Connect with us

News

IBB: He Who Borrows Till The Creditor Forgets [OPINION]

Published

on

By Suyi Ayodele

Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, 1992/1993 academic session. Trendy Professor Adebayo Williams strolled into the class and gave us a term paper to write: “Chaka is a Man sinned against than sinning. Discuss.” Our teacher strolled off.

Professor Williams is a lecturer of delight. He taught my set Literary Criticism in our final year at the university. One of the classics we read for the course is Thomas Mofolo’s “Chaka.” The term paper is about Mofolo’s protagonist, Chaka, a pure-A-heroic character in pure oral characterisation. As Professor Williams strolled off, he left behind a group of rascals shouting, ‘Baba Aro’! What did he want us to write; ‘wicked’ lecturer? We attempted the paper based on our intelligence then. Williams scored every student and then came back to lecture us!

Advertisement

Two weeks later, Professor Williams returned to ‘dissect’ the term paper. The summary of the discourse is that every dictator comes across playing the victim! He passes to the audience, the people, the picture of a victim. And he gains their sympathy more than anyone else. That is what IBB did on our collective sensibilities last week in Abuja.

The legend of a rich man, Olówó-Etí-Ureje (the rich man by the bank of the Ureje River), aptly describes what retired General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) depicts in his memoir, “A Journey in Service.” The book of tales was launched in Abuja last Thursday. It is a book every lover of history ought to have. I paid through the nose to get a hardcover copy last Friday, less than 24 hours after it was launched.

Love him or hate him; IBB remains the darling of any discerning mind; any day, anytime! It must be so because the man his friends and foes call the Evil Genius is one person whose personality we cannot ignore. The aura around him is infectious. He has presence, he has candour, even if he is on the negative side of history.

Advertisement

IBB equally has humour, just as he has a good control of the English Language. He is a great non-acerbic polemicist. That’s a contrast; yes! Same way he says being called ‘Evil Genius’ “is a contradiction” because “You can’t simultaneously be a genius and an evil” (Pg 353). A man who laughs off virtually everything is someone one should be wary of; IBB is that man! He tells you he doesn’t join issues with his subordinates, nor does he engage his superiors. What does he do then, you may ask!

The self-styled Military President has never made any mistake about his audience. He demonstrated that in Abuja last Thursday. Only an Evil Genius has the capacity to assemble the figures that gathered for the book launch last week. Only Maradona, a dribbler and a man moulded in the shape of Thomas Mofolo’s protagonist, Chaka, in the epic novel of the same title, could assemble his ‘enemies’ and ‘friends’ under one roof, and all of them would sing his praises to high heavens the way the Minna retired General did. Does IBB have friends; does he have enemies? I doubt it! At least not by what we saw in Abuja last Thursday.

MORE FROM RH AUTHOR: OPINION: Nuhu Ribadu’s Hell And Other Hellish Stories

Advertisement

Like the legendary Chaka, IBB was deft at swaying public sympathy at his book launch such that his numerous ‘victims’ rose to salute him, to praise him for inflicting pain on them. Billions of Naira were donated. Those who had nothing to ‘donate’ bought the book at huge prices. On the spot sale attracted N200,000 for a hardcover and N100,000 for a softcover. At the publishers’ bookstore, the copies go for N50,00 and N40,000 respectively! IBB smiled to the bank because he succeeded in playing the victim. We were all his mugu!

Former Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo was the only one who got the gist. Unfortunately, his audience was too laid-back; too torpid, to understand the innuendoes in the presentation made by the professor of Law. They simply laughed off a serious matter of the victims romanticising their tormentors. Such is the prowess, the dexterity of the Evil Genius at manipulating public opinion. Give it to IBB as the undisputed master of that art!

Even the contents of the book (I have read pages of the book as the discussion about it rages in the public space) speak more about the man than any other thing. The TELL Magazine interview of July 24, 1995, published on pages 323 to 359, is my favourite so far. The most interesting material in that interview is the submission of the senior journalists who conducted the interview that “It appears one can never pin you down…” (Pg 153). I read the interview long ago and I find it refreshing reading it again. IBB remained cagey all through the interview. That is vintage Evil Genius!

Advertisement

When juxtaposed with the entire memoir, the interview conducted 30 years ago and the book presented for public consumption less than a week ago, show that nothing has changed in the man, IBB! The length of the interview, a material that takes a whole 36 pages of the book in discourse, and the inability of the senior journalists to pin IBB down to anything, is an indication that till he enters his grave, IBB will continue to dribble us all! The entire “A Journey in Service” itself is about dribbling and “taking responsibility.” IBB is a man who selects his dictions carefully and understands both the surface and deep structure meanings of every word he utters.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Amaechi, el-Rufai And Alákedun

Why did IBB include that lengthy interview in his autobiography? What is the position of an average student of Stylistics on that inclusion? Simple. IBB by that stroke, is saying that there is nothing new to be learnt from “A Journey in Service.” And that is regrettably sad! The Tell Magazine interview of 1995 tells all the stories that need to be told about June 12, 1993, presidential election “won”, according to IBB, by the late Aare Ònà Kankanfo, Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola. The only addendum is the act of naming names that IBB introduced in chapter 12, ‘Transition to Civil Rule and the June 12 Saga (pgs 251-288).

Advertisement

Again, why did IBB wait for 32 years before he mentioned those who annulled the June 12, 1993, presidential election? To answer this, we will return to the legend of Olówó-Etí-Ureje (the rich man by the bank of the Ureje River) mentioned earlier.

Ureje River, an ancient river around Ado Ekiti, is popularised by so many stories. One of such stories is that of the rich man who built his house by the banks of the river. History simply gave him a descriptive name, Olówó-Etí-Ureje, because as rich as he was, the rich man stayed permanently by the riverside even when his creditors were scattered all over the place. Yet, he kept no records; mental or written. A very forgetful man!

Olówó-Etí-Ureje was said to be a man who lacked discretion and asked no questions. He trusted his debtors to be honest and faithful in their dealings with him. Though he was the richest and the most generous of his time, the rich man’s indiscretion and lackadaisical attitude was his undoing. Within a short time, he lost his fortunes and became as poor as the church rat. Only one debtor ruined him, and he never recovered as all efforts to bring him back to his prime days failed. How did it happen?

Advertisement

The story stated that one chronic debtor named Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé (He who borrows till the creditor forgets), borrowed money several times from the rich man and refused to pay after eliminating all those involved in the processes leading to the numerous loans.

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Obasa, His Mouth And Wild Pigeon

Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé had the habit of using his numerous slaves as pawns for the loans he took from the rich man. He equally used another set of slaves to stand as guarantors for the loans. A few months to when the loans were due for repayment, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would use a canoe to cross Ureje River to the other side and ask the pawns in the service of his creditor to cross the river in another canoe to his side to collect the money for the repayment of the loans.

Advertisement

On getting to his own side of the river, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would impound the canoes that brought the pawned slaves and ask them to swim back to the other side of the rich man. As slaves, the pawns had no option but to jump into the river and get drowned in the process of swimming back. Those who resisted the order were summarily executed. Since he owned the slaves, nobody would question the slave owner for whatever he did to his property.

Having settled the matter of the pawns, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would assemble all the slaves who stood as guarantors for the loans and conscript them for a needless war. At the war fronts, those unfortunate individuals would be given ordinary sticks to confront the opposing soldiers with guns and cannons. Your guess is as good as mine about the outcome of the battles and the fates of the slaves.

Thereafter, the debtor would approach Olówó-Etí-Ureje for the reconciliation of the loans. Trust Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé to argue that he had repaid all the loans and insisted that the rich man still owed him for the extra labour the various pawns worked on the rich man’s plantations. In most wicked cases, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé would also ask for his slave-pawns to be given back to him because he intended to pawn them away somewhere else!

Advertisement

With no records to show; pawns and guarantors to corroborate his claims, Olówó-Etí-Ureje would be forced to give more money to his debtor and also monitise the ‘loss’ of Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé’s slaves! That was how the rich man by the Ureje River became poor and the one who used to borrow money from him became stupendously rich. This story births the saying: Ìwòfà kú s’ódò, ogun mú Onígbòwó lo, gbogbo eni tó mo ìdí owó ti run; òhun ló so Olówó Etí Ureje d’òtòsì (The pawn drowned in the river, the guarantor is killed in war, everyone who bore witness to the loan is exterminated; reason why the rich man by bank of Ureje River became poor).

