanosecond like a common egbére (goblin)?

This is one of the problems I think President Tinubu should address as he navigates the political terrain ahead of 2027. My late mother, God repose her soul, had a saying: “Ajá tó je omo è, a kìí té òkú tìí (you don’t ask a dog that eats its puppy to guard a corpse). If Tinubu and his supporters are looking for betrayers, let them look inwards. A man who could bring the political party that gave him life to its knees would not blink twice before doing-in a mere generous benefactor like Tinubu. As an elder, the President should know that the house built with spittle will be wrecked by dew!

Advertisement

I recommend that Tinubu should watch the Zainab interview. He should listen to the lady speak directly. The president should not rely on any executive summary of the interview by any of his aides. He has a lot to benefit from it. The material is not the usual stuff from the Villa’s lying band; it is different from what any of the bootlickers around him in Aso Rock can offer

Zainab Buba Galadima warned that 2027 “is going to be the toughest battle he (Tinubu) will ever see. It is going to be the toughest.” I have no point to counter that. The only addition here is that it should not be lost on us that neither the coalition nor the APC is fighting for the welfare of the common man. Looking at the characters in both the APC and the ADC, one will easily conclude that the only unifying factor here is intrigue (rìkísí pa wón pò, wón di òré).

The opera season has opened. Nigerians should just locate the nearest popcorn sellers and ice cream joints, buy bagful and watch the unfolding season films. Then they can decide which one they prefer: the current leprosy or the coming scabies.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending