News
20 Governors Borrow Fresh N446bn As Revenues Tumble

Debt servicing costs incurred by 29 state governments consumed 80.7 per cent of their Internally Generated Revenue during the first six months of 2024, highlighting the significant financial burden the sub-nationals currently face, according to The PUNCH.
The dire situation also forced the governors to borrow a total sum of N446.29 billion within the same period despite a 40 per cent increase in its statutory allocation from the Federation Account.
The latest information is according to an analysis of data obtained by our correspondent using the budget implementation reports from each state’s website and Open Nigerian States. This BudgIT-backed website serves as a repository of government budget data.
The performance report is prepared quarterly and issued within four weeks from the end of each quarter.
This heavy burden underscores a critical issue in fiscal management, as the vast majority of the revenue that states could otherwise allocate to essential public services and development projects is being diverted to meet debt obligations.
It also reveals the severe constraints faced by state governments in managing their debt burdens inherited from previous administrations and addressing the needs of their residents.
Nigerians had hoped that with an increased statutory allocation of 40 per cent from the central government, state governors should have more than enough to fulfill their statutory obligations.
In 2023, state governors got the most FAAC allocations in at least seven years. The rise in FAAC allocations to the three tiers of government, especially states followed the petrol subsidy removal and currency reforms of the current administration.
The reforms have reportedly led to a 40 per cent boost in income. Experts believe the revenue increase should have reduced state governments’ appetite for more borrowing.
Instead, the sub nationals are spending a large chunk on repaying loans and taking more loans.
Recall report earlier had it that most of the Federal Accounts Allocation Committee funds for Osun, Ondo, Kaduna, and Cross Rivers states will be used in servicing debts this year.
This is because these states currently have a deficit of N10.94bn, N27.72bn, N15.83bn, N10.02bn respectively following debt servicing deductions by FAAC.
With such a large portion of revenue being used to service debt, it becomes increasingly challenging for states to achieve long-term economic stability and improve the quality of life for their residents.
Earlier this year, Kaduna State governor, Uba Sani had complained vehemently about the huge debt burden inherited from previous administrations, lamenting that it had stopped the prompt payment of salaries and more borrowings in the last nine months of his government.
The governor who made this known while addressing a Town Hall Meeting at the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua Hall, stated that his administration inherited a total of $587m, N85bn, and 115 contract liabilities.
READ ALSO: FG, States, LGs Shared N1.2tn In August – FAAC
He said, “Despite the huge debt burden of $587m, N85bn, and 115 contractual liabilities sadly inherited from the previous administration, we remain resolute in steering Kaduna State towards progress and sustainable development. We have conducted a thorough assessment of our situation and are sharpening our focus accordingly.”
The PUNCH had reported that state governors faced an uphill task of stimulating the economies of their respective states after they inherited at least N2.1tn in domestic debts and $1.9bn in external debts from their predecessors.
This was as 22 states spent a total sum of N251.79bn to service debt borrowed by past administrations within nine months of assuming office (July 2023 and March 2024).
The situation also forced the state governments of Ekiti, Cross River, and Ogun to propose a suspension of their foreign debt repayments worth $501m due to severe foreign exchange volatility.
The request, though rejected by FAAC, was part of their efforts to mitigate the heightened debt service burdens, which state officials claimed has significantly hampered their ability to service existing debts.
Experts say the high debt servicing costs leave little room for investment in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and other key areas vital for economic growth and social welfare.
Meanwhile, an analysis of the budget implementation report showed that Akwa-Ibom, Borno, Cross Rivers, Edo, Katsina, and Niger spent between 60 and 80 per cent of their internally generated revenue to repay owed debts.
Also, states as Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Delta, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Jigawa, Enugu, Kebbi, Kwara, Ondo, Osun Zamfara, and Oyo disbursed between 13 and 58 per cent of their revenue for debt servicing
While the amount spent on debt servicing for nine states including Adamawa, Bauchi, Gombe, Imo, Kano, Kogi, Plateau, Taraba, and Yobe exceeded their revenue within the period.
Data for Benue, Nasarawa, Ogun, Rivers, Sokoto, and Kaduna states were not available when this report was filed. Only Lagos State recorded an impressive IGR of N603.71bn while it paid N201.49bn as debt charges.
A state-by-state breakdown indicated that Abia State under the leadership of Governor Alex Otti spent N4.83bn on servicing its debt, while it earned N15.6bn as revenue, representing a ratio of 31 per cent.
Adamawa spent N14.48bn on its debt but earned N5.75bn, recording a deficit of minus 252 per cent, Akwa-Ibom state spent N20.78bn on its servicing but got N31.74bn IGR indicating 65.4 per cent ratio.
Anambra serviced its debt with N4.8bn but got N18.61bn IGR at a ratio of 25.9 per cent. Bauchi got a debt service ratio of minus 42.9 per cent after it earned N3.92bn but spent N16.8bn on servicing. Bayelsa spent N17.84bn on servicing but earned N46.98bn as revenue, indicating a servicing ratio of 38 per cent.
Further analysis of the report indicated Borno spent N7.25bn on debt charges and earned N12.04bn, representing a ratio of 60.2 per cent, Cross Rivers had a debt service ratio of 60.7 per cent after it spent N12.05bn on loans and got N19.86bn IGR.
READ ALSO: 22 States Spent N251bn On Debt Servicing In Nine Months – Report
Delta State’s burden was 58.2 per cent after it spent N39.08bn on reducing its debt and earned N67.05bn within the review period. Ebonyi had a 48.6 per cent debt ratio due to its N5.05bn spending on debt and N10.39bn revenue collection. Edo State under the leadership of Governor Godwin Obaseki spent N22.66bn on servicing and collected N34.44bn as revenue, indicating a debt ratio of 65.8 per cent.
Ekiti had a debt service ratio of 47.9 per cent after it spent N7.85bn on loans and got N16.39bn IGR. Enugu spent N3.49bn on its debt but earned N16.39bn, indicating a 20.6 per cent ratio. Gombe spent N13.07bn on its debt but earned N9.6bn, recording a deficit of minus 136 per cent. Imo State also recorded a deficit of minus 1.10 per cent after it spent N10.68bn on servicing but got N9.69bn as revenue.
Also, Jigawa State spent N1.89bn on servicing while it earned N4.55bn as revenue, representing a ratio of 41.6 per cent. Kano recorded a deficit of minus 244.4 per cent due to N60.02bn expense on debt but collected N24.57bn as revenue.
Katsina had a 77.4 per cent debt ratio due to its N8.14bn spending on debt and N10.51bn revenue collection. Kebbi spent N1.99bn on its loan servicing while it earned N4.79bn as revenue, representing a ratio of 41.6 per cent. Kwara State recorded the lowest debt-to-revenue ratio of 13.9 per cent, and spent N4.87bn on debt charges but collected N35.1bn as revenue.
Kogi spent N12.79bn on servicing and collected N12.75bn as revenue, indicating a debt ratio of minus 1.06 per cent. Niger State recorded a debt ratio of 80.7 per cent due to debt charges of N11.88bn and revenue collection of N14.73bn.
Ondo State recorded a debt to revenue of 52.4 per cent, Osun (43.2 per cent), Oyo (57.2 per cent). Plateau State recorded the highest debt-to-revenue ratio of minus 550.76 per cent, spending N61.23bn on debt charges but collected N11.11bn as revenue. Taraba and Yobe states recorded a deficit of minus 283.5 per cent and 1.16 per cent respectively.
Experts have, however, attributed the significant increase in debt servicing cost partly to the devaluation of the naira, which drove up the cost of servicing foreign debt obligations as the nation grapples with the forex liquidity crisis and exchange rate volatility.
The Director/CEO of the Centre for Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, speaking in an exclusive interview on Sunday, stated that the significant debt servicing cost was adversely impacted by the depreciation of the naira, which caused a decline in its value relative to other currencies.
He noted that the enormous debt burden inherited by the current administration is also straining state finances and impacting its ability to meet major obligations.
Mr Muda said, “The point is that these states inherited a huge burden of debts. The figure mentioned may sound outrageous but is not much when calculated in dollar terms. Multilateral debts are also tied to infrastructural projects and developmental purposes. Borrowing is not in itself bad if it is used for developmental purposes but the burden of debt must not suffocate the state finances and affect its ability to fulfill major obligations.
“Also, those debts are foreign and once the naira depreciates, it affects the level of debt. As they struggle to service it, the level is still going up because of the exchange rate depreciation. With the depreciation of the currency, the burden of servicing those loans has become extremely very heavy. The exchange rate factor is a major challenge in the debt burden of many states.”
READ ALSO: FG Eyes $4.4bn New Loans As Debt Hits N101tn
Government spending has come under increased scrutiny in recent times, particularly in light of the country’s worsening economic challenges.
At different fora, financial experts have also raised concerns about states’ spending on recurrent expenditure, highlighting the need to embrace financial innovations.
A professor of Economics at Babcock University, Segun Ajibola, stated that the enduring problem of high governance expenses had persisted at the state level, with inadequate oversight and accountability resulting in minimal economic benefits for grassroots citizens.
Ajibola, a former president of the Chartered Institute of Bankers, lamented that state assemblies had also abandoned their oversight duties, leaving the state governors to operate with no iota of transparency and accountability.
He said, “The first issue is the perennial complaint about the high cost of governance in Nigeria and at all levels. When you look at these issues, attention is often concentrated on the Federal Government, so the searchlight is always more on the central government. Most often, nobody cares about what is happening in the states and local government, and that is where the problem is.
“There are so many institutional frameworks in place to look at what is happening at the federal level but who cares about the states? The cost of governance in relative terms is even much higher in states than the federal and that is why you hardly feel the impact of governance in most states.
“Only a few states can boost a significant presence in the lives of their people in our states. The state assemblies are expected to conduct oversight functions on the activities of the executives in their respective states, but in reality, how many states are doing that, leaving the executives to be all in all incurring high costs.”
Meanwhile, 20 state governments borrowed a total sum of N446.29bn collectively to address their budget deficits and to cover various expenses, including essential services, infrastructure projects, and operational costs.
The PUNCH findings also revealed that the majority of these loans were sourced from multilateral and international creditors, contrary to the Federal Government’s emphasis on borrowing from the domestic market.
Further analysis showed that Cross Rivers State was among the states that got the highest loan of N121.22bn between January and June. It was followed by Oyo State with N55.36bn loans. Third on the list is Kogi State with loans worth N41.22bn.
Katsina State also obtained loans worth N34.09bn from creditors within the quarter.
Other states including Niger got N34.03bn, Gombe (N32.38bn), Ondo (N20,82bn), Borno (N20.7bn), Bauchi (N19.28bn), Taraba (N20.23bn), Yobe (N10.17bn), Kwara (N10.06bn), Ekiti (N7.94bn), Ebonyi (N6.43bn), Kano (N6.15bn), Abia (N3.37bn), Enugu (N1.39bn).
The states with the least borrowing include Edo (N633.73m), Osun (N250m), and Plateau state with N530.86m loan.
PUNCH
News
Account For N3tn Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells CBN

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has given the governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Olayemi Cardoso, a seven-day ultimatum to account for what it described as “missing or diverted N3 trillion of public funds” cited in the 2022 annual report of the Auditor-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the allegations, published on September 9, 2025, point to major breaches of financial regulations and constitutional provisions.
It urged Cardoso to identify individuals responsible for the alleged diversions and hand them over to the ICPC and EFCC, as well as recover all funds involved.
In a letter dated November 15 and signed by its deputy director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the organisation said the Auditor-General’s findings “suggest grave violations of the public trust, the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended], the CBN Act, and anticorruption standards.”
READ ALSO:SERAP, NGE Drag Niger Gov, NBC To Court Over Radio Station Closure Threat
The group also warned that the alleged violations undermine public confidence in the apex bank.
“These violations have seriously undermined the ability of the CBN to effectively discharge its statutory functions and the public trust and confidence in the bank,” it said.
According to SERAP’s summary of the report, the Auditor-General queried the non-remittance of over N1.4tn operating surplus, failure to recover N629bn paid to “unknown beneficiaries” under the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, and the non-recovery of N784bn in overdue intervention loans.
One of the key portions of the Auditor-General’s report quoted by SERAP states that the CBN “failed to remit over N1 trillion [N1,445,593,400,000.00] of ‘the Federal Government’s portion of operating surplus’ into the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) account.”
READ ALSO:SERAP Sues NNPCL Over Alleged Failure To Account For Missing N825bn, $2.5bn
He also raised concerns over the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, noting that “the numbers of beneficiaries who collected the money are unknown.”
The report further questioned intervention spending, with the Auditor-General saying the bank spent “over N125 billion [N125,374,000,000.00] ‘on questionable intervention activities’” without supporting documents.
SERAP added that the CBN spent over N1.7bn on operational vehicles for the Nigeria Immigration Service, noting the Auditor-General’s remark that the spending was “unjustified because there is no connection with buying operational vehicles for the NIS and the objectives of the CBN.”
The organisation reminded the CBN of its constitutional obligations and insisted that Nigerians “have the right to know the whereabouts of the public funds.”
SERAP said it would take legal action if the bank fails to respond within seven days.
News
Ekweremadu: S’East Leaders Divided Over Planned Transfer To Nigerian Prison

Leaders of top south-eastern groups have expressed divided opinions over the move of the Federal Government to transfer a former Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, from a United Kingdom correctional facility to a Nigerian custodial centre.
While some queried the plan which they said was meant to boost President Bola Tinubu’s 2027 re-election chances, others said motives did not matter.
The embattled senator was convicted in the UK for organ trafficking.
Ekweremadu and his wife, Beatrice, were arrested by the London Metropolitan Police in June 2022 after a man was presented as a cousin to their daughter, Sonia, in an attempt to facilitate a kidney transplant for her.
The incident led to their conviction under the UK Modern Slavery Act in 2023.
While Ekweremadu was sentenced to nine years and eight months in prison, his wife received four years and six months jail term.
Beatrice was released earlier this year and has since returned to Nigeria.
However, President Bola Tinubu sent a high-level delegation to London to discuss the case of the former Deputy Senate President.
READ ALSO:JUST IN: Navy Officer Who Had Altercation With Wike Reportedly Escapes Assassination Attempt
According to The PUNCH, the Federal Government was seeking arrangements that would allow Ekweremadu to serve the remainder of his sentence in Nigeria.
The delegation, led by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar, and the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, met with officials of the UK Ministry of Justice to discuss Ekweremadu’s incarceration and the possibility of allowing him to serve the remainder of his sentence in Nigeria.
Following the meeting, the delegation visited the Nigerian High Commission in London, where the Acting High Commissioner, Ambassador Mohammed Maidugu, received them.
Speaking on the matter with The PUNCH, the President of the Igbo National Council, Chilos Godsent, questioned the motive and timing of the government’s request, warning against what he described as “political manipulation” or “vendetta” disguised as compassion.
He accused former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration of failing to protect Ekweremadu during his legal ordeal in the UK.
Godsent argued that the negligence allowed British authorities to try a sitting senator of the Federal Republic.
READ ALSO:JUST IN: Ekweremadu’s Wife Released From UK Prison, Returns To Nigeria
He said, “There is one thing that is really not clear: are they bringing him back to Nigeria to set him free or bringing him back to put him on trial, or to let him continue his jail term? These things are not really clear.
“That is why people are sceptical that he can be brought back and then, as part of political vendetta, he might be retried, which is not proper. It is better to allow him to serve his term in the UK, where he was found guilty. Why this time, why this election period? It is because they want to use him to play politics.
“Earlier, if the government had put in efforts for him as a citizen of this country to compel the British government, there wouldn’t have been any need for the UK government to try him as a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria when this issue took place. That was negligence on the part of the Nigerian government.”
While commending Tinubu for what they described as a “laudable” plan if the intention was to reintegrate Ekweremadu with his family and community, he cautioned that any attempt to use his return for political ends would be condemned.
He raised doubts about the independence of the Nigerian judiciary, expressing fears that Ekweremadu could become a victim of political retribution if transferred at this time.
Similarly, the President of the Ala-Igbo Development Foundation, Prof. Awuzie Unachukwu, questioned the government’s motive.
He said, “If it is appreciated that Senator Ekweremadu should come back having paid his dues for his offence, why does this same government shy away from releasing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, who was only asking for self-determination for the Igbos?
READ ALSO:Ohanaeze Meets British Envoy Over Ekweremadu, Pleads Leniency
“Nnamdi Kanu deserves immediate release if the action of the government in asking for the return of Senator Ike Ekweremadu is not political or a means of mobilising some influential Igbos like Senator Ekweremadu for the President’s 2027 second-term ambition.”
He commended President Tinubu for initiating steps toward the repatriation of the embattled senator. Unachukwu said: “However, he shouldn’t bring him back to Nigeria to serve a jail term in this dungeon of a prison. He suffered for his crime enough. If he is coming back to Nigeria, it shouldn’t be for a jail term,” Unachukwu added.
But the Deputy President General, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Mazi Okechukwu Isiguzoro, said the move was not politically motivated.
Isiguzoro stated, “Ohanaeze is supporting the President and we are at the forefront to ensure that the President repatriates and rehabilitates him. He is a political leader. The President doesn’t hate the Igbo people. Ekweremadu was instrumental to the release of Nnamdi Kanu in 2017.”
“The senator has paid his dues in the region and to Igbo nation. That move is being applauded by us. Ohanaeze will not tolerate anybody who stands to block this move. If the President thinks bringing Ekweremadu will help him stabilise his re-election in 2027, the South-East has no choice than to support. We must be devoid of politics in issues that regard to ethnic nationalities in Nigeria.”
Expressing a similar opinion, the Abia State Peoples Democratic Party Chairman, Abraham Amah, said there was nothing wrong with any administration taking steps it considered appropriate in the interest of justice, humanitarian consideration, or national responsibility.
He stated that Buhari’s inaction did not invalidate Tinubu’s decision to do so now.
READ ALSO:Ike Ekweremadu’s Son Makes Enugu Commissioners’ List
Amah added that governance was a continuum, and each administration exercised its judgment based on the realities before it.
“The insinuation that the move is driven by politics does not, by itself, make the action improper or undesirable. In matters like this, motives will always be debated, but what ultimately matters is whether the action aligns with national interest, compassion, and due process.
“What is important here is that a Nigerian citizen who has served the country at the highest legislative levels is in a difficult situation, and if the current government believes it can intervene within the confines of the law and diplomatic norms, there is no justification to condemn such an effort,” he said.
Also, the President-General of the Coalition of South East Youth Leaders, Goodluck Ibem, expressed support for the government to facilitate the return of the embattled senator, saying his return was crucial for the rule of law in the country.
He said, “This move is not just about a singular individual; it is about fostering a sense of justice and integrity that resonates deeply within our community. The people of the South East are committed to a future where justice prevails, and we stand firmly behind the Federal Government in its efforts to uphold these values.
“We urge all stakeholders and members of the public to focus on the broader implications of this process. Our collective goal should be the restoration of justice and creating a political environment founded on transparency and accountability.”
FG to revive Nigeria–UK prisoner transfer programme
READ ALSO:Nollywood Actor, Baba Ijesha, Released From Prison After Three Years
Meanwhile, the Federal Government has begun fresh efforts to revive the long-stalled Nigeria–United Kingdom prisoner transfer programme, as part of diplomatic consultations to repatriate Ekweremadu.
Ekweremadu’s case reopened talks about the 2014 Nigeria–UK Prisoner Transfer Agreement, which has remained unimplemented more than a decade after it was signed.
The agreement, signed under former President Goodluck Jonathan and then UK Prime Minister David Cameron, was intended to allow convicted nationals to serve their sentences in their home countries.
To support its implementation, the UK funded the construction of a £700,000, 112-bed wing at the Kirikiri Custodial Centre in Lagos, compliant with United Nations standards.
Despite these arrangements, no prisoner has been transferred under the scheme.
The spokesperson for the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Alkasim AbdulKadir, on Monday told Arise News that discussions with UK authorities to extradite Ekweremadu were still ongoing.
He revealed that a formal request had been submitted for Ekweremadu’s transfer under the existing prisoner exchange framework.
READ ALSO:Ekweremadus Know Fate Today
“Consultations are still ongoing with UK authorities on the matter. An appeal for a prisoner exchange for him to serve the remainder of his term in Nigeria was tabled before the United Kingdom authorities,” AbdulKadir said.
At the 2025 Nigeria–United Kingdom Migration, Justice, and Home Affairs Dialogue held in Abuja on October 8, both nations reaffirmed commitment to reviving the agreement.
The joint communique released after the meeting stated that Nigeria had called for a review of the document to ensure alignment with the Nigerian Correctional Services Act of 2019 and to clarify the process, timelines, and detention conditions for transferred prisoners.
The renewed dialogue follows a visit last year by officials of the UK Ministry of Justice to several Nigerian prisons.
The push to operationalise the prisoner transfer agreement comes as Nigeria continues to face severe overcrowding in its correctional facilities.
Over 70,000 inmates are currently housed across the country, many awaiting trial, while frequent jailbreaks have underscored the strain on the prison system.
To tackle congestion, the Federal Government has inaugurated new correctional centres in Abuja, Kano, Lagos, Port Harcourt, and other parts of the country, including 3,000-capacity facilities across the six geopolitical zones.
Efforts to speak to the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kimiebi Ebienfa, proved abortive as he declined comment.
News
Tinubu Set To Name Envoys – Presidency Sources

President Bola Tinubu is set to appoint ambassadors to the country’s foreign missions in major countries in the coming weeks, top presidency sources have said.
The move comes amid growing public concern that the prolonged absence of substantive envoys has weakened the country’s diplomatic presence abroad, particularly in key strategic countries like the United States amid the alleged Christian genocide row.
Tinubu had in September 2023 recalled all envoys from Nigeria’s missions in 76 embassies, 22 high commissions, and 11 consulates across the world to reassess the country’s foreign policy.
However, the process of appointing new ambassadors has suffered multiple delays more than two years into the current administration.
In the absence of substantive envoys, the missions have since been overseen by chargés d’affaires or senior consular officers.
READ ALSO:OPINION: Pastor Adeboye, Tinubu, Trump And Truth
In April 2025, sources close to the President told The PUNCH that the Federal Government had concluded the vetting of persons nominated to fill the ambassadorial roles, including security and background checks by the relevant agencies.
Tinubu had previously blamed the delay on the complex political considerations involved in making such appointments.
“I couldn’t appoint everybody at once and thank you for your patience. I still have some slots for ambassadorial positions that so many people are craving for. But it’s not easy stitching those names,” he said in September while receiving members of The Buhari Organisation at the Presidential Villa.
Last week, multiple presidency officials said the President had ordered a “final cleanup” of the list ahead of its release.
One of the officials explained that since the President sent the list to the Senate, some people on the list had died, while some were no longer eligible for appointment due to retirement.
READ ALSO:Tinubu Approves 15% Import Duty On Petrol, Diesel
The official said the need for cleanup prompted the Upper Chamber to return the envoy list to the presidency.
Speaking in separate interviews with The PUNCH, top aides privy to the process confirmed that the cleanup was in its final stage and that only envoys for major countries would be appointed.
“The final process is almost completed. The President is committed to making the appointments, and the announcement will come in the next few weeks. I wouldn’t want to specify two. However, only ambassadors to major countries will be appointed,” a source said.
Another senior presidency source said the list would be released before the end of November.
But he declined to give the specific date of the release.
“The President has said they should clean up the list. I’m sure before the end of the month, it should be ready. There’s no point speculating. When it is ready, it will be officially announced,” the official said.
READ ALSO:Atiku Slams Tinubu Over U-turn On Pardon For Convicts
Allocations without envoys
It was gathered that part of the delay in the appointments was linked to the paucity of funds, estimated at $1bn, needed to pay foreign service officials’ arrears, clear backlog of overheads, replace ageing vehicles and renovate embassy buildings.
Earlier in the year, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar, also confirmed the funding constraints, warning that posting envoys without adequate operational resources would be counterproductive.
To address the funding gap, the Federal Government earmarked N2.1bn in the 2025 budget for the posting and return entitlements of ambassadors and officers.
According to The PUNCH, another N53bn was proposed for the renovation of 103 foreign missions, covering chanceries, staff quarters, ambassadors’ residences, office furniture and official vehicles.
The proposed allocations included N554m for Abidjan, N812m for Banjul, N555m for Brazzaville, N558m for Port of Spain, N576m for Caracas, N624m for Kingston, N567m for Libreville, N409m for Buenos Aires and N899m for Niamey, among others.
READ ALSO:Reps Approve Tinubu’s $2.35bn External Loan Request
A letter, dated July 3, 2025, from the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, also revealed that the Tinubu administration released a total of $54m to support the operations of the country’s 103 embassies and high commissions.
According to the document, $46.14m was allocated for overhead costs, $9.58m for personnel costs, and $282,829 for other expenses.
READ ALSO:JUST IN: Tinubu Reverses Maryam Sanda’s Pardon, Convict To Spend Six Years In Jail
However, with the year running out and no substantive ambassadors appointed, there are growing public concerns over what will become of the budgeted allocations for the missions still operating without confirmed envoys.
In October, the House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs summoned Tuggar, and Heads of Missions to appear before it over the utilisation of funds appropriated to Nigeria’s foreign missions in 2025.
The committee, in a letter dated July 24, 2025, and signed by its Chairman, Oluwole Oke, invoked Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) to demand detailed records on how the funds were spent by the various missions.
The Oke-led committee had earlier in the year begun probing a contract scandal involving the alleged mismanagement of $2m earmarked for the renovation of Nigeria’s Permanent Representative’s residence at the United Nations headquarters in New York.
News4 days agoFG Begins Payment Of Three-year Salary Arrears to 1,700 College Teachers
Politics5 days agoBREAKING: Nigerian Senate Approves Tinubu’s N1.15tn Loan Request
News5 days agoBodies Of Terrorists Float In River As Boko Haram Murders 200 ISWAP Fighters [VIDEO]
News4 days agoDefence Minister Reacts Yo Wike–Naval Officer Clash
News5 days agoPAP Begins Second Phase Distribution Of Laptops To Scholarship Beneficiaries
Entertainment3 days agoRegina Daniels Introduced Me To Drugs, She Sleeps With Girls – Co-wife, Charani Alleges
News3 days agoJUST IN: Abuja Airport Shutdown Over Aircraft Incident
News4 days agoNaval Officer In Face-off With Wike Breached The Law — SAN
News5 days ago[JUST IN] Terrorism: Nnamdi Kanu Appeals For Stay Of Proceedings Ahead Of Nov 20 Judgment
News5 days agoOPINION: Wike’s Verbal Diarrhea And Military Might