IBB must have a version of this tale in his Nupe background. The man, like the chronic debtor, Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé, waited for over three decades to tell us the ‘true’ story of what happened to our darling June 12, 1993, presidential election! He told us that MKO won the poll! He mentioned those who cut Abiola’s victory short. Then he took “responsibility” as the man at the top then! Whether we like it or not, no version of that episode can be more authentic than the one from IBB himself. Unfortunately, many of the people IBB mentioned, like the pawns and guarantors in our story above, are long dead and forgotten. The dead don’t tell tales, so they say!

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR: OPINION: Buhari’s Poverty Of Truth

Advertisement

How do we authenticate IBB’s story? Difficult as it was for Olówó Etí Ureje! And what did we do to IBB, our modern-day Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé? We, of course, rewarded him with more credit facilities! If you are in doubt, just check how much IBB raked in from the launch of “A Journey in Service”. Also check out those who gathered to ‘honour’ the man and the beautiful eulogies showered on him by all the Olowo Etí Ureje who gathered at the public book presentation last Thursday. We are a unique people-what in Latin is called: sui generis!

It is only in Nigeria that we can get that kind of crowd that gathered in Abuja for IBB and raised such a huge amount of money! If you add the figures to the ones that were not announced and the ones that will still come from those IBB “made’, you will agree with me why Nigerians have remained poorer and why their oppressors have continued to be richer by the seconds. And what more: the man who rules over us today said he owes his political ascendancy to the man IBB who made it possible for him to go into politics. That was the summary of the testimony of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at IBB’s book launch!

God knows that I don’t begrudge IBB for whatever he is worth. I have read several comments about the book launch and the ‘anger’ expressed over the June 12 saga. And in all honesty, I see nothing in those comments beyond the usual crowd resentment that will, again, amount to nothing! Pity! If after watching the Abuja book launch and the unity of greed by the attendees, and you still have faith that these locusts in power have the interests of the masses in the hearts, then, you are indeed and, in deed, a man of great faith!

Advertisement

IBB, the man of ‘destiny’, whose future was predicted by a Dibia almost eight decades ago, is 83 years old. I believe so much in the account of the childhood prediction for IBB as narrated by General Abdulsalami Abubakar, the former Head of State. I believe it because I have witnessed such predictions in the past. And on that, I take a bet: if IBB lives to commission his Presidential Library, he will get more donations than it happened in Abuja last week. Why?

It is apodictic that every Ayáwókíolówógbàgbé will become richer at the expense of all Olówó Etí Ureje. We don’t keep records here. We are too forgetful, too forgiving. We are all victims; all Olówó Etí Ureje, including yours sincerely. Even at my level, IBB and his publishers still ripped me off my hard earned N50,000, the cost of a hardcover copy of “A Journey in Service!” Do I simply say: My head will judge them, or I should ask: who send me?

Advertisement

News

IPF Celebrates Otuaro On His Birthday Anniversary

Published

on

By

The Ijaw Publishers’ Forum (IPF) has felicitated with Chief Dr. Dennis Otuaro, Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Programme, on the occasion of his birthday.

A statement issued by the secretary of the body, Tare Magbei, commended Otuaro for his “steady leadership of the Presidential Amnesty Programme,” which according to the forum has “continued to strengthen peace, rehabilitation, and development in the Niger Delta.”

READ ALSO: Otuaro Lauds Tinubu For Backing PAP’s Peacebuilding Process In Niger Delta

Advertisement

Your efforts in providing opportunities for ex-agitators and in advancing stability across the region stand as clear evidence of your dedication to the people and progress of our land.

“As you mark this new year of life, we join your family, friends, and well-wishers in praying for good health, wisdom, and greater success in the service of the Niger Delta and Nigeria.”

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Okpehbolo Appoints New VC For AAU

Published

on

By

Edo State governor, Monday Okpehbolo, has approved the appointment of Professor (Mrs.) Eunice Eboserehimen Omonzejie as the new Vice-Chancellor of the state-owned Ambrose Alli University (AAU), Ekpoma.

A statement issued late night by Secretary to the State Government, Umar Musa Ikhilor, said her appointment takes immediate effect.

According to the statement, Prof. Omonzejie was appointed amongst the three names submitted by the Governing Council of the university to the state government.

Advertisement

READ ALSO: Okpebholo Approves Construction Of 500-room Hostel For AAU

The statement partly reads, “Professor (Mrs.) Eunice Eboserehimen Omonzejie
Professor Omonzejie is a distinguished scholar of French and Francophone African Literatures and a long-serving academic in the Department of Modern Languages at Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma.

“She is a prolific researcher and editor, with contributions to African and Francophone literary studies, gender studies, and cultural studies.

Advertisement

“She has served as the President of the Ambrose Alli University Chapter of the National Association of Women Academics (NAWACS), where she has championed mentoring, research, and advocacy for female academics and students.

“Professor Omonzejie has co-edited several seminal works including French Language in Nigeria: Essays in Honour of UFTAN Pacesetters and Language Matters in Contemporary West Africa, and is the author of Women Novelists in Francophone Black Africa: Views, Reviews and Interviews,” the statement added.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

OPINION: Every democracy ‘Murders Itself’

Published

on

By

By Lasisi Olagunju

In ‘Jokes and Targets’ by Christie Davies, a Soviet journalist interviews a Chukchi man:

“Could you tell us briefly how you lived before the October revolution?”

Advertisement

“Hungry and cold.”

“How do you live now?”

“Hungry, cold, and with a feeling of deep gratitude.”

Advertisement

This sounds like Nigeria’s malaria victims thanking mosquitoes for their love and care. Between democracy and its opposite, reality has blurred the lines.

Last week, a group of White House pool reporters travelled with President Donald Trump on Air Force One as he returned from his U.K. state visit. At the beginning of the journey, actor Trump sauntered into the rear section of the plane, the traditional part for the press. He granted an interview and ended it with a morbid wish: “Fly safely. You know why I say that? Because I’m on the flight. I want to get home. Otherwise I wouldn’t care.”

Ten years ago, if a US president said what Trump told those poor reporters, his presidency would suffer immediate cardiac arrest. But this is Colin Crouch’s post-democracy era: the leader, whether in the US or in Nigeria, in Africa or elsewhere, is the law; whatever he does or says, we bow in gratitude.

Advertisement

I live in a Nigeria of gratitude and surrender. In the North-West and the North-East, traumatised communities are grateful to bandits and their enablers. They invite them to the negotiation table and thank the murderous gunmen for honouring the invitation. A grateful nation anoints and weeps at the feet of terrorists. In emergency-weaned Rivers State, its remorseful governor is effusive in appreciation of a second chance. The reinstated is ever thankful for the favours of a six-month suspension. From the North to the South, on bad roads and in death-wracked hospital wards, sonorous hymns of appreciation for big mercies ooze. The legislature and the judiciary, even the fourth estate, are all in congregation, singing songs of praise of the benevolent executive. Is this still a democracy?

American political scientists, Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman in 2020 wrote ‘The Fragile Republic’ for The Foreign Affairs. In that essay, they list four symptoms of democratic backsliding. Prime among the four are economic inequality and excessive executive power. “Excessive executive power” is a three-word synonym for autocratization of democracy. It is a by-word for a democracy hanging itself.

The second president of the United States of America, John Adams, saw today; he warned of democracy decaying and dying: “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” Adams was not alone. There was also William Blake, 18th/19th century English poet, who said “if men were wise, the most arbitrary princes could not hurt them. If they are not wise, the freest government is compelled to be a tyranny.” This reads like it was written today and here. If you disagree, I ask: Is it wise (and normal) for the tormented to thank the tormentor?

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: A Minister’s Message To Me

Listening to what Trump wished the reporters, we could see that big brother America now leads in democratic ‘erantship’, the Third World merely follows. An enormous country, strong enough to appropriate the name of an entire continent, America, in 2025, is blessed with a strongman that is armed with a licence to rule as it pleases his whim; a president who does what he likes and says what he likes or ‘jokes’ about it without consequences. The result is an imperial presidency that has redefined democracy across the world.

We say here that the yam of the one who is vigilant never gets burnt. The American system used to be very resilient in providing a leash on presidential excesses. It still does, although under a very difficult situation. Donald Trump, in his first term between 2017 and 2021, signed 220 Executive Orders. In his ongoing second term that began in January 2025, he has, as of September 18, 2025, already signed 204 Executive Orders upturning this balance, rupturing that tendon. An American friend told me that he could no longer recognise his country. But the good news is that those who should talk and act are not surrendering their country to Trump and his faction of the populace. Because it is America (and not Nigeria), there are over 300 lawsuits challenging Trump’s executive orders or policies in his second term.

Advertisement

The active legal challenges view the Trump orders either as unconstitutional, exceeding statutory power, or violating rights. And the courts are also doing their job as they should. A 2025 study found some 150 judicial decisions concerning these orders. Some are preliminary injunctions, others are full rulings. President Bola Tinubu last week acknowledged the existence of “over 40 cases in the courts in Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Yenagoa, to invalidate” his Rivers State emergency order. Our courts, especially the Supreme Court, are yet to acknowledge any of the cases with trials, rulings and orders.

It is easy for presidents with unrestrained executive powers to assume imperial airs. In the past, when they did, they feared losing their link with the people and a fall from power. Today, they are on very solid ground, no matter what they do with their people. Midway into his term as US president, an increasingly unpopular Jimmy Carter reassessed himself, and in lamentation told Washington Post’s David Broder that he (Carter) had “fallen into the trap of being ‘head of the government’ rather than ‘leader of the people.’” Today is not that yesterday of sin and punishment. We have surrendered to the point of giving ourselves away. Today’s leaders know that what they need is the government, its power and privileges, certainly not the people. And they keep working hard at it such that America has Trump, and is not the only country that has a Trump. There are Trumps everywhere. We have them in Africa, from the north to the coast.

What democracy suffers in America it suffers more in Africa. Former President Goodluck Jonathan said at the weekend that “democracy in the African continent is going through a period of strain and risk of collapse unless stakeholders come together to rethink and reform it.” He said politicians manipulate the electoral system to perpetuate themselves in office even when the people don’t want them. “Our people want to enjoy their freedom. They want their votes to count during elections. They want equitable representation and inclusivity. They want good education. Our people want security. They want access to good healthcare. They want jobs. They want dignity. When leaders fail to meet these basic needs, the people become disillusioned.” That is from Jonathan who was our president for six years. Did he say these new things because he wants to come back?

Advertisement

Democracy is like water; a wrong dose turns it to poison. If disillusionment has a home, it is in Africa. It is the reason why the youths of the continent are bailing out for succour, and the reason for Trump’s $100,000 fee on work visas.

In The North American Review of November 1910, Samuel J. Kornhauser reproduced a quotation that contains warnings of what threat a people could constitute to their own freedom: “The same tendencies to wanton abuse of power which exist in a despot or a ruling oligarchy may be expected in a democracy from the ruling majority, because they are tendencies incidental to human nature.” The solution was “a free people setting limitations upon the exercise of their own will” so that they would not “turn democracy into a curse instead of a blessing.”

MORE FROM THE THE AUTHOR:OPINION: HID Awolowo And The Yoruba Woman

Advertisement

In his 1904 essay, ‘The Relation of the Executive to the Legislative Power’, James T. Young, observed a dramatic shift in American governance: while Woodrow Wilson had earlier warned of “Congressional supremacy,” Young argued that “we now live under a system of executive supremacy,” showing how the traditional checks and balances had failed to maintain equilibrium among the branches. That was in 1904, a hundred and twenty one years ago.

Someone said a leader’s ability to lead a society successfully is dependent on their capacity to govern themselves. It is that self-governing capacity that is lacking in our power circles. Plus the leaders don’t think they owe history anything. “From the errors of others, a wise man corrects himself…The wise man sees in the misfortune of others what he should avoid.” Publilius Syrus (85–43 BC), the Roman writer credited with uttering those nuggets, was a master of proverbs and apophthegm. We don’t listen to such words; we don’t mind being tripped by the same stone, and it does not matter falling into the same pit.

A democracy can enthrone emperors and kings but it is not that easy to ask them to dismount the high horse of the state without huge costs. We elect leaders and for unsalutory reasons, we let them roam freely with our lives, our safety and our comfort. We promote and defend them with our freedom. I hope we know the full import (and consequences) of the seed we are planting today. A Pharaoh will come who won’t remember that there was ever a Joseph.

Advertisement

A Roman emperor called Caligula reigned from 16 March, 37 AD until he was put to sleep on 24 January, 41 AD. ‘Caligula’ was not the name his parents gave him; it was an alias, “a joke of the troops” which trumped his real identity: He was named after popular Julius Caesar.

Roman historian, Claudius Suetonius, records in his ‘The Lives of the Caesars’ that Caligula became emperor after his father’s death and then “full and absolute power was at once put into his hands by the unanimous consent of the senate and of the mob, which forced its way into the House.” The new leader came popular with a lot of the people’s hope invested in him. Suetonius says the young man “assumed various surnames (for he was called ‘Pious,’ ‘Child of the Camp,’ ‘Father of the Armies,’ and ‘Greatest and Best of Caesars’). Soon the fawning appellations entered his head and he became the opposite of what his people wanted in their leader. One day, Emperor Caligula chanced “to overhear some kings who had come to Rome to pay their respects to him” doing what Yoruba kings love doing: He found them arguing at dinner about whose throne, among them, was the greatest and the highest in nobility. The emperor heard them and cried: “Let there be one Lord, one King.” He called them to order and from that point, it was clear to everyone that republican Rome now had one Lord, one king, and that was Caligula.

The man said and did things that frightened even the heartless. At a point during his reign, Caligula saw a mass of Roman people, the rabble, applauding some nobles whom he detested. He voiced his hatred for what the people did and said what he thought should be their punishment: “I wish the Roman people had but a single neck so I could cut it through at one blow.” That statement became a quote which has, through centuries, defined his place in history.
It would appear that 79-year old Donald Trump defined himself for history last week with his “fly safely…because I’m on the flight” statement. A leader, a father and grandfather said he did not care if a plane-load of young men and women perished (without him) in a crash. And he told them so.

Advertisement

MORE FROM THE AUTHOR:OPINION: On El-Rufai, Aláròká And Terrorists

A Twi proverb suggests that “the chief feels the heat only when his own roof is on fire.” Trump’s unfortunate remark is said to be a joke. Even as a joke, what the US president said sits in a long tradition of expensive jokes. Trump’s cruel ‘jest’ couldn’t be funny to any people even if they were under the spell of the leader. History and literature are full of such costly quips that come light from the tongue but which reveal something raw about power and rulers: power does not agree that all human beings possess equal worth, equal dignity, and equal rights. Power talks, and whenever it talks, it sets itself apart.
King Louis XV of France is remembered for uttering the line: “Après moi, le déluge (After me, the flood).” Some commentators say it was a joke, some others say it was a shrug. History interpreted what Louis XV said as the king not caring a hoot whatever might happen to France after he was gone. That statement is a sound bite that has clung to him forever as Abraham Lincoln’s mother’s prayer clung to her son.

When Louis XV said it, no one saw what the king said as a prophecy, grim and ghastly. I am not sure he also knew the full import of what he said. But it was prescient; fifteen years after his reign, the “flood” came furious with the 1789 revolution culminating in the effective abolition of the French monarchy by the proclamation of the First Republic on September 21, 1792.

Advertisement

Emperor Nero of Rome is remembered forever for playing the fiddle while Rome was burning. In William Shakespeare’s Henry VI, we read a verse that ends with “Nero, Play(ing) on the lute, beholding the towns burn.” What is remembered of Nero is the image of a leader who ‘enjoyed the life of his head’ while his empire got destroyed by fire set at it by the enemy. But did the emperor really do that? Read this from the Encyclopaedia Britannica: “So, did Nero fiddle while Rome burned? No. Sort of. Maybe. More likely, he strummed a proto-guitar while dreaming of the new city that he hoped would arise in the fire’s ashes. That isn’t quite the same thing as doing nothing, but it isn’t the sort of decisive leadership one might hope for either.”

I have roamed from imperial Rome to medieval France, to democratic America and its Nigerian side-kick. What is next here is to go back, and salute John Adams with this his dispraise of democracy: “It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy.” A system or a country becomes a joke when its leaders toy with its destiny; when they make light of the fears of their people.

The Akan of Ghana warn that if you sit on comfortable rotten wood to eat pawpaw, your bottom gets wet and your mouth also gets wet. This is to say that there are consequences for choices made. A kabiyesi democracy is an autocratic monarchy. And what does that feel like? I read of a king who joked to his courtiers during famine: “Hunger has no teeth sharp enough to bite me in my palace.” It was a careless statement of a monarchy that has found its way into the mouth of our democracy. I saw it where I read it that the ‘joke’ “was remembered bitterly by the starving commoners who later sang satirical songs about the unfeeling king.” Some jokes outlive their laughter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version